Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property. To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Question

1) A black firefighter alleges that each time he is transferred from one fire station to another, he must take his bed with him, on orders of the fire chief. The fire chief defends on the basis that it is a legitimate decision because white firefighters would not want to sleep in the same bed in which a black firefighter slept. Is this illegal under Title VII? Explain 2) A white college receptionist is fired when it is found that she told a black college applicant that the applications for admissions are distinguished by race by the notation of a small Rh in the corner of black applicants’ applications.”Rh,”she says, is her supervisor’s term for “raisin heads, “which he calls African-Americans. Is this employee entitled to reinstatement? 3) jose and Cesar, both Hispanic, are carpenters employed by a contractor to help build an office building in Maryland. While working, Jose and Cesar discover that they are being paid less than non-Hispanic employees. In addition, they allege a hostile…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.

To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

1) A black firefighter alleges that each time he is transferred from one fire station to another, he must take his bed with him, on orders of the fire chief. The fire chief defends on the basis that it is a legitimate decision because white firefighters would not want to sleep in the same bed in which a black firefighter slept. Is this illegal under Title VII? Explain 2) A white college receptionist is fired when it is found that she told a black college applicant that the applications for admissions are distinguished by race by the notation of a small Rh in the corner of black applicants’ applications.”Rh,”she says, is her supervisor’s term for “raisin heads, “which he calls African-Americans. Is this employee entitled to reinstatement? 3) jose and Cesar, both Hispanic, are carpenters employed by a contractor to help build an office building in Maryland. While working, Jose and Cesar discover that they are being paid less than non-Hispanic employees. In addition, they allege a hostile…

Trevor Rowe a well known businessman saw an article in the gleaner that indicated that he was a jail bird. As a result, he lost customers. He wrote to the gleaner, seeking a retraction of the story, and found out that there was in fact another man in the community with the same name who had gone to jail. What is the position of either party? The Gleaner can prevent litigation by offering to make amends. The Gleaner doesn’t have to retract the story as it was true for one of the men. There is no action as the story was already published. The businessman can go straight to Court. There is no action at there are two persons with the same name.

1. Wong, a Mathematics teacher made an advertisement in her facebook for Mathematics tuition with a ‘Money back guarantee for those who did not get an “A” in the SPM examination”. Shah enrolled his daughter, Teyha to Wong’s tuition class. When Teyha sat for the SPM examination, she obtained a “B” for her Mathematics paper. Shah went to see Wong and demanded that he return the tuition fees that he paid him. Wong refuses to return the fees to Shah. a. Advise Shah in this matters. b. In the course of your answer, explain FOUR (4) situations that may lead to invitation to treat. Support your answers with Contracts Act 1950 and decided cases.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.

To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.

To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.

To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 5

Chapter 13, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.

To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.

Answer 6

Chapter 13, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.

To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Answer 7

Chapter 13, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.

To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.

Answer 8

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.

Answer 9

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.

Answer 10

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.

To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.

Answer 12

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 13

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 14

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 15

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 16

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 17

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 18

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 19

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 20

Trending now

Answer 21

This is a popular solution!

Answer 22

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 23

Ch. 13 - Prob. 1RE Ch. 13 - Prob. 2RE Ch. 13 - Prob. 3RE Ch. 13 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 13 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 13 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 13 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 13 - Prob. 2BS Ch. 13 - Prob. 3BCP Ch. 13 - Prob. 4BCP

Solution Summary: The author explains that person T showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The contract states that the buyer is liable for paying the fees of the real estate broker.

Chapter 13 Solutions