PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS...(LL)
23rd Edition
ISBN: 9781260433197
Author: Jones
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 18, Problem 13AP
A revenue agent determined that Ms. Owen underpaid her income tax by $48,100 and concluded that $9,200 was caused by her inadequate record keeping while the remainder was caused by her understandable misapplication of a complex rule of law. Compute the negligence penalty that the revenue agent can impose on Ms. Owen.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Mr. Cruz was an employee of ABC Trading. He was killed by a co-
employee in one of their regular “inuman" session. A case was filed by the
heirs of Mr. Cruz against the co-employee. The court decided in favor of
the heirs and awarded them the following:
Description
Amount
Compensatory damages
Moral damages
Exemplary damages
For attorney's fees and cost of lawsuit
Consequential damages representing the loss of the
victim's earning capacity
P400,000
800,000
200,000
500,000
1,300,000
How much of the above is return of capital?
P3,200,000
O P2,400,000
P2,200,000
P1,900,000
If Bob takes an improper deduction for
$10,000 by mistake because he
misunderstood the tax law, and Jane
knowingly takes a $10,000 improper
deduction because she thinks the IRS will not
catch it, then should the two taxpayers be
treated differently?
If your answer is yes that Bob should not be
viewed as a tax evader, then what is stopping
Jane from asserting ignorance if she is
caught?
Ashley received a civil judgement against Sales Associate Betsy. The judge awarded Ashley $10,000 in compensatory damages and $8,000 in punitive damages. Court costs amounted to $3,000. Because Betsy had insufficient assets to satisfy the judgment, Ashley made a claim to the Recovery Fund, which was accepted. What is the maximum amount that the Recovery Fund reimburse Ashley?
Chapter 18 Solutions
PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS...(LL)
Ch. 18 - Prob. 1QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 2QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 3QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 4QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 5QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 6QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 7QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 8QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 9QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 10QPD
Ch. 18 - Prob. 11QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 12QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 13QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 14QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 1APCh. 18 - Prob. 2APCh. 18 - Prob. 3APCh. 18 - Prob. 4APCh. 18 - Prob. 5APCh. 18 - Prob. 6APCh. 18 - Prob. 7APCh. 18 - Prob. 8APCh. 18 - Prob. 9APCh. 18 - Prob. 10APCh. 18 - Prob. 11APCh. 18 - Prob. 12APCh. 18 - A revenue agent determined that Ms. Owen underpaid...Ch. 18 - Prob. 14APCh. 18 - Prob. 15APCh. 18 - Prob. 16APCh. 18 - Prob. 17APCh. 18 - Prob. 18APCh. 18 - Prob. 19APCh. 18 - Prob. 20APCh. 18 - Prob. 22APCh. 18 - Prob. 8IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 9IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 1RPCh. 18 - Prob. 2RPCh. 18 - Prob. 1TPCCh. 18 - Prob. 2TPC
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Kyle provides landscaping services to a number of clients. In filing his current-year income tax return, Kyle excluded revenue received from cash customers. If Kyle is found guilty of fraud, he may be subject to all of the following except: a. Other penalties as provided by law. b. A fine for not more than $250,000. c. Being held responsible for the costs of prosecution. d. Imprisonment for not more than 2 yearsarrow_forwardCraig commits fraud on his tax return. It is found that he was $40,000 deficient in his tax because of the fraud. What would his penalty be? Please show all calculations to demonstrate how you arrived at your answer. In your response, please make sure to take all of the facts above into consideration. You can refer back to the text, lecture videos, and the IRS website.arrow_forwardJuan inquired from the BIR whether or not he will be covered with the new tax law. The BIR issued an administrative ruling that his activities are not covered by the new tax law. As a result, Juan did not pay his tax for several years based on the said BIR ruling. Currently, the BIR Commissioner found out that the previous ruling was erroneous and reversed the same with a new BIR ruling. The BIR then issued tax assessment against Juan for purposes of collecting back taxes.Is the tax assessment against Juan correct? A. Yes, because the previous BIR ruling was corrected and the activities of Juan should have been taxable. B. Yes, because the ruling of the BIR Commissioner must be final. C. No, Juan should be exempted from paying taxes under the old and new law. D. No, because reversal of BIR ruling shall not be retroactive in application especially if the ruling is prejudicial to the taxpayerarrow_forward
- T embezzles $100,000 from his employer in Year 1. The embezzlement isdiscovered during the course of an audit in Year 2, at which time T repays the money infull.a. T realizes $100,000 of income in Year 1.b. T doesn’t realize any income in Year 1 because he had a legal obligation torepay the money at the time he took it.c. T realizes $100,000 of income when the embezzlement is discovered in Year 2,but only if he doesn’t repay it in that year.d. None of the above. While shopping at a flea market in Year 1, T bought a simple jewelry box for $20.When T got home with her new purchase, she discovered that the box had a hiddencompartment which contained an emerald ring. She then immediately had the ringappraised by an expert on emerald jewelry and learned that it was worth $5,000. T soldthe ring to her mother for $4,000 in Year 2.a. There are virtually no cases dealing with the recognition of income for noncashor non-bullion “treasure trove.”b. T would be required to recognize $4,980 of…arrow_forwardAn accident solely attributable to the criminal negligence of the driver of Reckless Bus Company resulted in the death of Ricardo's wife, physical injury to Ricardo that prevented him from working for a month and the total wreck of his brand new car which he bought for P400,000. In the action for damages filed by Ricardo against the Bus Company, the Court awarded the following: For Ricardo's injury consisting mainly in the loss of his right arm P30,000 For the loss of one month salary 25,000 For the death of his wife 25,000 For moral damages on account of such loss 100,000 For the loss of his car the value of which doubled because of inflation 800,000 1. How much was the taxable income of Ricardo?"arrow_forwardThompson’s house was destroyed by fire and claims were filed with the insurance company. The insurance company (insurer) hired Cannon to investigate the fire as it was suspicious about the cause. Subsequently, the insurer denied the claims based on Cannon’s report. Thompson sued the insurer and Cannon. Thompson claimed to be a third party beneficiary of the Cannon-insurer contract. Is Thompson correct? If not, what type of beneficiary is he and why? arrow_forward
- For tax year 2019, the IRS assesses a deficiency against David for $500,000. a. Disregarding the interest component, enter David's penalty if the deficiency is attributable to negligence: $fill in the blank 25590105cfe4f81_1. b. Disregarding the interest component, enter David's penalty if the deficiency is attributable to civil fraud: $fill in the blank e5c80bf76f8702a_1.arrow_forwardVaughn Manufacturing is being sued for illness caused to local residents as a result of negligence on the company's part in permitting the local residents to be exposed to highly toxic chemicals from its plant. Vaughn's lawyer states that it is probable that Vaughn will lose the suit and be found liable for a judgment costing Vaughn anywhere from $1820000 to $8970000. However, the lawyer states that the most probable cost is $5370000. As a result of the above facts, Vaughn should accrue O a loss contingency of $5370000 but not disclose any additional contingency. O a loss contingency of $1820000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $7150000. O no loss contingency but disclose a contingency of $1820000 to $8970000. O a loss contingency of $5370000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $3600000.arrow_forwardMurray reported to the Environmental Protection Agency that his employer was illegally dumping chemicals into a river. His charges were true, and Murray's employer was fined. In retaliation, Murray's employer fired him and made deliberate efforts to prevent Murray from obtaining other employment. Murray sued the employer, claiming that his reputation had been damaged. Murray won his lawsuit and received an award for "damages to his personal and professional reputa- tion and for his mental suffering." Now he would like to know whether the award is taxable. He argues that he was awarded damages as a recovery of his human capital and that a recovery of capital is not income. Is Murray's logic comrect?arrow_forward
- Marcus issues a negotiable promissory note payable to the order of Parish for the amount of $3,000. Parish raises the amount to $13,000 and negotiates it to Hilda for $12,000. a. If Hilda is a holder in due course, how much can she recover from Marcus? How much from Parish? If Marcus’s negligence substantially contributed to the making of the alteration, how much can Hilda recover from Marcus and Parish, respectively? b. If Hilda is not a holder in due course, how much can she recover from Marcus? How much from Parish? If Marcus’s negligence substantially contributed to the making of the alteration, how much can Hilda recover from Marcus and Parish, respectively?arrow_forwardThe negligence of Dave, driver of a certain bus company, resulted in the death of Pedro's wife, physical injuries to Pedro that prevented him from working for a month, and the total wreck of Pedro's brand new car which he had bought for P400,000. In the action for damages filed by Pedro against the bus company, the court awarded the following: • P30,000 for Pedro's injuries consisting mainly in the loss of his right hand; • P45,000 for Pedro's loss of one month salary: P25,000 for the death of his wife; P100,000 moral damages on account of the death of Pedro's wife; and P800,000 for the loss of Pedro's car. How much is excluded from gross income?arrow_forwardThe negligence of Aivee, driver of a certain bus company, resulted in the death of JP's wife, physical injuries to JP that prevented him from working for a month, and the total wreck of JP's brand new car which he had bought for P400.000. In the action for damages filed by JP against the bus company, the court awarded the following: • P30,000 for JP's injuries consisting mainly in the loss of his right hand; • P45,000 for JP's loss of one month salary: • P25,000 for the death of his wife: • P100,000 moral damages on account of the death of JP's wife; and • P800,000 for the loss of JP's car. How much is excluded from gross income? a Zero b. P155,000 c. P555,000 d. P955,000arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:9780357109731
Author:Hoffman
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
How to Calculate your Income Tax? Step-by-Step Guide for Income Tax Calculation; Author: ETMONEY;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdJKpSXCYmQ;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
How to Calculate Federal Income Tax; Author: Edspira;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LrvRqOEYk8;License: Standard Youtube License