a)
Calculation of individual’s human wealth and total wealth.
a)
Explanation of Solution
The percentage discourage value of labor income is known as the individual human wealth. One can calculate individual human wealth as follows:
Based on the calculated value, one can calculate the total wealth as follows.
Thus, the human wealth is $ 109,524 and financial wealth is $159,524.
b)
Neo classical consumer’s consumption today and in future and the saving rate.
b)
Explanation of Solution
One can calculate the wealth used for consumption by a neo classical consumer in today and in future as follows:
The wealth used for consumption by a neo classical consumer will be $79,762 today and $83,750 in the future. Then, the saving rate can be calculated as follows:
c)
Change in today’s saving rate if current labor income increased by $20,000.
c)
Explanation of Solution
The increase of income by $20,000 will raise the total wealth by the same amount. Then, the marginal propensity to consume will become
d)
Change in today consumption if future labor income increased by $10,000.
d)
Explanation of Solution
If there is an increase in the future income, one can calculate the changes in total wealth only based on the present value of the interest rate. Thus, the total wealth will be changed to $9,524. Then, the consumption will be raised by the half of the total wealth. That is, the current consumption will increased by $4762
e)
Change in the total wealth and today consumption if the interest rate rises to 10.
e)
Explanation of Solution
If the interest rate becomes 10 %, one can calculate the new human wealth as follows:
Based on the calculated value, one can calculate the total wealth as follows.
Thus the, human wealth is $ 109,090 and total wealth is $159,090. Then, he will definitely change his consumption accordance with the change in the interest rate. Hence, one can calculate the today consumption as follows:
Here, the consumption changes from $79,762 to $79,545. Thus, the savings will be $20,455 (100,000 – 79,545). The decrease in consumption leads to an increase in the saving by $217 (20,455 – 20,238).
f)
Changes in the consumption if the professor could not borrow today.
f)
Explanation of Solution
According to the problem, initially, the student has a very low income. According to the model of neo classical consumption, she can line up her current consumption better with the future income through a borrowing of higher amount. This will not be possible if she refused to borrow. Suppose she consumes as much as she can consume today, it implies that the she will use up all her resources.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Macroeconomics (Fourth Edition)
- What is a random walk? How is Hall’s random-walk model of consumption related to the life-cycle and permanent-income hypotheses?arrow_forwardIn the Neoclassical model of determination of income in the long run we assumed that aggregate consumption was an increasing function of disposable income, , and nothing else. Suppose that instead we assume that consumption is an increasing function of disposable income, , and a decreasing function of the real interest rate, . Provide an economic rationale for making consumption a function of the real interest rate. How does this assumption change the national saving function relative to the benchmark model Using the model developed in (1), use a diagram for the market for loanable funds to describe what happens to national saving, national investment, and the real interest rate when government expenditure increases. Make sure to also explain in your own words the economic intuition of your results.arrow_forwardFrom the Intertemporal Choice Model, many theories (non-Keynesian theories of Consumption) came into being. Using graphical and mathematical expressions, compare and contrast the following theories on consumption behaviours:i. Franco Modigliani: Life-Cycle Hypothesisii. Milton Friedman: Permanent-Income Hypothesisiii. Robert Hall: Random Walk Hypothesisarrow_forward
- With the theoretical prediction of PIH mind, explain how Friedman sought to reconcile the evidence about consumption from cross-sectional data with that from time-series macroeconomic data.arrow_forwardConsider a closed economy to which the Keynesian-cross analysis applies. Consumption is given by the equation C = 200 + 2/3(Y – T). Planned investment is 300, as are government spending and taxes. What happens to unplanned inventory investment? Should equilibrium Y be higher or lower than 1,500?arrow_forwardThe neoclassical consumption model, a retirement perspective: Consider thespecial case solved in the text where ! = 1 and utility takes the log form.Suppose the real interest rate is 5 percent. Let’s give this consumer a fnancial profle that might look like that of a middle-aged college professor contem-plating retirement: initial assets are ftoday = $50,000, and the path for labor income is ytoday = $100,000 and yfuture = $10,000.(a) What is the individual’s human wealth? Total wealth?arrow_forward
- Carefully explain the major differences between the Keynes and Fisher models of consumptionarrow_forwardIn an economy, if structural unemployment decreases while theother types of unemployment remain unchanged, then (circle theletter representing the right answer below)A) the natural rate of unemployment and potential GDP willremain unchanged.B) the natural rate of unemployment and potential GDP will bothdecrease.C) the natural rate of unemployment will increase and potentialGDP will decrease.D) the natural rate of unemployment will decrease and potentialGDP will increasef) In words, discuss the limitations of the neoclassical analysiswith respect to closing a recessionary gap.arrow_forwardExplain why changes in consumption are unpredictable if consumers obey the permanent-income hypotheses and have rational expectations.arrow_forward
- Using the Neoclassical model of Investment, mathematical equations and graphs, explain the real cost to rental firms of owning capital.arrow_forwardSpecific Subject: Macroeconomics - Basic Neoclassical Model This problem indicated At (exogenous variable represents as Technology as looks at Cobb-Douglas production functions). This problem indicated At (exogenous variable represents Technology as can be seen in various Cobb-Douglas type production functions).Then, the objective is to model 2 graphs considering 2 labour offers - one relatively elastic and the other inelastic -, and to analyse the effects of variables such as Yt (output), rt (interest rate), wt (nominal wage) and Nt (labour) and how they are impacted by these offers and thus explain what happens to the real wage. This problem was sent 2 times, but due to the complexity it was rejected. I urgently need a resolution.arrow_forwardSolve for Y2 in the two-period consumption model with the following given information: Y1 = 1,100 r = 3% C1 = 1,250 C2 = 1,400arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax