The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

ACCT 660 Case 2: Accounting for Reorganization Copy and paste relevant FASB Codification sections/subsections/paragraphs (section/sub-section/paragraph numbers should show) and write an executive summary about accounting for reorganization. Do not focus on the scope exception. Do not copy the whole three digit section contents. This copy-and-paste part should not exceed four pages. Executive summary should be based on the FASB Codification contents you copied. Do not include your opinion or other information that’s not found in the copied paragraphs. The summary should not exceed one page (single spaced).

An accountant's judgments for each of the 5 steps in ASC 606 may be impacted by Covid-19. Question 15 options: True False

BLOCK C/2018/3 The date requirement for accounting documents is a GoB that is not codified by law. How can this principle be derived or deduced?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Answer 6

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Answer 7

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Answer 8

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

Answer 9

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

Answer 10

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Answer 11

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Answer 12

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

Answer 13

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

Answer 14

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

Answer 15

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

Answer 16

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Answer 17

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Answer 18

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Answer 19

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Answer 20

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Answer 21

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Answer 22

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

Answer 23

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

Answer 24

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

Answer 25

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

Answer 26

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Answer 27

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Answer 28

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 29

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 30

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 31

Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.1Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.2Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.3Q Ch. 13 - Do sellers recognize sales taxes as expenses on...Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.5Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.6Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.7Q Ch. 13 - What is a gam contingency? Is It accrued and...Ch. 13 - Do firms always accrue and record loss...Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.10Q

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Solution Summary: The author explains the difference between a provision under IFRS and one under US GAAP.

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 13 Solutions