Person W was threatened with foreclosure of her home for her mortgage in default. She decided to sell the house. Persons M learned about this and agreed to pay off her debt in return for the sale of house and consideration of $17,000. They signed a contract of sale which stated the purchase price to be $1,800 and not $18,000. Person W contacted an attorney few hours later to declare the said contract to be void on account of her intoxication during signing the contract. To discuss: Whether person W can set aside the sale on account of her intoxication and her mental weakness.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 17CP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person W was threatened with foreclosure of her home for her mortgage in default. She decided to sell the house. Persons M learned about this and agreed to pay off her debt in return for the sale of house and consideration of $17,000. They signed a contract of sale which stated the purchase price to be $1,800 and not $18,000. Person W contacted an attorney few hours later to declare the said contract to be void on account of her intoxication during signing the contract.

To discuss: Whether person W can set aside the sale on account of her intoxication and her mental weakness.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Sheila owned an old roadside building that she believed could be easily converted into an antique shop. She talked to her friend Barbara, an antique fancier, and they executed the following written agreement: a. Sheila would supply the building, all utilities, and $100,000 capital for purchasing antiques. b. Barbara would supply $30,000 for purchasing antiques, Sheila would repay her when the business terminated. c. Barbara would manage the shop, make all purchases, and receive a salary of $500 per week plus 5 percent of the gross receipts. d. Fifty percent of the net profits would go into the purchase of new stock. The balance of the net profits would go to Sheila. e. The business would operate under the name “Roadside Antiques.” Business went poorly, and after one year, a debt of $40,000 is owed to Old Fashioned, Inc., the principal supplier of antiques purchased by Barbara in the name of Roadside Antiques. Old Fashioned sues Roadside Antiques, and Sheila and Barbara as partners.…

David E. Ross, his two brothers, and their families operated and owned the entire stock of five businesses. Ross had three children: Rod, David II, and Betsy. David II and Betsy were not involved in the operation of the companies, but Rod began working for one of the firms, Equitable Life and Casualty Insurance Company, in 2007. Between 2009 and 2013, the elder Ross informed a number of persons of his desire to reward Rod for his work with Equitable Life by giving him stock in addition to the stock he would inherit. He subsequently executed several stock transfers to Rod, representing shares in various family businesses, which were reflected by appropriate entries on the corporate books. Certificates were issued in Rod’s name and placed in an envelope identified with the name Rod Ross, but they were kept with the other family stock certificates in an office safe to which Rod did not have access. In all, one-fourth of the stock holdings of David E. Ross were transferred to Rod in this…

On March 1, Lucas called Craig on the telephone and offered to pay him $190,000 for a house and lot that Craig owned. Craig accepted the offer immediately on the telephone. Later in the same day, Lucas told Annabelle that if she would marry him, he would convey to her the property he then owned, which was the subject of the earlier agreement. On March 2, Lucas called Penelope and offered her $25,000 if she would work for him for the year commencing March 15, and she agreed. Lucas and Annabelle were married on June 25. By this time, Craig had refused to convey the house to Lucas. Thereafter, Lucas renounced his promise to convey the property to Annabelle. Penelope, who had been working for Lucas, was discharged without cause on July 5; Annabelle left Lucas and instituted divorce proceedings. What rights, if any, have— a. Lucas against Craig for his failure to convey the property? b. Annabelle against Lucas for failure to convey the house to her? c. Penelope against Lucas for discharging…