Principles of Micoroeconomics, Student Value Edition
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780133024265
Author: Karl E. Case
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 2P
To determine
Reason out why brand-name pharmaceutical manufacturers would want to enter into agreements using the five force model.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Recently, Pfizer and Allergan—the makers of Viagra and Botox, respectively—initiated a $160 billion merger. Pharmaceutical companies tend to spend a greater percentage of sales on R&D activities than other industries. The government encourages these R&D activities by granting companies patents for drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration. For instance, Allergan spent large sums of money developing its popular wrinkle-removing neurotoxin, Botox, which is currently protected under a patent. Botox sells for about $15 per vial. Calculate the Lerner index if the marginal cost of producing Botox is $1.50 per vial. Does the Lerner index make sense in this situation?
Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn $100. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn $150. If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn $0 and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn $200. Table represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner’s dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? A = Work independently; B = Cooperate and Lower Output
Milly and Rob are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn $100. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn $150. If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn $0 and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn $200. The table represents the choices available to Milly and Rob. What is the dominant strategy for Milly ?
Milly Keeps Producing
Milly Lowers Output
Rob Keeps Producing
$100, $100
$200, $0
Rob Lowers Output
$0, $200
$150, $150
Group of answer choices
Milly should keep producing
Milly should work independently from Rob
Mily should lower output
Chapter 14 Solutions
Principles of Micoroeconomics, Student Value Edition
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In January 2007, XM enjoyed about 58 percent of satellite radio subscribers, and Sirius had the remaining 42 percent. Both firms were suffering losses, despite their dominance in the satellite radio market. In 2008, the DOJ decided not to challenge a merger, and these two firms united to become Sirius XM. If you were an economic consultant for Sirius, what economic arguments would you have presented to the DOJ to persuade it not to challenge the merger? Explainarrow_forwardAs the number of firms in an oligopoly industry decreases, the market moves closer to a __________ market. Over the last 60 or so years, the percentage of women with paid jobs has increased significantly. Is this increase in female employment associated with an increase in the demand for labor, or is it associated with an increase in the supply of labor? How does increased immigration affect the labor market? How would the equilibrium wage and the equilibrium quantity of labor be affected?arrow_forwardCaptain Catahoula and Bow Wow Wonder are two of the four firms in the dog food industry. Before they notify the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice of their plans to merge, Captain Catahoula hires you to determine the concentration of this industry. Use the table to calculate the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) for this dog food industry and then complete the sentence. Firm Industry Bow Wow Wonder 10% Waggin' Tails 34% Mongrel Munchies 16% Captain Catahoula 40% What is the HHI for this dog food industry? HHI: You report that this industry is .arrow_forward
- “Why do industries like electricity or cable TV have just one or two major firms while other industries like restaurants or clothes have hundreds or thousands? What might be a general difference that leads to some industries having many firms while others are dominated by just one or two?”arrow_forwardExplain how organizations can collude to raise prices of products like sugar using the concept of market forces.arrow_forwardAssume the market for a product can be described as a Cournot duopoly with two identical firms. The Nash-equilibrium in this market is that the two firms produce the same quantity. Hence, they will have identical market shares, each will have 50%. Assume that firm 1 decides to invest in a technology that reduces its marginal costs. a) What will happen to the two firms market shares? You must explain how you find the answer. b) What will happen to total production and the price of the product? Again, explain your answer.arrow_forward
- Explain the differences in the nature and source of innovation rents and economic rents earned by firms in a differentiated goods market?arrow_forwardLet's assume that the table below represents the market shares for the smart phone market. Firm Market Share Apple 44% Fujitsu 3% Kyocera 2% LG 3% Motorola 13% Samsung 24% Sanyo 4% Siemens 2% Sony Ericsson 5% Based on this information, the four-firm concentration ratio isarrow_forward1) Explain the significance of the Prisoner's Dilemma, and how the model might be used to explain some forms of competition when there is uncertainty. 2) Explain the similarities and differences between Keynes' theory of consumption and Friedman's Permanent Income Hypothesis. 3) explain why the Marginal Rate of Substitution is equal to the price ratio for all goods, and its significance. 4) Briefly compare and contrast various models of how duopolists compete. 5) Explain whether the Efficient Market Hypothesis is a helpful theory, and why or why not. 6) Explain why financial theory rests on the mean and variance approach to the risk/return relationship. 7) Describe how Fisher and Modigliani helped explain our pattern of savings throughout our lifetime.arrow_forward
- Two firms, A and B, are each considering trying to develop a newwidget. Whichever firm is first to develop the new widget wins a patent worth $20 million plus a penny.Developing a new widget involves several ‘steps’. The firms alternate moves, with A moving first, until oneof them wins the patent. All moves are observed. In each turn, a firm can choose whether to take 0, 1, or2 development ‘steps’. Taking 0 steps in a turn costs that firm $0. Taking 1 step in a turn costs $4 million.And taking 2 steps in a turn costs $11 million. For simplicity, assume a zero discount rate. Initially, eachfirm is 4 steps away from completing development.(a) Describe and explain carefully what will happen in this patent race and why. [Hint: it may help toread Dutta ch 12 (but notice I changed the numbers).](b) Very briefly explain what is the economic rationale for granting ‘intellectual property rights’ such aspatents. What are some disadvantages for society of granting such rights?arrow_forwardUsing the Surplus Approach, describe how tendencies for concentration emerge from the regular functioning of competition between capitalist firms.arrow_forwardAntitrust laws Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. In an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. Consider the following scenario: Suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid SUVs. This illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? The Clayton Act of 1914 The Celler–Kefauver Act of 1950 The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 The Robinson–Patman Act of 1936arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning