Case Summary:
SS company was established in 1892 which primarily sold watches via mail orders that relied on catalogs. The company changed the perspective of shopping as the catalog was delivered at their doorstep and the order was taken via mail. However, urban people's desire to purchase via standalone stores was also met as many stores were opened gradually. During the 1990s, there was a change in technology which also changed the way of shopping. People started purchasing goods online at competitive prices. Ss was burdened with overhead costs and was bureaucratic in nature. SS did not enter online marketing, but W’s profit grew. In 2004, SS was acquired by KEL, who acquired SS did not have retail experience but was an expert in finance. He acquired SS because he saw real estate value as the key. Under him, no importance was given to retailing stores, underinvestment was done in existing store maintenance, mismanagement was also an issue. Sales went down in 2013 and debt further escalated, and the company was losing annually $1 billion.
Interpretation:
Key causes of SS decline.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution- Choose a famous company and explain how each four Ps is successfularrow_forwardWhat are the business ownership structure for Procter & Gamble (P&G) and Pepsi corporation (e.g., partnership, sole proprietorship, conventional corporation, S corporation, limited liability corporation, non-profit (501c3), etc.)arrow_forwardCan anything save Sears? Support your position.arrow_forward
- SUBJECT - BUSINESS WHAT IS BUYING A FRANCHISE? (WRITE ABOUT A TO Z) EXPLAIN BRIEFLY.arrow_forwardIdentify and discuss the entrepreneur function(s) or activities that the MAYBANK company did, which led to the success/failure of the MAYBANK.arrow_forwardShould Playboy change their name and/or get into a new line of business? Why or why not? I do not believe it would be wise for Playboy to change their name or line of business. There is a lot of fame and popularity behind the name. Although Playboy might not be as popular as it once was, there are still individuals today that buy merchandise from the company just for its name. If the company were to change its name it would lose that credibility and popularity. There would be a loss of history behind the brand, which could decrease the overall profits and revenues of the company. Playboy is considered to be at the top of its industry, and changing its name would make it the same as every new brand coming into the industry. There would be no differentiation to persuade buyers. This would also make it incredibly difficult to market and campaign the brand because the brand would ultimately be the same as everyone else. Although if a change is truly needed, then Playboy could rebrand…arrow_forward