Bundle: Macroeconomics, 13th + Aplia, 1 Term Printed Access Card
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781337742375
Author: Roger A. Arnold
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 19, Problem 1WNG
To determine
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider the race for governor of a small state. The population of the state is evenly divided between three cities-Riverville, Hanover, and Danbury.
The governor's race is between Ron Ruskin (the mayor of Riverville) and Ted Topple (the mayor of Hanover). Assume that no matter what is said
during the campaign, Ruskin can count on the support of 100% of the Riverville population, and Topple can count on the support of 100% of the
Hanover population. Assume 100% voter participation.
According to the result of majority-rule voting, the next governor will be the one preferred by the majority of the residents of
The two candidates are asked in a debate about their support of recreational subsidies. Public opinion polls in the city you just identified have shown
the following about the level of recreational subsidies desired:
• 70% want a low level
20% want a medium level
• 10% want a high level
Assuming that voters prefer outcomes closer to their preferred choices to outcomes further away,…
Match the following according to the criterion.
If a candidate receives
[ Choose ]
more than half the first-
place votes in an
election, then that
candidate should be
declared the winner.
If a candidate is favored
[ Choose ]
when compared
separately with every
other candidate in an
election, then that
candidate should be
declared the winner.
If a candidate wins an
[ Choose]
election and, in a
reelection, the only
changes are changes
that favor the
candidate, then that
candidate should win
the reelection.
If a candidate wins an
[ Choose ]
election and, in a
recount, the only
changes are that one or
more of the other
candidates are removed
from the ballot, then
that candidate should
still win the election.
Consider two political candidates A and B facing an electorate with ideological
positions uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. (To remind you, uniformly distributed
means there are equal numbers of voters in the interval between 0.4 and 0.6 as between
0.8 and 1.0 and any interval of the same length.) Candidates want to maximize their vote
shares. Each simultaneously and independently of the other announces a position between
O and 1. A voter chooses to vote for a candidate who is closest to her but will abstain rather
than vote for a candidate whose announced position is more than 0.20 distance away.
Is there a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies? Explain your answer.
Chapter 19 Solutions
Bundle: Macroeconomics, 13th + Aplia, 1 Term Printed Access Card
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Germany and the US are both presidential systems. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forwardExercise 1.12. Consider the following game. There is a club with three members: Ann, Bob and Carla. They have to choose which of the three is going to be president next year. Currently Ann is the president. Each member is both a candidate and a voter. Voting is as follows: each member votes for one candidate (voting for oneself is allowed); if two or more people vote for the same candidate then that person is chosen as the next president; if there is complete disagreement, in the sense that there is exactly one vote for each candidate, then the person from whom Ann voted is selected as the next president. (a) Represent this voting procedure as a game frame, indicating inside each cell of each table which candidate is elected. (b) Assume that the players' preferences are as follows: AnnAm Carla Ann Bob, Carla Bob Ann, Bob Carla Ann Caria Carla. Using utility values 0, 1 and 2, convert the game frame into a game. (c) Apply the IDWDS to the game of part (b). Is there a weak iterated…arrow_forwardhelp me wiith abc please. please be detailed please. thank youarrow_forward
- - = 1.8. Consider a population of voters uniformly distributed along the ideological spectrum from left (x = 0) to right (x = 1). Each of the candidates for a single office simultaneously chooses a cam- paign platform (i.e., a point on the line between x 0 and x 1). The voters observe the candidates' choices, and then each voter votes for the candidate whose platform is closest to the voter's position on the spectrum. If there are two candidates and they choose platforms x₁ = .3 and x2 = .6, for example, then all voters to the left of x .45 vote for candidate 1, all those to the right vote for candidate 2, and candidate 2 wins the elec- tion with 55 percent of the vote. Suppose that the candidates care only about being elected—they do not really care about their platforms at all! If there are two candidates, what is the pure- strategy Nash equilibrium? If there are three candidates, exhibit a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium. (Assume that any candidates who choose the same platform…arrow_forwardExplanation with answerarrow_forwardWhat has been the impact of the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Group of answer choices Corporations and political action committees were forbidden from donating to elections. Election spending was ruled unconstitutional. Election spending has increased because it allowed unlimited contributions from companies and political action committees. Election spending has decreased as stricter spending limits were put in place.arrow_forward
- please help me answer this question. 0.162 is incorrectarrow_forwardNonearrow_forwardIn which of the following systems does the indirectly elected prime minister serve for an unfixed term and may be removed by a vote of no confidence? Group of answer choices Parliamentary systems Semi-presidential systems Presidential systemsarrow_forward
- New answer neededarrow_forwardPlease solve these multiple questions. These are very important to me... THANK YOU!!!arrow_forwardHow does a "progressive tax system" differ from a "regressive tax system" in terms of income distribution? A) A progressive tax system imposes higher tax rates on higher incomes, while a regressive tax system imposes higher tax rates on lower incomes. B) A progressive tax system imposes a uniform tax rate on all incomes, while a regressive tax system adjusts rates based on economic cycles. C) A progressive tax system reduces income inequality by taxing higher incomes at higher rates, while a regressive tax system can increase inequality by placing a heavier burden on lower incomes. D) A progressive tax system exempts lower incomes from taxation, while a regressive tax system taxes all incomes at the same rate.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning