MICROECONOMICS W/CONNECT >IC<
20th Edition
ISBN: 9781259890031
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13.A, Problem 2AP
Sub part (a):
To determine
How monopolistic competition differs from pure competition.
Sub part (b):
To determine
How monopolistic competition differs from pure competition.
Sub part (c):
To determine
How monopolistic competition differs from pure competition.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider a “punishment” variation of the two-firm oligopoly situation shown in Figure 14.1. Suppose that if one firm sets a low price while the other sets a high price, then the firm setting the high price can fine the firm setting the low price. Suppose that whenever a fine is imposed, X dollars is taken from the low-price firm and given to the high-price firm. What is the smallest amount that the fine X can be such that both firms will want to always set the high price?
Suppose your firm competes against another firm for customers. You and your rival know your products will be obsolete at the end of the year and must simultaneously determine whether or not to advertise. In your industry, advertising does not increase total industry demand but instead induces consumers to switch among the products of different firms. Thus, if both you and your rival advertise, the two advertising campaigns will simply offset each other, and you will each earn $4 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn $10 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other one does not, the firm that advertises will earn $20 million and the firm that does not advertise will earn $1 million in profits. Is your profit-maximizing choice to advertise or not to advertise? How much money do you expect to earn?
Consider Firm A and Firm B, each with cost functions C(qA) = 5qA, and C(qB) = 5qB, The inverse market demand is given by p = 30 − Q, where Q = qA + qB represents the total quantity demanded in the market.
a) Suppose the firms compete in a Cournot oligopoly model. What are the quantities supplied by each firm and their profits?
b) Now let Firm A be the first-mover. If the firms compete in a Stackelberg oligopoly model, what are the quantities supplied by each firm and their profits?
c) How can you interpret the difference in profits between parts (a) and (b)? In other words, if you were Firm A, which scenario would you prefer, and what might this say in general?
Chapter 13 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS W/CONNECT >IC<
Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 13.1 - Prob. 2QQCh. 13.1 - Prob. 3QQCh. 13.1 - Prob. 4QQCh. 13.4 - Prob. 1QQCh. 13.4 - The D2e segment of the demand curve D2eD1 in graph...Ch. 13.4 - Prob. 3QQCh. 13.4 - Prob. 4QQCh. 13.A - Prob. 1ADQCh. 13.A - Prob. 2ADQ
Ch. 13.A - Prob. 3ADQCh. 13.A - Prob. 4ADQCh. 13.A - Prob. 1ARQCh. 13.A - Prob. 2ARQCh. 13.A - Prob. 3ARQCh. 13.A - Prob. 1APCh. 13.A - Prob. 2APCh. 13 - Prob. 1DQCh. 13 - Prob. 2DQCh. 13 - Prob. 3DQCh. 13 - Prob. 4DQCh. 13 - Prob. 5DQCh. 13 - Prob. 6DQCh. 13 - Prob. 7DQCh. 13 - Prob. 8DQCh. 13 - Prob. 9DQCh. 13 - Prob. 10DQCh. 13 - Prob. 11DQCh. 13 - Prob. 12DQCh. 13 - Prob. 13DQCh. 13 - Prob. 1RQCh. 13 - Prob. 2RQCh. 13 - Prob. 3RQCh. 13 - Prob. 4RQCh. 13 - Prob. 5RQCh. 13 - Prob. 6RQCh. 13 - Prob. 7RQCh. 13 - Prob. 8RQCh. 13 - Prob. 1PCh. 13 - Prob. 2PCh. 13 - Prob. 3P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that the pricing strategies for FiberOne and of Starlink are shown in the table below. They have to decide whether to charge a high or low price for their internet service. The four pairs of payoff values show what each company expects to earn or lose in millions of dollars, depending on what the other company does.FiberOne’s Price StrategyStarlink’s Price StrategyHigh Price Low PriceHigh Price Starlink+$200 FiberOne +$200 Starlink+$500 FiberOne - $100Low Price Starlink-$100 FiberOne + 500 Starlink+$100 FiberOne +$100If it’s expected that the incomes of people living in rural Nigeria is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus?a) a) Starlink will charge a low price; FiberOne will charge a high price.b) b) Starlink will charge a high price; FiberOne will charge a low price.c) c) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a low price.d) d) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a high price.arrow_forwardConsider a duopolistic market in which the two identical firms compete by selecting their quantities. The inverse market demand is P(Q) = 210−Q and each firm has a marginal cost of $15 per unit. Assume that fixed costs are negligible for both firms. Cournot Model Determine the Nash-Cournot equilibrium for this market.(Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) Firm 1's quantity: q1= ? units. Firm 2's quantity: q2 = ? units. Market price: P= ? Stackelberg Model Determine the Nash-Stackelberg equilibrium for this market, assuming that Firm 1 is the Stackelberg leader. (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) Firm 1's quantity: q1 = ? units Firm 2s quantity: q2 = ? units. Market price: P = ?arrow_forwardIn the market for video game consoles, Microsoft and Sony are essentially a duopoly, with Nintendo at a distant third. Consider a purely hypothetical game in which the executives of the two companies are deciding how much they will spend on advertising. To simplify, assume that they can either spend a lot or spend a little. If both firms spend a lot, Sony's hypothetical profit will be $2 billion and Microsoft's hypothetical profit will be $1 billion. If they both spend a little, Sony's profit will be $9 billion and Microsoft's profit will be $7 billion. If Sony spends a lot and Microsoft spends a little, Sony's profit will be $8 billion and Microsoft's profit will be $2 billion. Finally, if Sony spends a little and Microsoft spends a lot, Sony's profit will be $3 billion and Microsoft's profit will be $6 billion. Create the payoff matrix for this game. Does Sony have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Does Microsoft have a dominant strategy? If so, what is…arrow_forward
- Suppose Telkomsel and Indosat are the only two firms in the internet market. They face the following payoff when the want to invest in the research budget: When both companies invest in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 40 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 50 billion. When both of them invest in large budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 20 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 30 billion. When Telkomsel invest in large budget and Indosat in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 30 billion and Indosat will gain zero. When Telkomsel invest in small budget and Indosat in large budget, Telkomsel will gain zero and Indosat will gain Rp 70 billion. a). Draw the payoff matrix b). Is there a Nash Equilibrium for that case? Explain.arrow_forwardSometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as shown in the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table 5. Firm B colludes with Firm A Firm B cheats by selling more output Firm A colludes with Firm B A gets $1,000, B gets $100 A gets $800, B gets $200 Firm A cheats by selling more output A gets $1,050, B gets $50 A gets $500, B gets $20 Assuming that the payoffs are known to both firms, what is the likely outcome in this case?arrow_forwardTwo firms in a duopolistic industry produce outputs 91 and q₂ at a constant and equal marginal cost of 2. The inverse market demand curve is given by p = 14 - (q_{1} + q_{2}) for price per unit p. Consider the Stackelberg duopolistic game where firm 1 is an incumbent monopoly acting as a leader and firm 2 is a potential entrant that faces a fixed cost F = 16 if it enters and competes in the market. What is the outcome of the Stackelberg leader-follower game in this case? 92 =arrow_forward
- Suppose there is a remote stretch of highway along which two restaurants, Last Chance Café and Desolate Diner, operate in a duopoly. Neither restaurant invests in keeping up with health code regulations, but regardless they both have customers as they are the only dining options along a 79-mile portion of the road. Both restaurants know that if they clean up and comply with health codes they will attract more customers, but this also means that they will have to pay workers to do the cleaning. If neither restaurant cleans, each will earn $10,000; alternatively, if they both hire workers to clean, each will earn only $7,000. However, if one cleans and the other doesn't, more customers will choose the cleaner restaurant; the cleaner restaurant will make $15,000, and the other restaurant will make only $3,000. Complete the following payoff matrix using the information just given. (Note: Last Chance Café and Desolate Diner are both profit-maximizing firms.) Desolate Diner…arrow_forwardPlease help with these two: 1. Consider a Duopoly model, in which two firms decide a quantity simultaneously. If they collude (setting the total quantity together), then each firm can earn (higher, or lower) profit than in the Cournot equilibrium. 2. Consider a collusion with two firms. The joint profit is maximized by setting quantity and price together. Each firm sells the agreed amount. However, believing that the other firm sells the agreed amount, there is always a temptation for the firm sell (more, or less) than the agreed amount.arrow_forwardSuppose that an oligopolistic is charging $21 per unit of output and selling 31 units each day. What is its daily total revenue? Also suppose that previously it had lowered its price from $21 to $19, rivals matched the price cut, and the firm’s sales increased from 31 to 32 units. It also previously raised its price from $21 to $23, rivals ignored the price hike, and the firm’s daily total revenue came in at $482. Which of the following is most logical to conclude? The firm’s demand curve is (a) inelastic over the $21 to $23 price range, (b) elastic over the $19 to $21 price range, (c) a linear(straight) down sloping line, or (d) a curve with a kink in it?arrow_forward
- Consider an oligopolistic industry with N competing firms. Suppose that these firms have no fixed costs and that they all have the same marginal costs. Each firm must choose what quantity to produce independently of each other, and all firms must choose at the same time. If we increase the number of firms in this industry (to for example N+1), the market price a.increases b.decreases c.remains unchanged d.becomes nil e.none of the abovearrow_forwardThree oligopolistic firms ("1", "2" and "3") conduct quantity competition in a certain market. The interactions between them take place as follows: firm 1 defines its production quantity, which is immediately observed by firms 2 and 3; then, firm 2 makes its decision on how much it will produce, and only after observing the decisions of firms 1 and 2 does firm 3 finally make its respective choice. Furthermore, the total costs of firms 1, 2 and 3 correspond respectively to c₁(q₁) = 10q₁, c₂(q₂) = 8q₂ and c₃(q₃) = 2q₃, and the firms face a (inverse) demand given by p(Q) = 110 - Q (where Q = q₁ + q₂ + q₃). Based on this information, determine what will be the total amount produced by the firms in the (single) ENPS for that game. (Note: the correct answer is an integer.)arrow_forwardAlcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs. Will Kaiser cooperate or cheat? Explain.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning