To determine: The ways by which a top management can reduce the chances of their key managers pursuing their own self-interest at the cost of stockholders, employees and other stakeholders.
Explanation of Solution
Ways by which a top management can reduce the chances of their key managers pursuing their own self-interest at the cost of stockholders, employees and other stakeholders:
A company can use a strict corporate governance mechanism to watch their key managers getting involved in inappropriate actions. Monitor mechanism must be strictly implemented and must be communicated to avoid the unnecessary behavior. Code of conduct policies must be communicated throughout the organization by which unwanted behavior can be avoided.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Strategic Management: Concepts (Looseleaf) (Custom)
- Subject : Accounting In your opinion and your review of Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), which control do you feel should be a priority to protect those assets? Please answer using 100 words or more.arrow_forwardExplain the concept of “stakeholder management” in a publicly held corporation. Why shouldn’t managers be solely interested in stock-holder management, that is, maximizing the returns for owners of the firm – its shareholders? Explain the impact and include the zero- sum and symbiosis roles of stakeholder management in your answerarrow_forwardExplain how operating decisions of management may be affected by the probability of the firm`s technical insolvency and why the magnitude of the influence may depend on whether management is more self-interest-oriented or more shareholder-oriented.arrow_forward
- If one person is both the CEO and chairperson, what impact will this have on the firm or the stockholders?arrow_forwardOn Shareholder primacy theory, the managers’ responsibilities are to protect the interest of shareholders and to maximise the wealth of the shareholders. How are the stakeholders’ interests protected? Discussarrow_forwardCorporate raiders may now style themselves as "shareholder activists" but firms are no less worried. .Mr Bilzerian describes American corporate management in the 1980s as "uniformly horrible.". Companies had no regard for their shareholders, he says: "In 1985, Mr Icahn took over Trans World Airline, the now defunct American airline. He loaded it with debt, sold its most valuable flight routes and ground the airline into bankruptcy. He acquired a reputation of a corporate raider. By undertaking a hostile takeover, he generated substantial returns on his investments. A few high-profile raiders became famous in the 1980s making big profits for themselves but causing unrest and unemployment. Based on the case let, explain the concept of corporate raider by explaining how they operate, underlining their motive. Are they a necessary evil?Explainarrow_forward
- 1. Explain how the separation of ownership and control of corporations comes about and why it leads to problems. Do you think corporate governance is costly rigid?arrow_forwardWhy would the owner-manager be interested in the debt/asset ratio? Equity/asset ratio? be sure to explain what each ratio tells the owner-manager.arrow_forwardThe advent of professional managers was accompanied by skepticism regarding their trustworthiness and ethics in controlling large corporate assets on behalf of the shareholders. Today, this skepticism remains and has changed little since the founding of the managerial class a century ago, and new laws concerning appropriate governance, such as Sarbanes- Oxley, continue to be introduced. Why has this skepticism remained so strong?arrow_forward
- Consider critically how corporate governance is viewed and handled, as well as how significant it is, bearing in mind that trust, stakeholder activism, investor demand, and the social influence of corporations are all necessary components.arrow_forwardHow does Stakeholder helps the Maximization of Profit for the Shareholders? (Own words please)arrow_forwardCecilio K. Pedro – Lamoiyan Corporation Cecilio K. Pedro is another Filipino businessman of Chinese descent but his story is not the typical rags-to-riches tale but about turning adversity into triumph. He earned his business management degree at the Ateneo de Manila University, one of the more prestigious private schools in the Philippines. He once headed Aluminum Container, Inc. which was the major supplier of the collapsible aluminum toothpaste tubes that were formerly used by local manufacturers of Colgate-Palmolive, Procter and Gamble and the Philippine Refining Company (now Unilever). However, technological innovations and the environmental concerns over aluminum materials prompted the multinational companies to make use of the plastic- laminated toothpaste tubes as an alternative. As a result, Cecilio’s aluminum factory closed shop in 1985, but this didn’t stop him from exploring other ways to put his factory equipment into good use. Cecilio K Pedro decided to compete with…arrow_forward