Given situation: This case is relating to the concept of common law restraint of trade. Since the public benefits from vigorous competition, contracts that limit trade unreasonably are illegal. To discuss: Whether person L will able to enforce the provisions of contract.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 6Q

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

This case is relating to the concept of common law restraint of trade. Since the public benefits from vigorous competition, contracts that limit trade unreasonably are illegal.

To discuss: Whether person L will able to enforce the provisions of contract.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Anne Robertson obtained telescopes from the See-Well Optics Company at dealer prices on the pretense of being a dealer in optical equipment. See-Well later determined that Robertson was not, had never been, and did not plan to be a dealer in optics. By the time these facts emerged, Robertson had succeeded in selling the telescopes to several individuals located throughout the country. These buyers had responded to advertisements placed by Robertson, who again had represented herself as a dealer in optical equipment. The buyers had purchased the telescopes in good faith at prices consistent with comparable equipment. See-Well located these buyers and demanded that the telescopes be returned as property obtained through fraud. Do the buyers of these telescopes have to return their purchases?

David E. Ross, his two brothers, and their families operated and owned the entire stock of five businesses. Ross had three children: Rod, David II, and Betsy. David II and Betsy were not involved in the operation of the companies, but Rod began working for one of the firms, Equitable Life and Casualty Insurance Company, in 2007. Between 2009 and 2013, the elder Ross informed a number of persons of his desire to reward Rod for his work with Equitable Life by giving him stock in addition to the stock he would inherit. He subsequently executed several stock transfers to Rod, representing shares in various family businesses, which were reflected by appropriate entries on the corporate books. Certificates were issued in Rod’s name and placed in an envelope identified with the name Rod Ross, but they were kept with the other family stock certificates in an office safe to which Rod did not have access. In all, one-fourth of the stock holdings of David E. Ross were transferred to Rod in this…

John worked as a sales representative for ABC Corporation for five years. During his time there, he signed a non-compete agreement, which stated that if he left the company, he would not work for a competing company within a 50-mile radius for two years. After five years, John decided to leave ABC Corporation and start his own business selling similar products. He opened his business just 20 miles away from ABC Corporation's headquarters. ABC Corporation filed a lawsuit against John, claiming that he violated the non-compete agreement and was taking away their customers. Questions: Is the non-compete agreement enforceable in this case? Is the 50-mile radius reasonable? Is John's new business considered a competitor to ABC Corporation?