Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337093897
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 3BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary: The LLC named C and other investors took part in a project managed by another LLC, Z. The participants came into a new LLC agreement for the project. Investors had issued a complaint on Z for his failure in providing information. Investors filed a case against Z for breaching contract and fiduciary duty. Z went for summary judgement.
To find: The judgement of the court in Z’s case.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Considering the following statements true or false.
1.Circumstances whereby the CFA member breaches client confidentiality are acceptable in circumstances directed by the client in writing.
2.Mosaic theory damages the interest of all investors by disrupting the smooth functioning of forward markets and lowering investor confidence.
3.As a philosophical ethical principle, when analysing actions undertaken, it is acceptable that an act can be seen as good or bad regardless of the underlying/relevant circumstances.
4.As part of Standard IV, as a superior, it is not your responsibility to ensure ethical behaviour of your subordinates.
5.Premium investment services should be designed in such a way that, while beneficial to those who are in a position to take advantage of them, they are not unfairly disadvantages to other classes of clients.
Mikhail and Dana Jackson, doing business as M&D Enterprises, Inc., bought a retail electronics store under a franchise agreement from a national company, Tunes Hut. The Jacksons borrowed from State Bank to pay for the business and signed loan documents and a financing statement, which identified the Jacksons as "Debtors." Elsewhere on the financing statement, the bank identified "M&D Enterprises, Inc., Tunes Hut, Dana K. Jackson, Mikhail C. Jackson" as "Debtors." The statement covered, in part, the store inventory. The bank filed the financing statement with the proper government agency.
Three years later, the store closed. Tunes Hut terminated the franchise and took possession of the inventory, claiming the Jacksons and M&D owed Tunes Hut $6,394.73. State Bank filed a suit in a state court against Tunes Hut, claiming a perfected security interest in the inventory with priority over Tunes Hut's claim. Did the bank's security interest take priority over Tunes Hut’s…
The pre-emptive rights of stockholders in a corporation are not statutory rights, but are ____________ and exist even when no specific grant or recognition of such right is provided for in statutory law.
inherent rights
common law rights
provided by the Corporation Code
implied rights
A share held by a third person to be released only upon the performance of a condition or the happening of a certain event contained in the agreement.
Common share
Preferred share
Escrow share
Treasury share
One of the attributes of a corporation is that it is an artificial being with a separate personality. As a result of this attribute, the corporation:
is not liable for torts committed by its officer or agent.
is liable for torts committed by its officer or agent.
is liable for torts by its stockholders.
is liable for torts committed by its stockholders and officers or agents.
The “Grandfather Rule” in Corporation law means that:
corporate stockholdings would be traced from the nationality of the…
Chapter 17 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Musab who is appointed as liquidator of the company had acted beyond his scope of authority as claimed by third parties. Which one of the following is IRRELEVANT to this situation? Liable to apologize to the third parties Liable to the partners of the company Liable to the Auditors of the company All of the given optionsarrow_forwardParker and Phillips incorporated P & P Resorts Inc., a closely held Texas corporation. Parker was president and Phillips served as vice president and director for operations. Parker owned 40% of the stock, while Phillips owned 60%. Both men met with CTA, a group of travel agents from California to discuss special deals for booking groups into the resorts. After the first meeting, all contracts with CTA were made by Phillips, who learned that there was a good chance that CTA would award the contract to P&P Resorts. Phillips incorporated Travel Brokers and was its sole owner. Phillips used P& P Resort’s time to work on proposals for Travel Brokers and managed to keep negotiations with CTA a secret from Parker. When Parker discovered Phillip’s actions, he filed suit against him for wrongfully taking a corporate opportunity from P &P Resorts. Phillips claimed that he did not take a corporate opportunity because Travel Brokers did not have the financial ability to…arrow_forwardMuller, a shareholder of SCM, brought an action against SCM over his unsuccessful negotiations to purchase some of SCM’s assets overseas. He then formed a shareholder committee to challenge the position of SCM’s management in that suit. To conduct a proxy battle for management control at the next election of directors, the committee sought to obtain the list of shareholders who would be eligible to vote. At the time, however, no member of the committee had owned stock in SCM for the six-month period required to gain access to such information. Then Lopez, a former SCM executive and a shareholder for more than one year, joined the committee and demanded to be allowed to inspect the minutes of SCM shareholder proceedings and to gain access to the current shareholder list. His stated reason for making the demand was to solicit proxies in support of those the committee had nominated for positions as directors. Lopez brought this action after SCM rejected this demand. Will Lopez succeed?arrow_forward
- The McDonald Investment Company was a corporation organized and incorporated in the state of Minnesota. The principal and only place of business from which the company conducted operations was Rush City, Minnesota. More than 80 percent of the company’s assets were located in Minnesota, and more than 80 percent of its income was derived from Minnesota. McDonald sold securities to Minnesota residents only. The proceeds from the sale were used entirely to make loans and other investments in real estate and other assets located outside the state of Minnesota. The company did not file a registration statement with the SEC. Does this offering qualify for an intrastate offering exemption from registration? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardA proxy is a representative of a (shareholder, officer, director) who is liable to (vote, sell shares, buy shares) on the shareholder's behalf at a shareholder meeting. Proxy agreements are generally valid for (eleven months, twelve months, thirteen months). At the time of the shareholder meeting, Francescas's proxy agreement was (fourteen months, thirteen months, twelve months) old. Therefore, Francesca's proxy agreement with her representative (expired, did not expire), and her representative (may not, may) vote on Franscesca's behalf. What if the Facts were Different Assume that Brenda purchased Mike's 100 shares of stock and Fransesca signed a new proxy agreement on May 15, 2020. Brenda's purchase of stock on May 15, 2020, is (after, before) the record date. On the record date, (Mike, Brenda) is the owner of the 100 shares and (may not, may) vote based on ownership of the 100 shares at the shareholder meeting. If Francesca signed a proxy agreement on May 15, 2020, it is (more…arrow_forwardMerrill Lynch employed Post and Maney as account executives. Both men elected to be paid a salary and to participate in the firm’s pension and profit-sharing plans rather than take a straight commission. Thirteen years later, Merrill Lynch terminated the employment of both Post and Maney. Both men began working for a competitor of Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch then informed them that all of their rights in the companyfunded pension plan had been forfeited pursuant to a provision of the plan that permitted forfeiture in the event an employee directly or indirectly competed with the firm. Is Merrill Lynch correct in its assertion? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- The shareholders of Escalante company are suing the external auditors of the company. The shareholders are upset because the management of Escalante company produced overly positive financial statements and used these financial statements to lure new investors. Escalante company is now bankrupt, the managers are facing prison time, and the external auditors are in monetary damages settlement talks with shareholders of Escalante company. What role could the public company accounting oversight board (PCAOB) have played in avoiding this catastrophe?arrow_forwardAt the end of 2001, Lehnhoff Inc. had $75 million in cash on its balance sheet. During 2002, the following eventsoccurred. The cash flow from Lehnhoff’s operating activities totaled $325 million. Lehnhoff issued $500 million incommon stock. Lehnhoff’s notes payable decreased by $100 million. Lehnhoff purchased fixed assets totaling $600million. How much cash did Lehnhoff Inc. have on its balance sheet at the end of 2002?arrow_forwardOlav starts Power Cells to make and sell batteries. Later, Olav contracts with Quinn to invest additional capital in the firm in exchange for 25 percent of the profits. Olav and Quinn are not partners in Power Cells becausearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education