Person G entered in to a contract with person M in order to purchase plaza H. Person G visited plaza H numerous times and noted that water system, sewer and occupancy. Person G never asked to see the books and nor person M attempt to conceal them. After purchasing the plaza H, he repaired the septic and well systems. Three years later he sold the plaza H because of deficit and sued defendant challenging that defendant made fraudulent statements on which while purchasing the park. To discuss: The decisions regarding fraudulent statements.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 11, Problem 13CP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person G entered in to a contract with person M in order to purchase plaza H. Person G visited plaza H numerous times and noted that water system, sewer and occupancy. Person G never asked to see the books and nor person M attempt to conceal them. After purchasing the plaza H, he repaired the septic and well systems. Three years later he sold the plaza H because of deficit and sued defendant challenging that defendant made fraudulent statements on which while purchasing the park.

To discuss: The decisions regarding fraudulent statements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Rafferty was the principal shareholder in Continental Corporation, and, as a result, he received the lion’s share of Continental’s dividends. Continental Corporation was eager to close an important deal for iron ore products to use in its business. A written contract was on the desk of Stage Corporation for the sale of the iron ore to Continental. Stage Corporation, however, was cautious about signing the contract; and it did not sign until Rafferty called Stage Corporation on the telephone and stated that if Continental Corporation did not pay for the ore, he would. Business reversals struck Continental Corporation, and it failed. Stage Corporation sues Rafferty. What defense, if any, has Rafferty?

David E. Ross, his two brothers, and their families operated and owned the entire stock of five businesses. Ross had three children: Rod, David II, and Betsy. David II and Betsy were not involved in the operation of the companies, but Rod began working for one of the firms, Equitable Life and Casualty Insurance Company, in 2007. Between 2009 and 2013, the elder Ross informed a number of persons of his desire to reward Rod for his work with Equitable Life by giving him stock in addition to the stock he would inherit. He subsequently executed several stock transfers to Rod, representing shares in various family businesses, which were reflected by appropriate entries on the corporate books. Certificates were issued in Rod’s name and placed in an envelope identified with the name Rod Ross, but they were kept with the other family stock certificates in an office safe to which Rod did not have access. In all, one-fourth of the stock holdings of David E. Ross were transferred to Rod in this…

Johnson, who owned a hardware store, was indebted to Hutchinson, one of her suppliers. Johnson sold her business to Lockhart, one of Johnson’s previous competitors, who combined the inventory from Johnson’s store with his own and moved them to a new, larger store. Hutchinson claims that Lockhart must pay Johnson’s debt because the sale of the business had been made without complying with the requirements of the bulk sales law. Discuss whether Lockhart is obligated to pay Hutchison’s debt to Johnson.