Vitorio and Gary are about to attend manager's training session held at Missouri (headquarters of Company Vreeland Pharmaceuticals) and they are traveling together. During their travel, they discuss the importance of the meeting. Both of the men are quite disappointed to attend the meeting, as they already know how to deal with the employees. They feel that they are about to waste their time in the session. They add that at first, Vreeland will disclose that the meeting is not required for the managers. However, later he will support the HR to carry on with the meeting. Characters in the case: Vitorio, one of the managers attending the training Gary, one of the managers attending the training Vreeland, the owner of pharmaceuticals Connie, the HR in-charge of manager training sessions Adequate information: The meeting is mainly held to reduce the employees being fired for silly reasons and then apologizing for the same. The HR team feels guilty for such happenings due to the improper management and thus wants to create an error-free environment for all the employees. To determine: If Connie and her staff are right in imposing training for avoiding the mishaps of the manager.

Question

This discussion has three parts. Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some leaders are more flexible in applying a wide range of leadership styles, whereas others are more consistent and generally use just one or two preferred behaviors. Consider if two strong individuals begin a new company and discuss the following: If two diverse individuals, each having a different leadership style, were tasked with effectively co-leading an organization, what potential conflicts might occur between these different leadership styles? How will their personal leadership styles influence the organizational culture? How would you recommend that these two leaders work together most effectively?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1CFCA

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Vitorio and Gary are about to attend manager's training session held at Missouri (headquarters of Company Vreeland Pharmaceuticals) and they are traveling together. During their travel, they discuss the importance of the meeting. Both of the men are quite disappointed to attend the meeting, as they already know how to deal with the employees.

They feel that they are about to waste their time in the session. They add that at first, Vreeland will disclose that the meeting is not required for the managers. However, later he will support the HR to carry on with the meeting.

Characters in the case:

Vitorio, one of the managers attending the training

Gary, one of the managers attending the training

Vreeland, the owner of pharmaceuticals

Connie, the HR in-charge of manager training sessions

Adequate information:

The meeting is mainly held to reduce the employees being fired for silly reasons and then apologizing for the same. The HR team feels guilty for such happenings due to the improper management and thus wants to create an error-free environment for all the employees.

To determine:

If Connie and her staff are right in imposing training for avoiding the mishaps of the manager.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

This discussion has three parts. Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some leaders are more flexible in applying a wide range of leadership styles, whereas others are more consistent and generally use just one or two preferred behaviors. Consider if two strong individuals begin a new company and discuss the following: If two diverse individuals, each having a different leadership style, were tasked with effectively co-leading an organization, what potential conflicts might occur between these different leadership styles? How will their personal leadership styles influence the organizational culture? How would you recommend that these two leaders work together most effectively?

Refer to section 14-1 in your textbook, "Leaders versus Managers". Often times, I hear these words used interchangeably in business environments. As discussed in this section, Leaders and Managers are two very different roles. On a personal level, this is a favorite topic of mine and in every business course I teach, I like to take an opportunity to talk about: Leaders vs. Managers vs. Supervisors In your own words, tell us how you define each one of these roles. Are they the same to you? Are all leaders also managers or supervisors? Are all managers and supervisors automatically leaders? Are management and supervision the same things? Discuss...

You have just returned from a conference on leadership held in the lovely Southside of Chicago. You heard from a diverse range of interesting speakers such as Aaron ‘T-Bone’ Walker and Barrelhouse Chuck. However, it was Albert Collins talk on Authentic Leadership which you found the most interesting. Albert was quite critical of Authentic Leadership and since your boss, Eddy ‘The Chief’ Clearwater, wants to know more, he has asked you to prepare a summary for him. Outline the core criticisms of Authentic Leadership in practice AND as a theoretical framework in a memo to your boss. (400 words)