a
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event.Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. Theseare only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
b
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event. Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. These are only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
c
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event. Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. These are only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
d.
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event. Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. These are only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 14 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
- For each separate case, state whether the action or situation shows a violation of the AICPACode of Professional Conduct; if so, explain why and cite the relevant rule or interpretation.a. Your client, Contrary Corporation, is very upset over the fact that your audit last yearfailed to detect an $800,000 inventory overstatement caused by employee theft and falsification of the records. The board discussed the matter and authorized its attorneys toexplore the possibility of a lawsuit for damages.b. Contrary Corporation filed a lawsuit alleging negligent audit work, seeking $1 million indamages.c. In response to the lawsuit by Contrary, you decided to bring litigation against certain officers of the company alleging management fraud and deceit. You are asking for a damagejudgment of $500,000.d. The Allright Insurance Company paid Contrary Corporation $700,000 under a fidelitybond covering an inventory theft by employees. Allright is suing your public accountingfirm for damages on the…arrow_forwardSam Jones has been the controller of Downtown Tires for 25 years. Ownership of the firm recently changed hands and the new owners are conducting an audit of the financial records. The audit has been unable to reproduce financial reports that were prepared by Sam. While there is no evidence of wrongdoing, the auditors are concerned that the discrepancies might contribute to poor decisions. Which of the following characteristics of useful information is absent in the situation described above? timelyaccessibleverifiablecompleterelevantarrow_forwardThe board of directors of Danson Company limited asked Jameel & Soften, a Private Auditing Firm to audit Danson’s financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2019. Jameel & Soften explained the need to make an enquiry of the predecessor auditor and requested permission to do so. Danson’s board of directors refused to honor the request on the grounds that relations with the predecessor had deteriorated so significantly that Jameel & Soften would receive biased and defamatory information from the predecessor.Requireda. What is the purpose of the communication between the successor and the predecessor auditor?b. How does communication aid in assessing audit risk?c. What position should Jameel & Soften assume in the present situation? How should they respond to Danson’s refusal to permit communication with the predecessor auditor?arrow_forward
- The board of directors of Danson Company limited asked Jameel & Soften, a Private Auditing Firm to audit Danson’s financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2019. Jameel & Soften explained the need to make an enquiry of the predecessor auditor and requested permission to do so. Danson’s board of directors refused to honor the request on the grounds that relations with the predecessor had deteriorated so significantly that Jameel & Soften would receive biased and defamatory information from the predecessor. Required What is the purpose of the communication between the successor and the predecessor auditor? How does communication aid in assessing audit risk? What position should Jameel & Soften assume in the present situation? How should they respond to Danson’s refusal to permit communication with the predecessor auditor?arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explainarrow_forward
- Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…arrow_forwardAs the auditor for Company A, you discover that a material sale ($500,000 sale; cost of goods of $300,000) was made to a customer this year. Because of poor internal accounting controls, the sale was never recorded. Your client makes a management decision not to bill the customer because such a long time has passed since the shipment was made. You determine, to the best of your ability, that the sale was not fraudulent. Using the framework for ethical decision making, determine whether the auditor should require either a recording or a disclosure of the sales transaction. Instructions: Using the framework for ethical decision making, determine whether the auditor should require either a recording or a disclosure of the sales transaction. Please make sure to use at least 100 words in your response. Once you give your response, please respond to at least two of your peers using at least 50 words in your responses. Remember to follow the netiquette guidelines found in the course…arrow_forwardA CPA is performing review services for a small, closely held manufacturing company.As a part of the follow-up of a significant decrease in the gross margin for the currentyear, the CPA discovers that there are no supporting documents for $40,000 of disbursements. The chief financial officer assures her that the disbursements are proper.What should the CPA do?(1) Include the unsupported disbursements without further work in the statementson the grounds that she is not doing an audit.(2) Modify the review opinion or withdraw from the engagement unless the unsupported disbursements are satisfactorily explained.(3) Exclude the unsupported disbursements from the statements.(4) Obtain a written representation from the chief financial officer that the disbursements are proper and should be included in the current financial statements.arrow_forward
- Assume that after completion of all fieldwork on the audit of Andler Company, but prior to issuance of the audit report, the senior on the engagement informed the engagement partner that he just discovered that his wife has an immaterial investment in Andler Company stock. Which of the following is most accurate as to AICPA Code of Professional Conduct requirements? Multiple Choice The CPA firm must resign the engagement. No action is necessary since he was unaware of his wife’s investment while performing the audit. The CPA firm should evaluate the significance of the breach on the engagement team’s integrity, objectivity and professional skepticism and ability to issue an audit report and then take proper action. The senior’s performance on the audit should be reviewed by the engagement partner to determine that the work performance was acceptable.arrow_forwardAccording to the AICPA Code of Conduct, which of the following acts is generally forbidden to CPAs in public practice?a. Purchasing bookkeeping software from a high-tech development company and resellingit to tax clients.b. Being the author of a “TaxAid” newsletter promoted and sold by a publishing company.c. Having a commission arrangement with an accounting software developer to receive4 percent of the price of programs recommended and sold to audit clients.d. Engaging a marketing firm to obtain new financial planning clients for a fixed fee of$1,000 for each successful contact.arrow_forwardThe senior partner of Wojtysiak & Co., CPAs, has been approached by a small, publicly traded corporation wishing to change auditors. The Wojtysiak firm does not audit any other public companies. Because of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Mike Wojtysiak, the senior partner, needs to know the regulatory issues facing his firm if it accepts the new engagement.RequiredDraft a report that outlines the Sarbanes–Oxley considerations for a firm such as the Wojtysiak firm. Locate the actual act (Public Law 107-204) or perform a thorough summary and review it prior to preparing the report.arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub