Becky and Sarah are sisters 1who share a room. Their room can easily get messy, and their parents am always telling them to tidy it. Here are the costs and benefits to both Becky and Sarah, of taking the time to clean their room: If both Becky and Sarah clean, they each spends two hours and get a clean room. If Becky decides not to clean and Sarah does all the cleaning, then Sarah spends 10 hours cleaning (Becky spends 0) but Sarah is exhausted. The same would occur for Becky if Sarah decided not to clean—Becky spends 10 hours and becomes exhausted. If both girls decide not to clean, they both have a dirty room.
- What is the best outcome for Becky and Sarah? What is the worst outcome? (It would help you to construct a prisoner’s dilemma table.)
- Unfortunately, we know that the optimal outcome will most liker not happen, and that the sisters probably will choose the worst one instead. Explain what it is about Becky’s and Sarah’s reasoning that will lead them both to choose the worst outcome.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 13 Solutions
PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Construction Accounting And Financial Management (4th Edition)
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
Horngren's Accounting (11th Edition)
Principles of Management
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
- Bart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $10 and his value of the dog is $20. Lisa's value of the cat is $30 and her value of the dog is $10. 1. What is the efficient pet? Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. 2. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? 3. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose? 4. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is heads, what will Lisa choose? 5. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is tails, what will Bart choose?arrow_forwardBart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $20 and his value of the dog is $40. Lisa's value of the cat is $45 and her value of the dog is $15. 1. What is the efficient pet? Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. 2. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? 3. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose?arrow_forwardHubert and Manuel are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the water fountain or to keep that $300 for a cell phone. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Hubert and Manuel will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.70 of benefit. For example, if both Hubert and Manuel choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the water fountain. So, Hubert and Manuel would each receive $420 of benefit from the water fountain, and their combined benefit would be $840. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a cell phone is a private good, if Hubert chooses to spend $300 on a cell phone, Hubert would get $300 of benefit from the cell phone and Manuel wouldn't receive any benefit from Hubert's choice. If Hubert still spends $300 on a cell phone and Manuel chooses to…arrow_forward
- Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuelafrom Table 33.12 which describes how many barrelsof oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Usethese numbers to answer the rest of this question.a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for eachcountry. Assume there are 100 workers in eachcountry. Canadians and Venezuelans desire bothoil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000tons of lumber. Mark a point on their productionpossibilities where they can get at least 3,000tons.b. Assume that the Canadians specializecompletely because they figured out they havea comparative advantage in lumber. They arewilling to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. Howmuch oil should they ask for in return for thislumber to be as well off as they were with notrade? How much should they ask for if theywant to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note:We can think of this “ask” as the relative price ortrade price of lumber.c. Is the Canadian “ask” you identified in (b) alsobeneficial for Venezuelans? Use the…arrow_forwardBart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $10 and his value of the dog is $40. Lisa's value of the cat is $30 and her value of the dog is $20. a. What is the efficient pet? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. b. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] c. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] d. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is heads, what will Lisa choose?…arrow_forwardJuanita and Neha are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the water fountain or to keep that $300 for a weekend getaway. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Juanita and Neha will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.70 of benefit. For example, if both Juanita and Neha choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the water fountain. So, Juanita and Neha would each receive $420 of benefit from the water fountain, and their combined benefit would be $840. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a weekend getaway is a private good, if Juanita chooses to spend $300 on a weekend getaway, Juanita would get $300 of benefit from the weekend getaway and Neha wouldn't receive any benefit from Juanita's choice. If Juanita still spends $300 on a weekend getaway…arrow_forward
- Beth and Eleanor are considering contributing toward the creation of a building mural. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the building mural or to keep that $400 for a weekend getaway. Since a building mural is a public good, both Beth and Eleanor will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.60 of benefit. For example, if both Beth and Eleanor choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the building mural. So, Beth and Eleanor would each receive $480 of benefit from the building mural, and their combined benefit would be $960. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a weekend getaway is a private good, if Beth chooses to spend $400 on a weekend getaway, Beth would get $400 of benefit from the weekend getaway and Eleanor wouldn't receive any benefit from Beth's choice. If Beth still spends $400 on a weekend getaway and…arrow_forwardPaolo and Van are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the water fountain or to keep that $400 for a weekend getaway. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Paolo and Van will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of benefit. For example, if both Paolo and Van choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the water fountain. So, Paolo and Van would each receive $640 of benefit from the water fountain, and their combined benefit would be $1,280. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a weekend getaway is a private good, if Paolo chooses to spend $400 on a weekend getaway, Paolo would get $400 of benefit from the weekend getaway and Van wouldn't receive any benefit from Paolo's choice. If Paolo still spends $400 on a weekend getaway and Van chooses to…arrow_forwardSuppose that a surfboard designer owns a building and is renting part of the building's space to a doctor. Further suppose that because the surfboard designer is the owner, he has the right to make noise during the day while he sands the boards. While the doctor cannot insist on a quiet environment, the doctor could move to a quieter building. However, rent in the next best building is $400/month more than rent in the noisy building. The surfboard designer can adopt a new technology that eliminates the noise for $325/month. Given this situation, can the doctor find a private solution with the surfboard designer that will make both better off? What is the minimum and maximum payment the doctor would make to the surfboard designer to get the doctor to install the noise-reducing equipment? NOTE: Round your answers to the nearest dollar. Minimum: $ Maximum: $arrow_forward
- Hubert, Manuel, and Shen are fishermen who live next to a lake that is open to fishing; in other words, anyone is free to use the lake for fishing. Assume that these men are the only three fishermen who fish in this lake and that the lake is large enough for all three fishermen to fish intensively at the same time. Each year, the fishermen choose independently how many fish to catch; specifically, they choose whether to fish intensively (that is, to place several fishing lines in the water for long periods of time, which hurts the sustainability of the lake if enough people do it) or to fish nonintensively (which does not hurt the sustainability of the lake). None of them has the ability to control how much the others fish, and each fisherman cares only about his own profitability and not about the state of the lake. Assume that as long as no more than one fisherman fishes intensively, there are enough fish to restock the lake. However, if two or more fish intensively, the lake will…arrow_forwardThere are two fishermen, Zach and Jacob. They would each benefit if lighthouses were built along the coast where they fish. The marginal cost of building a lighthouse is $100. The marginal benefit that Zach gets from each lighthouse is 90 - Q, where Q is the number of lighthouses. The marginal benefit that Jacob gets from each lighthouse is 40 - Q. 1. What is the efficient number of lighthouses? 2. What is Zach's marginal benefit of lighthouses at the efficient quantity? 3. Would Zach have been willing to pay for the last additional lighthouse at the efficient quantity? a) Yes b) Noarrow_forwardFive roommates are planning to spend the weekend in their dorm room watching movies, and they are debating how many movies to watch. Here is their willingness to pay: Willingness to Pay (Dollars) Yakov Charles Gilberto Lorenzo Sam First film 18 15 10 8 5 Second film 16 12 8 5 1 Third film 14 9 6 0 0 Fourth film 12 6 3 0 0 Fifth film 10 3 0 0 0 Buying a DVD costs $20, which the roommates split equally, so each pays $4 per movie. The efficient number of movies to watch (that is, the number that maximizes total surplus) is movies. Complete the following table by indicating the preferred number of movies from the standpoint of each roommate. Roommate 0 1 2 3 4 5 Yakov Charles Gilberto Lorenzo Sam The median roommate prefers movies. Suppose the roommates…arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax