Case summary:The government of H entered into a contract with an arms dealer known as R to buy weapons for over the six-year period. When the government was replaced in H then the government decided to reduce military size which resulted in deterioration of the relationship with R. The government H refused to honor the contract by purchasing more arms and paying lesser amounts for the same. R filed a case in the federal district court of the US to recover the damages caused.
To discuss: The preclusion of this lawsuit by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
Explanation of Solution
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is a judicial practice and it means that if any defendant who belongs to any foreign country or is eligible to belong from a foreign state under the act of FSAI then that person is immune to any legal actions or proceedings in any court which is situated in the US (both federal and state) unless there is an applicable exception for that immunity.
One of the exceptions of FSAI is that when a foreign state engages itself in commercial activity within or outside of the US and has an effect on the US, which is direct in nature then, in this case, the foreign state will not be immune. In accordance with this exception, the US state is getting affected directly by this commercial activity and so the government of H will not be free from the FSAI lawsuit.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- De Beers and Conflict Diamonds (A) For decades De Beers operated a cartel in the diamond industry in which it controlled nearly 80 percent of the distribution of rough diamonds.80 De Beers also produced, primarily in South Africa, a large but decreasing share of the world’s diamonds. The company founded by Cecile Rhodes and managed by the Oppenheimer family bought under long-term contracts the bulk of the world’s diamonds from mining companies, maintained a large inventory, and sold rough diamonds in an orderly manner to maintain high prices. Distribution of the diamonds was through the Central Selling Organization in London, which sold in bulk to diamond cutters.81 De Beers did not have retail operations. This system worked well until 1990 when the production of diamonds increased and more began to leak into the market. The collapse of the Soviet Union and increased production there and production increases in Western Canada and elsewhere resulted in an increase in the…arrow_forwardAdvances in biological technology have enabled two research companies, Bio Labs, Inc. and Scientific Associates, to develop an insect-resistant corn seed. Neither company is financially strong enough to develop the distribution channels necessary to bring the product to world markets. World Agra Distributors, Inc. has negotiated contracts with both companies for the exclusive right to market their seed. Bio Labs signed an agreement to receive an annual royalty of $1,000,000. In contrast, Scientific Associates chose an agreement that provides for a royalty of $0.50 per pound of seed sold. Both agreements have a 10-year term. During Year 1, World Agra sold approximately 1,600,000 pounds of the Bio Labs, Inc. seed and 2,400,000 pounds of the Scientific Associates seed. Both types of seed were sold for $1.25 per pound. By the end of Year 1, it was apparent that the seed developed by Scientific Associates was superior. Although insect infestation was virtually nonexistent for both types of…arrow_forwardGlobal Crossing The company was founded in 1997 to provide a trans-Atlantic cable to carry telephone and data traffic. Using high-bandwidth optical fiber, the company was able to sell capacity at less than half the price of existing competitors. After six months of operations, Global Crossing offered stock to the public, and the resulting price valued the firm at an astounding $19 billion. Six months later it was valued at $38 billion, more than the Ford Motor Company. The cable technology was not proprietary and data-carrying capacity was a commodity. That meant that customers could easily switch from one supplier to another, putting them in a powerful bargaining position. Furthermore, customers were price-sensitive. Even worse, the threat of entry was high, and other companies were entering the business, fueled by easy financing. High fixed costs but near-zero marginal costs (the cost to carry one more piece of data) led to fierce price competition within the industry. As new…arrow_forward
- Licensing is A. offering the right to a trademark, patent, trade secret, or similarly valued items of intellectual property in return for a royalty or fee. B. contracting with a foreign firm to manufacture products according to certain specifications. C. when a foreign country and a local firm invest together to create a local business. D. having a company handle its own exports directly, without intermediaries. E. exporting through an intermediary, which often has the knowledge and means to succeed in selling a firm's product abroad.arrow_forwardThe South Africa’s National Credit Amendment Bill was officially passed by the NationalCouncil of Provinces on 8 March and has now been sent to the President to be signed into law.The bill aims to provide relief to over-indebted South Africans who have no other means ofextracting themselves from over-indebtedness. Specifically, the bill will allow certainapplicants to have their debt suspended in part or in full for up to 24 months. This debt maythen be extinguished altogether if the financial circumstances of the applicant do not improve.The criteria for meeting this debt write-off include:• Where the unsecured debt is not more than R50,000;• Where the unsecured debt was accrued through unsecured credit agreements, unsecuredshort-term credit transactions or unsecured credit facilities only;• Where the person earned no more than R7,500 a month over the last six months A financial service provider (XYZ limited Bank) has hired you to conduct an analysis on howit will comply with this new…arrow_forwardShould Cameron have licensed McTaggart or continued to export?arrow_forward
- Determine the buyer’s and seller’s responsibility in a commercial transaction. Unvergleichbar Gesellschaft AG, based in Bremen, Germany buys raw diamonds from Diamants Stornoway based in Longueuil, QC, under the following terms: Terms of sale: DPU Flughafen Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland, Incoterms 2020: a)The buyer asks for a last minute change before approving the transaction. He no longer wants to clear the shipment at German customs, want the diamonds to be delivered at DHL warehouse in Bremen. How should Incoterms be modified so as to reflect those changes?arrow_forward"French survivors of the Holocaust sued Yahoo USA because French citizens were purchasing Nazi memorabilia on Yahoo’s U.S. website. The lawsuit also charged Yahoo USA with hosting the websites of anti-Semitic groups.arrow_forwardSPRINT is negotiating with Carly Rae Jepsen’s lawyers to use her copyrighted hit song “Call Me Maybe” in a commercial launching its new cell phone campaign. What is the intellectual property document that SPRINT will have to obtain from Carly Rae Jepsen? Explain the purpose of this document.arrow_forward
- distinguish between customs act, customs tariff act and eipaarrow_forwardPrice Fixing. Together, EMI, Sony BMG MusicEntertainment, Universal Music Group Recordings, Inc., andWarner Music Group Corp. produced, licensed, and distributed 80 percent of the digital music sold in the United States.the companies formed MusicNet to sell music to online services that sold the songs to consumers. MusicNet required allof the services to sell the songs at the same price and subject tothe same restrictions. Digitization of music became cheaper,but MusicNet did not change its prices. Did MusicNet violatethe antitrust laws? Explain. [Starr v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment, 592 F.3d 314 (2d Cir. 2010)] (See Section 1 of theSherman Act.)arrow_forwardThis case describes a hypothetical situation faced by a fictitious international conglomerate, ICL, that intends to enter the retail grocery market in Hong Kong. The conglomerate's interest in the Hong Kong supermarket industry was initially kindled by the plan of Hutchison Whampoa, Ltd. (HWL) to sell its leading supermarket chain PARKnSHOP in August 2013. However, in October 2013, HWL reversed course and decided not to sell PARKnSHOP, saying that the sale would not deliver maximum value to its shareholders. Before embarking into new territory, ICL wanted an in-depth understanding of the Hong Kong grocery market environment, competitors, and potential barriers to entry. The conglomerate was aware that the new Competition Law, which was expected to take effect in 2015, might have profound implications on the grocery market landscape in Hong Kong. Case Study Question. 1. Should the international conglomerate enter the retail grocery market in Hong Kong? If so, what could it do to…arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education