Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 21CP
Summary Introduction
Case summary:
Company T and state government F entered into annual contracts governing the salvage of ship A. Ship A sank in 1622 carrying a treasure of over $250 million. Both parties assumed that ship A lying on seabed under the land owned by state F. In right to salvage the lands, company T made a contract to give 25% of the items recovered in salvage to state F and delivered the artefacts as per contract. At last, court ruled that the sea bed over which ship A is resting is never owned by state F. Company T sued to annul the contract and recovered the artefacts it delivered to state F.
To discuss: Should company T prevail.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The Madariagas owned a restaurant where they served " Albert's Famous Mexican Hot Sauce . " They entered into a contract to sell the restaurant and the formula for the secret sauce to Morris . Although Morris paid the agreed - upon price , the sellers refused to give him the recipe unless he also paid them lifetime royalties for the salsa . Which of these remedies should Morris seek : expectation , restitution , specific performance , or reformation ? Why ?
A got into a vehicular accident with B due to the fault of the latter. The case could very well fall under the crime of Reckless Imprudence Resulting to Physical Injuries in addition to suit for collection of money, but A opted not to file a criminal case against B since such filing of criminal case against a churchmate would mean his dismissal from their church. Instead, A chose to file a case for collection of sum of money only based on their agreement that B will pay A for all the expenses incurred by reason of the accident except for the repair of the car since B will directly pay the same to the A’s insurance company. However, B refused to pay A for his travel expenses and meal allowances when he travels to the repair shop during his routine check-ups on the progress of the repair even after A insisted on B’s agreement to pay all the damages. Whose contention is correct? Is it B’s refusal to pay A’s expenses during routine check-ups or is it A’s insistence on B’s liability to pay…
Florida land developer Lehigh would show prospective buyers Lehigh Acres and have the buyers stay at its motel. Competitor Azar would watch for the buyers, contact them at the motel, tell them that under federal law they had three days to cancel any contract with Lehigh, and then show them a less expensive property that he was selling.
Question:
What legal tort could apply in this circumstance?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 11 - Prob. 1COCh. 11 - Prob. 2COCh. 11 - Prob. 3COCh. 11 - Prob. 4COCh. 11 - Prob. 5COCh. 11 - Prob. 1QCh. 11 - Prob. 2QCh. 11 - Prob. 3QCh. 11 - Prob. 4QCh. 11 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 11 - Prob. 6QCh. 11 - Prob. 7QCh. 11 - Prob. 8QCh. 11 - Prob. 9QCh. 11 - Prob. 10CPCh. 11 - Prob. 11CPCh. 11 - Prob. 12CPCh. 11 - Prob. 13CPCh. 11 - Prob. 14CPCh. 11 - Prob. 15CPCh. 11 - Prob. 16CPCh. 11 - Prob. 17CPCh. 11 - Prob. 18CPCh. 11 - Prob. 19CPCh. 11 - Prob. 20CPCh. 11 - Prob. 21CPCh. 11 - Prob. 22CPCh. 11 - Prob. 23CPCh. 11 - Prob. 1TSCh. 11 - Prob. 2TSCh. 11 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Mohsin acquired a piece of agricultural land in Moro, Sindh from a local landlord, Qasim Soomro, on a lease term of twenty years. The revenue payable by Qasim Soomro on his land to the Provincial Government was in arrears. As a result, the land was advertised for sale by the Provincial Government. Mohsin, in order to prevent the sale of land, paid the sum due by Qasim Soomro to the Provincial Government. Under the provisions of Contract Act, 1872 explain whether Mohsin can recover such amount from Qasim Soomro.arrow_forwardState whether the following agreements or contracts are void, voidable valid, and provide a reason for your answer. 1 ) Taylor, aged 17, gets married, and divorces two months later. After getting divorced, she enters into a contract with Michael for the sale of his house. ( 2 ) Jessica, aged 5, enters into a contract with John, aged 11, for the sale of his bicycle. 3 ) Nomsa, aged 16, runs a successful boutique with the consent of her parents, and enters into a contract relating to her business. 4 ) Amy, who is 17, has inherited an apartment in Cape Town from her deceased father. The apartment is valued at R2 million. With her mother’s assistance, Amy enters into an agreement to sell the apartment to her aunt. 5 ) Justin, who is mentally ill, concludes a contract for the sale of his laptop without his curator knowing. (2)arrow_forwardMohsin acquired a piece of agricultural land in Moro, Sindh from a local landlord, QasimSoomro, on a lease term of twenty years. The revenue payable by QasimSoomro on his land to the Provincial Government was in arrears. As a result, the land was advertised for sale by the Provincial Government. Mohsin, in order to prevent the sale of land, paid the sum due by QasimSoomro to the Provincial Government. Under the provisions of Contract Act, 1872 explain whether Mohsin can recover such amount from QasimSoomro.arrow_forward
- Dennis and Donna Smith owned a 10-acre tract of land that they decided to sell. The couple entered into a listing agreement with Kelly McLaughlin, a licensed real estate broker. The agreement gave Kelly the exclusive right to sell the property for a period of 6 months. The Smiths agreed to pay Kelly a 6% commission of the selling price if a buyer was found during the listing period. Four months later, the Smiths sent Kelly a letter terminating the listing agreement. Kelly did not approve of the conditions. One month later, Kelly presented a full price offer to the Smiths; however, they ignored the offer and sold the property to another buyer. Kelly sued the Smiths for breach of the agency agreement. Which party wins the lawsuit? Did the Smiths act ethically in this case?arrow_forwardPauline Brown was shot and seriously injured by an unknown assailant in the parking lot of National Supermarkets. Pauline and George Brown brought a negligence action against National, Sentry Security Agency, and T. G. Watkins, a security guard and Sentry employee. Sentry had a security contract with National. The Browns maintained that the defendants have a legal duty to protect National’s customers both in the store and in the parking lot, and that this duty was breached. The defendants denied this allegation. What will the Browns have to prove to prevail? Explain.arrow_forward“A” and “B” entered into a verbal contract whereby “A” agreed to sell to “B” his only parcel of land for P20,000 and B agreed to buy at the aforementioned price. “B” went to the bank, withdrew the necessary amount, and returned to “A” for the consummation of the contract. “A,” however, had changed his mind and refused to go through with the sale. Is the agreement valid? Will an action by “B” against “A” for specific performance prosper? Reason.arrow_forward
- Martha Simms is the plaintiff in a contract suit she has brought against Floral Supply, Inc., for its failure to deliver the green sponge Martha needed in building the floral designs she sells to exclusive home decorators. Martha had to obtain the sponge from another supplier and was late on seven deliveries. One of Martha’s customers has been called by Martha’s lawyer as a witness and is now on the witness stand, testifying about Martha’s late performance and the penalty she charged. The lawyer for Floral Supply knows that Martha’s customer frequently waives penalties for good suppliers. 1. In what legal tribunal the Simm’s case is tried? 2.To which jurisdiction does the trial of the Simm’s case belong?arrow_forwardPlease do not give solution in image formate thanku. Catherine Creteau and her husband contracted with a travel agency, Liberty Travel, to arrange a trip to Jamaica.While staying in Jamaica in accommodations arranged by Liberty Travel, they were robbed at gunpoint. The Creteaus alleged that Liberty Travel either knew of safety issues with the accommodations or such information was available to Liberty Travel. What duty did the Creteaus allege their agent had breached?arrow_forwardWilliam Carlton was the sole shareholder in ten New York City corporations, including Seon Cab Corporation. Each corporation owned two taxicabs, and each cab was covered by the minimum $10,000.00 automobile liability insurance required under New York State law. A taxicab owned by Seon Cab Corporation struck and severely injured John Walkovsky, who sued for damages. Walkovsky named all ten corporations, Carlton individually, as well as the individual driving the cab that hit him, as defendants. The plaintiff alleged that the corporations, although seemingly independent of one another, operate as a single entity, unit and enterprise with regard to financing, supplies, repairs, employees, and garaging. The plaintiff asserted that the multiple corporate structure constituted an unlawful attempt to defraud members of the general public who might be injured by the cabs. He sought to hold Carlton, the sole shareholder of each corporation, personally liable for his injuries. 1. Suppose…arrow_forward
- William Carlton was the sole shareholder in ten New York City corporations, including Seon Cab Corporation. Each corporation owned two taxicabs, and each cab was covered by the minimum $10,000.00 automobile liability insurance required under New York State law. A taxicab owned by Seon Cab Corporation struck and severely injured John Walkovsky, who sued for damages. Walkovsky named all ten corporations, Carlton individually, as well as the individual driving the cab that hit him, as defendants. The plaintiff alleged that the corporations, although seemingly independent of one another, operate as a single entity, unit and enterprise with regard to financing, supplies, repairs, employees, and garaging. The plaintiff asserted that the multiple corporate structure constituted an unlawful attempt to defraud members of the general public who might be injured by the cabs. He sought to hold Carlton, the sole shareholder of each corporation, personally liable for his injuries. 1. Is there…arrow_forwardAt least six months before the Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia, a group made up of Stafford Fontenot, Steve Turner, Mike Montelaro, Joe Sokol, and Doug Brinsmade agreed to sell Cajun food at the games and began making preparations. On May 19, the group (calling themselves Prairie Cajun Seafood Catering of Louisiana) applied for a business license with the county health department. Ted Norris sold members of the group a mobile kitchen in return for an $8,000 check drawn on the “Prairie Cajun Sea-food Catering of Louisiana” account and two promissory notes, one for $12,000 and the other for $20,000. The notes, which were dated June 12, listed only Fontenot “d/b/a Prairie Cajun Seafood” as the maker (d/b/a is an abbreviation for “doing business as”). On July 31, Fontenot and his friends signed a partnership agreement, which listed specific percentages of profits and losses. They drove the mobile kitchen to Atlanta, but business was disastrous. When the notes were not paid, Norris…arrow_forwardAt least six months before the Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia, a group made up of Stafford Fontenot, Steve Turner, Mike Montelaro, Joe Sokol, and Doug Brinsmade agreed to sell Cajun food at the games and began making preparations. On May 19, the group (calling themselves Prairie Cajun Seafood Catering of Louisiana) applied for a business license with the county health department. Ted Norris sold members of the group a mobile kitchen in return for an $8,000 check drawn on the “Prairie Cajun Sea-food Catering of Louisiana” account and two promissory notes, one for $12,000 and the other for $20,000. The notes, which were dated June 12, listed only Fontenot “d/b/a Prairie Cajun Seafood” as the maker (d/b/a is an abbreviation for “doing business as”). On July 31, Fontenot and his friends signed a partnership agreement, which listed specific percentages of profits and losses. They drove the mobile kitchen to Atlanta, but business was disastrous. When the notes were not paid, Norris…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON