Loose Leaf for Principles of Taxation for Business and Investment Planning 2019 Edition
22nd Edition
ISBN: 9781260161472
Author: Sally Jones, Shelley C. Rhoades-Catanach
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 2TPC
To determine
Analyze the litigation strategy of CMP Corporation in selecting a trial court.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Which of the following is wrong?
Exempt corporations are subject to income tax on their income from unrelated activities.
Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations are subject to regular corporate income tax.
Exempt corporations who filed late are not subject to penalties because they have no tax due.
None of the above.
Indicate whether the following statements are "True" or "False" regarding the administrative powers of the IRS.
a.
If the taxpayer meets the record-keeping requirement and substantiates income and deductions properly, the IRS bears the burden of proof in establishing a tax deficiency during litigation.
b.
The Code permits the IRS to assess a deficiency and to demand payment for the tax. However, no assessment or effort to collect the tax may be made until 30 days after a statutory notice of a deficiency (a 30-day letter) is issued.
c.
If the taxpayer neglects or refuses to pay the tax after receiving the demand for payment, a lien in favor of the IRS is placed on all property (realty and personalty, tangible and intangible) belonging to the taxpayer.
During the audit conducted by the BIR official, it was found that the rental income claimed by the corporation was not subjected to expanded withholding tax. Accordingly, the claimed rental expense: *
Is deductible from the gross income of the corporation, despite non-withholding of income taxby the corporation
Is deductible, if it can be shown that the lessor has correctly reported the rental income in his tax return.
Is not deductible from gross income of the corporation due to non-withholding of tax;
Is deductible from the gross income of the corporation, provided that the 5% expanded withholding tax is paid by the corporation during the audit;
Chapter 18 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Principles of Taxation for Business and Investment Planning 2019 Edition
Ch. 18 - Prob. 1QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 2QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 3QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 4QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 5QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 6QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 7QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 8QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 9QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 10QPD
Ch. 18 - Prob. 11QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 12QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 13QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 14QPDCh. 18 - Prob. 1APCh. 18 - Prob. 2APCh. 18 - Prob. 3APCh. 18 - Prob. 4APCh. 18 - Prob. 5APCh. 18 - Prob. 6APCh. 18 - Prob. 7APCh. 18 - Prob. 8APCh. 18 - Prob. 9APCh. 18 - Prob. 10APCh. 18 - Prob. 11APCh. 18 - Prob. 12APCh. 18 - A revenue agent determined that Ms. Owen underpaid...Ch. 18 - Prob. 14APCh. 18 - Prob. 15APCh. 18 - Prob. 16APCh. 18 - Prob. 17APCh. 18 - Prob. 18APCh. 18 - Prob. 19APCh. 18 - Prob. 20APCh. 18 - Prob. 21APCh. 18 - Prob. 2IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 3IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 4IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 5IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 6IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 7IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 8IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 9IRPCh. 18 - Prob. 1RPCh. 18 - Prob. 2RPCh. 18 - Prob. 1TPCCh. 18 - Prob. 2TPC
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- If a U.S. Tax Court agrees with the taxpayer on appeal that the IRS position was largely unjustified, which of the following is correct? The taxpayer must still pay administrative and litigation costs. The taxpayer may recover administrative but not litigation costs. The taxpayer may recover litigation but not administrative costs. To be eligible to recover some of the administrative and litigation costs, the taxpayer must have tried to resolve the case administratively, including going through the appeals process, and must have given the IRS the information necessary to resolve the case. None of the above.arrow_forwardSarah Keene, CPA, is the newly hired controller for Plexicon, Inc., which is a publicly traded corporation. Ms. Keene's first job with Plexicon was the review of the company's accounting practices on deferred income taxes. In doing her review, she noted differences between tax and book depreciation methods that permitted Plexicon to realize a sizable deferred tax liability on its balance sheet. As a result, Plexicon paid very little in income taxes at that time.\\n\\n Keene also discovered that Plexicon has an explicit policy of selling off plant assets before they reversed in the deferred tax liability account. This policy, coupled with the rapid expansion of its plant asset base, allowed Plexicon to "defer" all income taxes payable for several years, even though it always has reported positive earnings and an increasing EPS. Keene checked with the legal department and found the policy to be legal, but she's uncomfortable with the ethics of it.\\n\\nRequired:\\n\\nWhy would Plexicon…arrow_forwardWhich ONE of the following statements is true regarding the Canada Revenue Agency's (CRA's) right to reassess an income tax return? (a) A tax return may be reassessed at any time if the taxpayer made any misrepresentation that is attributable to carelessness. (b) A tax return for an individual may be reassessed within four years of the date on which the original assessment was mailed.arrow_forward
- The revenue agent who audited Ms. Hsui's Form 1040 discovered a $15,250 deduction that wasn't allowed by the tax law. The improper deduction reduced Ms. Hsui's tax by $5,033. The total tax deficiency for the year under audit was $6,490. Required: a. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing the tax return. b. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction represented Ms. Hsui's deliberate attempt to cheat the government by underpaying tax. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing the tax return. Note: Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.arrow_forwardMontcalm corp. has total deferred tax assets of $3,000,000 at year-end. Of that amount, $1,000,000 results from the current expensing of an expenditure that the IRS might assert must be capitalized on audit. Management is trying to determine if it should not recognize the deferred tax asset related to this item under ASC 740. What confidence level must management have that the item will be sustained on audit before it can recognize any portion of the deferred tax asset under ASC 740? Probable More likely than not Realistic possibility Reasonable More than remotearrow_forwardThe revenue agent who audited Ms. Hsui's Form 1040 discovered a $15,500 deduction that wasn't allowed by the tax law. The improper deduction reduced Ms. Hsui's tax by $5,053. The total tax deficiency for the year under audit was $6,510. Required: a. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing the tax return. b. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction represented Ms. Hsui's deliberate attempt to cheat the government by underpaying tax. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing the tax return. Note: Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount. Negligence penalty s 291 Ⓡ Required A Required B >arrow_forward
- The following reasons may be given by a taxpayer in refusing to pay his tax liability. Which is not acceptable for legally refusing to pay the tax? o That he will derived no benefit from the tax. o That he has been deprived of due process of law o That the prescription period for the collection of tax has lapsed. o That there is lack of territorial jurisdiction (And please explain the reason why, thank you)arrow_forwardA tax return client was audited for a prior year return and assessed a tax deficiency because a material deduction was disallowed. Nevertheless, the client insists on taking the very same kind of deduction on this year’s return... (a) A CPA absolutely may not prepare or sign the client’s return for this year un-less it conforms to the audit result for the prior year. (b) A CPA may prepare and sign the client’s return for this year claiming a de-duction that previously was disallowed if the CPA determines as a matter of in-dependent professional judgment that the deduction is proper. (c) A CPA may prepare and sign the client’s return for this year claiming a de-duction that previously was disallowed if the CPA receives a formal tax opinion from a law firm or from an unaffiliated CPA affirming that it is more likely than not that the deduction would be sustained on its merits if litigated.arrow_forwardSection 280E is a federal statute that bars any business, or portion of its business, engaged in trafficking a Schedule I or II controlled substance (such as cannabis) from deducting non-COGS related deductions or credits for federal tax purposes. List 3 things about the application of this statute to see if this has any affect on the tax reporting of companies in states that have legalized the cannabis industry.arrow_forward
- 4. The Bureau of Internal Revenue filed a case against Prorealty Corporation due to non-compliance with the said agency and delinquent tax payer. What could be the possible action of the Corporation? Discuss and relate it to the Political Risk.arrow_forwardA company’s new outside CPA determines that the company underpaid its income taxes due to an omission on last year’s tax return, which was prepared by the prior accountant. According to the Statement on Standards for Tax Services, the CPA preparing this year’s tax return: Must report immediately to the IRS. Must advise the client of the omission and recommend appropriate action. Should refuse to sign the current tax return. Is not expected to address issues that relate to previous tax returns.arrow_forwardArthur Young & Co., a firm of certified public accountants, was the independent auditor for Amerada Hess Corporation. During its review of Amerada’s financial statements as required by Federal securities laws, Young confirmed Amerada’s statement of its contingent tax liabilities and prepared tax accrual work papers. These work papers, which pertained to Young’s evaluation of Amerada’s reserves for contingent tax liabilities, included discussions of questionable positions Amerada might have taken on its tax returns. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) initiated a criminal investigation of Amerada’s tax returns when, during a routine audit, it discovered questionable payments made by Amerada from a “special disbursement account.” The IRS summoned Young to make available all its information relating to Amerada, including the tax accrual work papers. Amerada instructed Young not to obey the summons. The IRS then brought an action against Young to enforce the administrative summons.a.…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:9780357109731
Author:Hoffman
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT