EBK ECONOMICS
13th Edition
ISBN: 8220106799642
Author: PARKIN
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 17APA
To determine
Draw the MC and MB
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Imagine that a town of 200 people is trying to decide whether to pay for mosquito control. The town has surveyed their citizens
and they each say they value mosquito control at $75. Mosquito control only costs $2,500 so the town goes ahead and pays for the
service. When the town asks for donations to pay for the mosquito control, they only receive $1,000. What does this result show?
Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer.
a
The town's citizens were free riders.
b
The mosquito control suffered from the tragedy of commons.
The mosquito control cost must have been greater than its economic benefit.
d.
The town's survey must have overestimated the value of mosquito control.
Draw a graph with pollution abatement on the horizontal axis (assume a firm can remove up to 100 tons
of pollution) and dollars ($) on the vertical axis. Draw one firm's marginal abatement cost curve (MC).
Say a pollution tax is imposed on the firm. a. What are the costs the firm would incur if they chose to not
reduce pollution at all? b. Is there a different level of pollution abatement the firm could choose that
would result in lower costs? c. Label that level of abatement A* on your graph and shade in the area that
represents the cost-savings as compared to when they polluted 100 tons (did no abatement)
Suppose you are part of an economic analysis team charged with recommending a policy response to pesticide risks. Explain the steps your team should take and why.
Chapter 2 Solutions
EBK ECONOMICS
Ch. 2.1 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2.1 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2.1 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2.1 - Prob. 4RQCh. 2.1 - Prob. 5RQCh. 2.1 - Prob. 6RQCh. 2.2 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2.2 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2.2 - Prob. 4RQ
Ch. 2.2 - Prob. 5RQCh. 2.3 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2.3 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2.3 - Prob. 4RQCh. 2.3 - Prob. 5RQCh. 2.3 - Prob. 6RQCh. 2.3 - Prob. 7RQCh. 2.4 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2.4 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2.4 - Prob. 4RQCh. 2.4 - Prob. 5RQCh. 2.4 - Prob. 6RQCh. 2.4 - Prob. 7RQCh. 2.5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2.5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 1SPACh. 2 - Prob. 2SPACh. 2 - Prob. 3SPACh. 2 - Prob. 4SPACh. 2 - Prob. 5SPACh. 2 - Prob. 6SPACh. 2 - Prob. 7SPACh. 2 - Prob. 8SPACh. 2 - Prob. 9SPACh. 2 - Prob. 10SPACh. 2 - Prob. 11APACh. 2 - Prob. 12APACh. 2 - Prob. 13APACh. 2 - Prob. 14APACh. 2 - Prob. 15APACh. 2 - Prob. 16APACh. 2 - Prob. 17APACh. 2 - Prob. 18APACh. 2 - Prob. 19APACh. 2 - Prob. 20APACh. 2 - Prob. 21APACh. 2 - Prob. 22APACh. 2 - Prob. 23APACh. 2 - Prob. 24APACh. 2 - Prob. 25APA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Hi! I am stuck on this question, can you try to write the answer in a complete way and include any graphs that are asked for? Thank you in advance!arrow_forwardThe World Health Organization says that it is too costly to try to fully eradicate malaria. By using nets, medicine, and DDT it is possible to eliminate 90 percent of malaria cases. But to eliminate 100 percent of cases would be extremely costly. Describe how the opportunity cost of controlling malaria changes as more resources are used to reduce the number of malaria cases.arrow_forwardCompare and contrast allocative efficiency with productive efficiency, and analyze whether the current food system is efficient from a societal standpoint. Specifically, in the market for factory - farmed products, compare the existing equilibrium with a socially optimal equilibrium. What would be the socially optimal levels of demand and supply? Please provide a graphical representation using a demand and supply graph to support your answer.arrow_forward
- how does implication of standards within environmental economics look like on a graph?arrow_forwardQ) Imagine any number of identical boats can fish along the North Carolina coast. The value of fishing (V) per boat as a function of the number of boats (N) is: V = 50 − 5N. The marginal value (MV) to the fishery of an additional boat is: MV = 50 − 10N. For each boat, the costs of fishing (C) are $10. If the fishery were managed in a way that only the socially efficient # of boats are allowed to enter the fishery, what would be the net value (i.e., total value minus total costs) of the fishery? Correctly explain now. Not in excelarrow_forwardQ) Imagine any number of identical boats can fish along the North Carolina coast. The value of fishing (V) per boat as a function of the number of boats (N) is: V = 50 − 5N. The marginal value (MV) to the fishery of an additional boat is: MV = 50 − 10N. For each boat, the costs of fishing (C) are $10. If the fishery were managed in a way that only the socially efficient # of boats are allowed to enter the fishery, what would be the net value (i.e., total value minus total costs) of the fishery? Explain it early. Not solve in excel worksarrow_forward
- Q) Imagine any number of identical boats can fish along the North Carolina coast. The value of fishing (V) per boat as a function of the number of boats (N) is: V = 50 − 5N. The marginal value (MV) to the fishery of an additional boat is: MV = 50 − 10N. For each boat, the costs of fishing (C) are $10. If the fishery were managed in a way that only the socially efficient # of boats are allowed to enter the fishery, what would be the net value (i.e., total value minus total costs) of the fishery? Solve it early. Not in excelarrow_forwardA developing country implements pollution laws for the first time. Initially, there are some relatively cheap ways to reduce pollution and results are easily evident. After twenty years, they've found that the more one reduces pollution, the higher the marginal benefit. the lower the marginal benefit. the lower the marginal cost.arrow_forwardUse the model of environmental pollution to model the following changes in a polluting industry to: i) the socially optimal level of pollution; ii) the total abatement costs; and ii) the total damage costs (а) A new technology is invented that allows firms to reducе pollution associated with each level of production output. (b) The government announces a new commitnment to more strictly enforce current environmental regulations. (c) A new study finds the pollutant in question to be more carcinogenic than originally thought.arrow_forward
- a) What is meant by Pareto efficiency in economics? Explain. b) List two examples of market failures that are relevant for environmental economics.arrow_forwardA country is currently creating40 million tons of toxic waste per year. The table below shows the marginal costs and benefits of reducing the amount of toxic waste to various amounts. What level of toxic waste should the country reduce to?arrow_forwardDiscuss the role of microeconomics versus macroeconomics in agricultural economics.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
