The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781305764460
Author: Frank B Cross/ Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: CENGAGE C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 2BS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Person W is the owner of company WC and is also a board of directors of the company WC. Company OC is negotiating with company WC for renovation of the headquarters. W previously disclosed about his personal interest in incorporating the construction company to two of the other directors. The company approves of the contract by three-to-two votes with W voting with majority.
To find: The extent to which the contract is binding on the corporation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Oxy Corp. is negotiating with Wick Construction Co. for the renovation of Oxy’s corporate headquarters. Wick, the owner of Wick Construction Co., is also one of the five members of Oxy’s board of directors. The contract terms are standard for this type of contract. Wick has previously informed two of the other directors of his interest in the construction company. Oxy’s board approves the contract by a three-to-two vote, with Wick voting with the majority.
Question: Should the contract between Oxy Corp and Wick Construction corp. be set aside or is it binding? What would have been the proper way for Wick to conduct himself at the Oxy board meeting?
Clay and Roan are negotiating the sale of Clay's car to Roan. Roan tells Clay he needs a little time to consider the last
offer Clay made. A week later, Roan emails Clay, "I accept your offer." Clay and Roan
a. have a valid contract because Clay did not specify the method of acceptance and accepting via email a
week later is reasonable.
b. do not have a valid contract because accepting a week later is an unreasonable lapse of time.
c. do not have a valid contract because accepting via email is an unreasonable manner of acceptance.
d. have a valid contract because they were in the middle of negotiations.
Palatka Costumes & Caps LLC ("PC & C") is a large props company formed in 1957, and Frodo Flags
Corporation is a small, local flag manufacturer formed in 2015. These two businesses never had any
dealings with each other until they recently entered into a contract, with terms all drafted by PC & C.
The contract provides that PC & C shall purchase 1,000 flags that Frodo Flags will specially design
for PC & C. The contract further provides that PC & C has the right to initiate, on a weekly basis,
purchase orders of up to 100 flags until the contract's total number of flag purchases - 1,000 flags
has been met. Also, the contract includes a clause stating that PC & C can cancel its obligation to
pay for the remaining flags at any time if any Frodo Flags shipment does not arrive on the exact day
as stated in a particular purchase order; this last provision is included in the contract even though
time was of little importance to PC & C.
W
The first shipment of 100 flags arrives a day late,…
Chapter 18 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Cari enters a single-agency relationship with a listing broker, who owes her full disclosure and loyalty. The listing broker then finds Buyer Bonnie who wants that same broker to represent her in a transaction broker relationship, providing Bonnie with certain duties such as limited confidentiality. Can the broker represent Cari in a single-agency relationship AND represent Bonnie as a transaction broker in the same transaction? No, because offering Bonnie limited confidentiality would conflict with the full disclosure already owed to Cari. Yes, but only if the limited confidentiality owed to Bonnie is needed to fulfill Cari's objective of selling the property. Yes, as long as the broker tries to be fair to br + parties.arrow_forwardBased on your knowledge of contracts from your reading this week, discuss the following case. Be sure to support your view with the facts and the law.Maurice is an accountant who works for the firm of Addum, Upp, &Paymee. Maurice was approached by Shirley Eugest, who represents one of Addum’s competitors, BeanCounters, Inc. Maurice was offered a substantial raise to leave his company and work for BeanCounters. When Maurice’s boss heard this he called him in and said, “If you stay with us, I promise that next year you will receive a promotion with a 50% raise, and a 5-year contract.†Maurice turned down the offer from BeanCounters and stayed with Addum. Nine months later Maurice was dismissed due to corporate downsizing. Can Maurice legally enforce his boss’s promise? What theory or theories would Maurice use? Discuss fully.Topic 22. Read the scenario set out below and discuss the questions that follow it:Art…arrow_forwardAssume that Elkins contracted to build an addition to Cromwell’s plant producing cruise missiles just prior to the Gulf War. The war ended before Elkins started work, and Cromwell tried to cancel the contract. Can Elkins do anything about the loss of his anticipated profit (a) if the contract contained a proper cancellation clause? (b) if the contract contained no clause dealing with cancellation?arrow_forward
- Business contracts may contain exclusion clauses as a means of limiting or excluding liabilities. Explain what is meant by the term “exclusion clause” and how case law and statutes regulate the use of such clauses in business contracts.arrow_forwardDavid is a licensed agent who typically represents homeowners looking to sell their house. As an agent, David has limited authority when working with clients, and his duties are limited to those outlined in the listing agreement. How would you characterize David's agency relationship? O David is a special agent since he is only responsible for one property at a time with limited duties. O David is a universal agent because he signed a listing agreement with the seller. О David is a general agent because he works with more than one client at a time. O David is a dual agent because he works with more than one seller at a time.arrow_forwardMai enters into an agreement to sell an antique bedroom set to Alice for $200,000 because it is exquisite and unique. Madison offers to pay Mai $250,000 for the furniture. Mai calls Alice to cancel the contract. Is this a type of contract where usually contains a liquidated damages clause? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- All but which of the following must be present in order for a contract may be voided based upon mutual mistake? Multiple Choice 1. The mistake must result in a material effect on the contract. 2. a basic assumption about the subject matter of the contract is present. (Incorrect answer) 3. An adverse effect on a party who did not agree to bear the risk of mistake at the time of the agreement occurred. 4. Both of the parties were negligent in their representations to the other party.arrow_forwardWhich of the following represents an agency relationship? 1) Horace wants to sell his farm and hires Marcie as his realtor. The two agree that if Marcie finds a buyer for the farm at Horace's price, then Horace will pay Marcie 7% of the price he receives. 2) Bob dies and leaves his assets in a trust for his minor child, Lilly. In the trust, Bob appoints Reggie as the trustee to act for Lilly's benefit. Since Reggie has a fiduciary duty to Lilly as trustee, Reggie is Lilly's agent. 3) Lucy contracts to sell her car to Tony for $5,000. Tony purchases the car only to find it not in the condition that Lucy described it. Tony is claiming that Lucy violated her fiduciary duty to him as his agent under the agreement. 4) Hunt is an attorney of questionable ethics. Roger, one of Hunt's clients, is arrested for DUI, but appears to be too intoxicated to consent to a breath test. Hunt is contacted by…arrow_forwardDorian breeds Scottish Fold kittens and informs Stevie that she is a cat breeder. Stevie says she is interested in purchasing one of her kittens. Dorian calls Stevie a month later and says Stevie's kitten is ready for pickup and Stevie owes her $1,000. Stevie refuses, stating they did not have a valid contract. Dorian states they did have a valid contract. Who is correct? a. Stevie. The terms of the offer were not definite. b. Stevie. The fee for the kitten is outrageously expensive for a kitten. c. Dorian. Stevie said she was interested in purchasing one of her kittens. d. Dorian. Dorian relied on Stevie's interest and reasonably believed Stevie would purchase one of her kittens.arrow_forward
- Dimitri lends his brother, Calvin, $1,800. Calvin and Willa agree that Calvin will build a new pool deck for Willa in exchange for Willa paying Dimitri $1,800. Calvin builds the pool deck, but Willa refuses to pay Dimitri any money. Can Dimitri sue for payment? O No, because Dimitri was not a party to the contract. O No. because Dimitri did not build the pool deck. O Yes, because Dimitri is a donee beneficiary. O No, because Dimitri is an incidental beneficiary. Yes, because Dimitri is a creditor beneficiary.arrow_forward(c)Ghaffar purchased a piece of land from Sharif who is an engineer by profession. During the discussion prior to the purchase, Sharif had told Ghaffar that in his opinion, the land would be able to support 2,500 mango trees. However, only 2, 300 trees could eventually be planted on the land. Under the provisions of the Contract Act 1872, discuss whether Ghaffar can claim damages on the grounds of fraud. (4)arrow_forwardWhat happens when homeowners owe more to subcontractors than the total price they were to pay the general contractor because the general contractor has not paid the subcontractors and the general contractor is no longer solvent? a. Courts and states have differing standards of equity applied in resolving these issues b. The homeowners cannot be liened by the subcontractors c. Homeowners are always exempt from paying more than they owed the general contractor d. The homeowners must pay the full amount due to all subcontractorsarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education