Given situation: This case is relating to the concept of violations of public policy. An agreement allowing an individual to commit a misdemeanour is an unlawful and unenforceable agreement. This sort of agreement is considered to go against public policy. To discuss: The decision for person B.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 9Q

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

This case is relating to the concept of violations of public policy. An agreement allowing an individual to commit a misdemeanour is an unlawful and unenforceable agreement. This sort of agreement is considered to go against public policy.

To discuss: The decision for person B.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

13) When husband and wife live together, the law implies that the wife is authorized to use her husband's credit for necessaries suited to their style of living. Based on the above situation, the husband is an agent and the wife is a principal. a) True b) False 14) The person who gave assistance in agency relationship is known as agent. a) True b) False 15) The governing law for contract of sales is Sale of Goods Act 1957. a) True b) False 16) Goods means every kind of immovable property other than actionable claims and money. a) True b) False 17) Faiz meets Farhan, a car dealer and tells him that he wants a car that can move 20km/liter Farhan promotes one of the cars in the showroom and says that it suits the purpose. Faiz buys the car by relying on Farhan's representation. Subsequently Faiz finds that the car can move 15km/liter The above situation is an example of breach of warranty. a) True b) False

Textile Inc. sells goods to United Stores in exchange for a note signed by the buyer. Textile sells the note to Valley Finance Company. In this situation, transfer warranties arise because a. Valley has no knowledge of any bankruptcy proceedings against United. b. the signatures on the note were authentic and authorized. c. Textiles did not alter the note. d. the note was transferred for consideration.

Al, the owner of Fitness Corp., a manufacturer of gym equipment, calls Bob, the owner of Bob's Gym. During the conversation, Al offers to sell Bob an assortment of 100 dumbells, of different weights and sizes, for $600.00. After the phone call, Al sends Bob an email confirming their conversation. Since Al and Bob never signed a contract, their agreement is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds. True False