BUSINESS LAW
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780357007594
Author: Mann
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 4Q
Summary Introduction
Given situation:
This case is relating to the concept of violation of public policy, tortious conduct. An agreement allowing an individual to commit a misdemeanour is an unlawful and unenforceable agreement. This sort of agreement is considered to go against public policy.
To discuss: The decision for person A.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Jose buys a jet ski for his 16-year-old son, Carlos. Carlos does not like it and Jose seeks to
rescind his purchase since the Jet Ski was to be used by a minor. Explain whether or not Jose
will be successful?
John works as an engineer for a technological company, and Maria works as a sales
executive for a competitor business. Maria reminded John that her profession
contains sensitive information, and she cautions him not to reveal anything he learns
from her work to anyone.
While attending a conference, John overheard two executives from Maria's company
discussing a new product launch. He chooses to buy a modest amount of Maria's
company's shares, intending to profit from the predicted increase in the company's
stock price following the product launch. John double-checked his company's
regulations to ensure that there was no conflict of interest or limitation on the
purchase.
However, as a result of unanticipated factors, the product introduction was delayed,
and the stock price of Maria's company fell instead. Instead of the predicted profit,
John's investment resulted in a loss.
Question :
In the view of conflict of interest of ethics in financial analysis, state the key points of
the…
Apollina, a successful model and actress, hires Isaac, an experienced Hollywood agent, to negotiate
her movie deals. Isaac is on a golf course with Eunice, an executive at a Hollywood Studio, and the
two get into a physical fight regarding Apollina's demands. Eunice sues Isaac for damages related to
the fight. Who is responsible for Eunice's damages?
Q Isaac because he was acting as an agent on behalf of Apollina.
O Both Apollina and Isaac because they were both involved.
Apollina, because she sent Isaac.
O Neither Isaac nor Apollina if Eunice was acting as the Hollywood Studio's agent.
O Isaac is responsible for his own lorts.
Chapter 13 Solutions
BUSINESS LAW
Ch. 13 - Prob. 1COCh. 13 - Prob. 2COCh. 13 - Prob. 3COCh. 13 - Prob. 4COCh. 13 - Prob. 5COCh. 13 - Prob. 1QCh. 13 - Prob. 2QCh. 13 - Prob. 3QCh. 13 - Prob. 4QCh. 13 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 13 - Prob. 6QCh. 13 - Prob. 7QCh. 13 - Prob. 8QCh. 13 - Prob. 9QCh. 13 - Prob. 10QCh. 13 - Prob. 12CPCh. 13 - Prob. 13CPCh. 13 - Prob. 14CPCh. 13 - Prob. 15CPCh. 13 - Prob. 16CPCh. 13 - Prob. 17CPCh. 13 - Prob. 18CPCh. 13 - Prob. 19CPCh. 13 - Prob. 20CPCh. 13 - Prob. 21CPCh. 13 - Prob. 22CPCh. 13 - Prob. 23CPCh. 13 - Prob. 1TSCh. 13 - Prob. 2TSCh. 13 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- John works as an engineer for a technological company, and Maria works as a sales executive for a competitor business. Maria reminded John that her profession contains sensitive information, and she cautions him not to reveal anything he learns from her work to anyone. While attending a conference, John overheard two executives from Maria's company discussing a new product launch. He chooses to buy a modest amount of Maria's company's shares, intending to profit from the predicted increase in the company's stock price following the product launch. John double-checked his company's regulations to ensure that there was no conflict of interest or limitation on the purchase. However, as a result of unanticipated factors, the product introduction was delayed, and the stock price of Maria's company fell instead. Instead of the predicted profit, John's investment resulted in a loss. Question : Explain whether "Unacceptable" is correct or incorrect with respect to the relevant Standard. State…arrow_forwardRonald D. Johnson is a former employee of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). As part of a downsizing effort, IBM discharged Johnson. In exchange for an enhanced severance package, Johnson signed a written release and covenant not to sue IBM. IBM’s downsizing plan provided that surplus personnel were eligible to receive benefits, including outplacement assistance, career counseling, job retraining, and an enhanced separation allowance. These employees were eligible, at IBM’s discretion, to receive a separation allowance of two weeks’ pay. However, employees who signed a release could be eligible for an enhanced severance allowance equal to one week’s pay for each six months of accumulated service with a maximum of twenty-six weeks’ pay. Surplus employees could also apply for alternate, generally lower-paying, manufacturing positions. Johnson opted for the release and received the maximum twentysix weeks’ pay. He then alleged, among other claims, that IBM subjected him to…arrow_forwardOliver enters into a written contract with Jinali for the purchase of organic produce. Oliver later learns that none of the produce is organic and that Jinali had used cheap, dangerous pesticides on the produce. How should the contract be characterized? O The contract is voidable. The contract is unenforceable. O The contract is valid. The contract violates the statute of frauds. The contract is void.arrow_forward
- Agents and employees of Deco Arts Corporation and Echo Imitations Inc. are convicted of conspiring to violate a federal law that is punishable by a term of imprisonment and a fine. Can the corporations be held liable for these crimes? If so, how can they be punished?arrow_forwardJamie, who works as a conveyancer at your organisation, was acting on behalf of a client who was selling their property. You find out that the conveyancer was receiving kickbacks for recommending clients to a certain developer. While the gifts were not monetary, they were significant. Over the course of a couple of months, Jamie received: A fully paid trip to Fiji sponsored by the developer Two tickets to see Jimmy Barnes at his next show The conveyancer did not disclose to the client that they were also acting for the developer when they made the recommendation to go with the developer. Apply the key principles and responsibilities of codes of conduct to this scenario and explain why Jamie is in breach of them and advise the relevant regulation.arrow_forwardRobert applies to Northern National Bank for a loan. Prior to granting the loan, Northern requests that Callis Credit Agency provide it with a credit report on Robert. Callis reports that three years earlier, Robert had embezzled money from his employer. Based on this report, Northern rejects Robert’s loan application. a. Robert demands to know why, but Northern refuses to divulge the information, arguing that it is privileged. Is Robert entitled to the information? b. Assume that Robert obtains the information and alleges that it is inaccurate. What recourse does Robert have?arrow_forward
- Trusted EmployeeFine Works Pavers hired Sharp as a part-time bookkeeper in December 2005, and the owner was so pleased with her performance that he offered her a full-time position the next year. John Travolta, the owner of Fine Works Pavers, grew up on a farm. He did not attend college but had a knack for business. His construction company had grown tremendously when the economy was booming.Over the years, he purchased and sold several businesses, and “as a result, he controlled approximately a dozen companies, each with their own financials in an enterprise that grossed $25 million a year.”Sharp was a trusted employee and soon was overseeing the finances of four companies. However, Sharp was having difficulty paying the rent and fearing eviction, she stole her first $750 from her employer, and no one noticed. From there, it escalated. She started small, but by 2009 she had taken nearly $460,000. She would come to work dressed as she always had and lived in a modest home. Her only…arrow_forwardTrusted EmployeeFine Works Pavers hired Sharp as a part-time bookkeeper in December 2005, and the owner was so pleased with her performance that he offered her a full-time position the next year. John Travolta, the owner of Fine Works Pavers, grew up on a farm. He did not attend college but had a knack for business. His construction company had grown tremendously when the economy was booming.Over the years, he purchased and sold several businesses, and “as a result, he controlled approximately a dozen companies, each with their own financials in an enterprise that grossed $25 million a year.”Sharp was a trusted employee and soon was overseeing the finances of four companies. However, Sharp was having difficulty paying the rent and fearing eviction, she stole her first $750 from her employer, and no one noticed. From there, it escalated. She started small, but by 2009 she had taken nearly $460,000. She would come to work dressed as she always had and lived in a modest home. Her only…arrow_forwardMitzi is about to graduate from UF and has just signed her first contract for employment with a private company, PPC. Mitzi realizes that there is a clause in her contract, drafted by PPC, that prohibits her from speaking about the trade secrets that PPC uses. Mitzi believes that this clause violates rights under the First Amendment. Therefore, Mitzi tells some of her friends at school about the company and the wording of the contract; however, she does not say anything else about PPC, its customers, or what it does. Mitzi does not know that her friend Juliet's father is the head of PPC. Juliet tells her father about what Mitzi has said, and he immediately fires Mitzi. Would Mitzi have a case against PPC under the rights granted in the First Amendment? O No, company policy prohibits speaking about the trade secrets, and this is not protected by the First Amendment. O No, because Mitzi could only bring a case for abusive discharge, retaliation, or defamation; neither she nor PPC could…arrow_forward
- By holding a knife to his back, Ed compelled Sean to sign a contract advantageous to Ed. This contract was entered under: 8888 false representation. improper threats. physical duress. undue influence.arrow_forwardMark Clapp and Albert DiBrito worked for the Public Safety Department (PSD) in St. Joseph, Michigan. Clapp was the director and, DiBrito was the deputy director. They were under the supervision of the city manager. One day, Clapp told Tom Vaught, a PSD employee, that the previous city manager had hired DiBrito only because DİBrito had been investigating the city manager for possible wrongdoing. Clapp said that DiBrito had dropped his investigation in exchange for the deputy director position. DiBrito learned of Clapp's statement and filed a formal complaint against him on another matter with Richard Lewis, the current city manager. The investigation that followed revealed management problems within the PSD. A consultant hired by the city concluded that Clapp's remarks about DiBrito had been "inappropriate statements for a commanding officer to make regarding a second in charge." However, the consultant also identified issues regarding DiBrito's "honesty, inappropriate statements to…arrow_forwardGoodward, a newly-hired newspaper reporter for The Cape Cod News, learned that the local cranberry growers had made an agreement under which they pooled their cranberry crops each year and sold them at what they determined to be a fair price. Goodward believes that such an agreement is in restraint of trade and a violation of the antitrust laws. Is he correct?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON