Principles of Microeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (12th Edition)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780134421315
Author: Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 2.1P
To determine
Fed, investment spending, and the federal funds rate.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The Federal Reserve Board of Governors has the power to raise or lower short-term interest rates. Between 2005 and 2006, the Fed aggressively increased the benchmark federal funds interest rate from 2.5 percent in February 2005 to 5.25 percent in June 2006, where it remained until July 2007. From July 2007 to December 2008, the Fed rapidly decreased the federal funds rate, where it dropped to 0.16 percent and remained between 0.07 percent and 0.20 percent through November 2015, after which it again began to rise. Assuming that other interest rates also increased and then decreased along with the federal funds rate, what effects do you think those moves had on investment spending in the economy? Explain your answer. What do you think the Fed’s objective was in increasing and then decreasing the federal funds rate? When and why might the Fed decide to start raising the federal funds rate?
Targeting the federal funds rate ( is, is not ) as important a tool today as it was before the 2007-2009 financial crisis. During the financial crisis when the federal funds rate was near zero, the Fed ( did, did not ) wish to go lower than zero and came up with alternatives to influence interest rates and lending: the administered rates. Today, the Fed still sets a target for the federal funds rate but finds it more effective to change the administered rates. By doing that, the Fed can stimulate or restrict lending. The federal funds rate is the Feds policy rate and (is, is not ) useful when providing forward guidance.
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
In 2003, as the U.S. economy finally seemed poised to exit its ongoing recession, the Fed began to worry about a “soft patch” in the economy, in particular the possibility of a deflation. As a result, the Fed proactively lowered the federal funds rate from 1.75% in late 2002 to 1% by mid-2003, the lowest federal funds rate on record up to that point in time. In addition, the Fed committed to keeping the federal funds rate at this level for a considerable period of time. This policy was considered highly expansionary and was seen by some as potentially inflationary and unnecessary.
Â
a. How might fears of a zero lower bound justify such a policy, even if the economy was not actually in a recession?
Â
b. Show the impact of these policies on the MP curve and the AD/AS graph. Be sure to show the initial conditions in 2003 and the impact of the policy on the deflation threat.
Chapter 11 Solutions
Principles of Microeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (12th Edition)
Ch. 11.A - Prob. 1PCh. 11.A - Prob. 2PCh. 11.A - Prob. 3PCh. 11.A - Calculate the present value of the income streams...Ch. 11.A - Prob. 5PCh. 11.A - Prob. 6PCh. 11.A - Prob. 7PCh. 11.A - Prob. 8PCh. 11.A - Prob. 9PCh. 11.A - Prob. 10P
Ch. 11.A - Prob. 11PCh. 11.A - Prob. 12PCh. 11 - Prob. 1.1PCh. 11 - Prob. 1.2PCh. 11 - Prob. 1.3PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.1PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.2PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.3PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.4PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.5PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.7PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.8PCh. 11 - Prob. 2.9PCh. 11 - Prob. 3.1PCh. 11 - Prob. 3.2PCh. 11 - Prob. 3.3PCh. 11 - Prob. 3.4PCh. 11 - Prob. 3.5PCh. 11 - Prob. 3.6P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The following graph shows a hypothetical demand function for federal funds. Currently, the total amount of reserves in the banking system is $50 billion, the discount rate is 3.5 percent, and interest on reserves equals IOR = 1 percent. If demand for federal funds increases by $40 billion, the equilibrium fed funds rate will equal: Federal Funds Rate (FFR) 5.50% 5.00% 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% SO $10 O a. FFR = 3.00% Ob. FFR = 3.50% O c. FFR = 4.00% d. FFR = 4.50% Oe. None of the above. $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 570 580 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130 $140 Bank Excess Reserves (SBillion)arrow_forwardThe Federal Reserve does not target both the money supply and an interest rate because it would be too confusing to Wall Street and would disrupt the financial markets. it would be too easy for Wall Street to determine what policy the Fed is following and this would destabilize the economy. it would be illegal according to the Federal Reserve Act. the Fed cannot achieve a target for both the money supply and an interest rate at the same time.arrow_forwardThe following graph shows a hypothetical demand function for federal funds. Currently, the total amount of reserves in the banking system is $50 billion, the discount rate is 3.5 percent, and interest on reserves equals IOR = 1 percent. The Fed wants to reduce the equilibrium fed funds rate to 1.5% by reducing the discount rate. In that case, it has to stand ready to provide $X billion of discount loans to the commercial banks at the new discount rate. What is the value of X? Federal Funds Rate (FFR) 5.50% 5.00% 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% SO $10 O a. X= $0 billion O b. X= $10 billion O c. X= $20 billion O d. X= $30 billion e. None of the above. $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130 $140 Bank Excess Reserves ($Billion)arrow_forward
- Naked Economics: Undressing the Dismal Science Book by Charles Wheelan  Please refer to the chapter titled, "The Federal Reserve," in the Naked Economics book to answer this question. Which of the below statements DOES NOT CORRECTLY describe the immense power or policy choice of the Federal Reserve (the Fed), as explained in this chapter? 1) The Federal Reserve controls the money supply and therefore the credit tap for the economy.  2) The Fed can use monetary policy to counteract economic downturns, or prevent them from happening.  3) The Fed can inject money into the financial system after sudden shocks, such as the 1987 stock market crash or the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.  4) When the Fed opens the credit tap and increases the money supply, interest rates rise and people buy less and borrow less.arrow_forwardFederal Funds Rale The graph to the right illustrates how the Fed uses discounting to keep the federal funds rate from rising far above the federal funds target. It shows a rightward shift of the demand curve for reserves from R to R. The initial equilibrium is at point 1, where the discount rate (a) is above the federal funds rate, which is equal to its target level, i. The shift moves the equilibrium to point 2, where the federal funds rate equals the discount rate ( =l4). According to this graph, at point 2, borrowed reserves are: !3! A. equal to the distance between B and C. B. equal to the distance between A and B. C. equal to the distance between A and C D. zero.arrow_forwardThe U.S. money supply (M1) at the beginning of 2015 was $2,683.3 billion broken down as follows: $1,165.7 billion in currency, $3.5 billion in traveler's checks, and $1,514.1 billion in checking deposits. Suppose the Fed decided to increase the money supply by decreasing the reserve requirement from 11 percent to 10 percent. Assume all banks were initially loaned up (had no excess reserves) and the quantity of currency and traveler's checks held outside of banks did not change. How large a change in the money supply would have resulted from the change in the reserve requirement? The money supply would change by $ billion. (Round your response to two decimal places and include a minus sign if necessary.)arrow_forward
- Article Summary In a September 2013 speech to the Independent Bankers Association of Texas, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas president Richard Fisher stated that the Fed's credibility was harmed when it announced the previous week that it would continue its large bond purchasing program. In June, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had stated that that the program could begin to be cut back later in the year, and several other Fed officials expressed being open to the announced timing of this policy. Bernanke's change in his announced timeline of the Fed's intentions regarding the bond purchasing program brought criticism that the Fed had misled investors. In his speech, Fisher stated "I disagreed with the decision of the committee and argued against it. Doing nothing at this meeting would increase uncertainty about the future conduct of policy and call the credibility of our communications into question. I believe that is exactly what has occurred, though I take no…arrow_forwardWhile a television news reporter might state that “Today the Fed lowered the federal funds rate from 5.5 percent to 5.25 percent,” a more precise account of the Fed’s action would be as follows:  “Today the Fed told its bond traders to conduct open-market operations in such a way  that the equilibrium federal funds rate would decrease to 5.25 percent.” “Today the Fed lowered the discount rate by a quarter of a percentage point, and this action will force the federal funds rate to drop by the same amount.” “Today the Fed took steps to decrease the money supply by an amount that is sufficient to decrease the federal funds rate to 5.25 percent.” “Today the Fed took a step toward contracting aggregate demand, and this was done by lowering the federal funds rate to 5.25 percent.”arrow_forwardThe Fed's $2.2 trillion fire hose The Fed threw a lot of money at the financial crisis in 2008 to unfreeze credit markets and encourage economic activity. As part of its effort to keep the interest rate low, the Fed purchased government bonds worth $300 billion between March and September 2009. By October, the Fed held $770 billion in government securities, nearly double its pre-crisis total. Before the crisis, the Fed held mainly government securities, which it used to control the quantity of money in the economy. Now government securities make up just 35% of the Fed's balance sheet. Source: CNN Money, October 9, 2009 If government securities make up just 35 percent of the Fed's assets, calculate the Fed's total assets. What effect did the Fed's purchase of $300 billion of government bonds have on the Fed's total liabilities? If government securities make up 35 percent of the Fed's assets, then the Fed's total assets are $ The Fed's purchase of $300 billion of government bonds…arrow_forward
- If the Federal Reserve is targeting interest rates and money demand decreases, an appropriate policy response would be to: Increase reserve requirements. Decrease the discount rate. Purchase U.S. Treasury securities through government bond dealers. Decrease government spending.arrow_forwardOn March 26, 2020, the Federal Reserve abolished reserve requirements (the required reserve ratio = 0%). What two major considerations led the Fed take such an unprecedented actionarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning