Microeconomics (13th Edition)
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780134744476
Author: Michael Parkin
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 12APA
To determine
Identify the attractive amount offered by the fruit-picking job.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
If opportunity cost of going to prison for a person falls,this person is less likely to commit a criminal act true or false?
An old lady is looking for help crossing the street. Only one person is needed to help her; if more people help her, this is no better. You and I are the two people in the vicinity who can help; we have to choose simultaneously whether to do so. Each of us will get pleasure worth a 3 from her success (no matter who helps her), But each one who goes to help will bear a cost of 1, this being the value of our time taken up in helping. If neither player helps, the payoff for each player is zero. Set up this game in strategic form.
Please ASAP this multiple choice question. Thank you.
In the 1980s , Boston developed Operation Ceasefire, which was meant to clearly describe the consequences of criminal activity to a tageted group of high risk repeat offenders. This type of program best represents which purpose of punishment?
A. Incapacitation
B. Retribution
C. General deterrence
D. Specific deterrence
Chapter 20 Solutions
Microeconomics (13th Edition)
Ch. 20.1 - Prob. 1RQCh. 20.1 - Prob. 2RQCh. 20.1 - Prob. 3RQCh. 20.1 - Prob. 4RQCh. 20.2 - Prob. 1RQCh. 20.2 - Prob. 2RQCh. 20.2 - Prob. 3RQCh. 20.2 - Prob. 4RQCh. 20.3 - Prob. 1RQCh. 20.3 - Prob. 2RQ
Ch. 20.3 - Prob. 3RQCh. 20.3 - Prob. 4RQCh. 20.4 - Prob. 1RQCh. 20.4 - Prob. 2RQCh. 20.4 - Prob. 3RQCh. 20 - Prob. 1SPACh. 20 - Prob. 2SPACh. 20 - Prob. 3SPACh. 20 - Prob. 4SPACh. 20 - Prob. 5SPACh. 20 - Prob. 6SPACh. 20 - Prob. 7APACh. 20 - Prob. 8APACh. 20 - Prob. 9APACh. 20 - Prob. 10APACh. 20 - Prob. 11APACh. 20 - Prob. 12APACh. 20 - Prob. 13APACh. 20 - Prob. 14APACh. 20 - Prob. 15APACh. 20 - Prob. 16APACh. 20 - Prob. 17APACh. 20 - Prob. 18APACh. 20 - Prob. 19APACh. 20 - Prob. 20APACh. 20 - Prob. 21APACh. 20 - Prob. 22APACh. 20 - Prob. 23APA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Two parties, Juan and Ben, have been negotiating the purchase by Ben of Juan's car. Juan receives a new and higher bid for his car from Adriana. How might Adriana's bid change Juan and Ben's threat values? The threat values are unchanged. Juan now values the car at the price of Adriana's bid, her bid is his opportunity cost of selling the car to Ben, and that opportunity cost is Juan's new threat value. Juan's new threat value is the product of the difference between Ben and Adriana's offers and the probability the car will be sold to Adriana. Juan's threat value is unchanged, but Ben has to consider his new opportunity costarrow_forwardA medical researcher is trying to cure a disease. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she generates a utility benefit of 10 for each member of society. There are 1,000 people in society besides the medical researcher. The medical researcher doesn’t care about other people. She is in it for the glory. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she gets a utility benefit of 1000 (which is inclusive of the 10 that she gets for being a member of society, plus a payoff of 990 in glory). If she exerts effort e, she also suffers cost e^2. (a) The medical researcher’s payoff from exerting effort e is 1000e − e^2. What level of effort, e∗, will she exert? (b) Suppose a policymaker who was a committed utilitarian (including caring about the medical researcher’s glory, since the medical researcher cares about it) was to choose the level of effort the medical researcher exerts. That policymaker would add up the total utility in society (including the medical researcher’s utility)…arrow_forwardA medical researcher is trying to cure a disease. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she generates a utility benefit of 10 for each member of society. There are 1,000 people in society besides the medical researcher. The medical researcher doesn’t care about other people. She is in it for the glory. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she gets a utility benefit of 1000 (which is inclusive of the 10 that she gets for being a member of society, plus a payoff of 990 in glory). If she exerts effort e, she also suffers cost e^2. (a) Suppose a policymaker who was a committed utilitarian (including caring about the medical researcher’s glory, since the medical researcher cares about it) was to choose the level of effort the medical researcher exerts. That policymaker would add up the total utility in society (including the medical researcher’s utility) from any given level of effort and choose the level of effort that maximizes that aggregate utility. i. What (social)…arrow_forward
- The Dean of a College is looking for a tenured professor to teach in the Core Curriculum. Monetary incentives are needed to get someone interested, but how much? The Dean decides to use an auction to do the job. Two professors, equally qualified, applied for the position. The two professors are invited to covertly submit their bids to the Dean. The Dean will give the position to the professor who submits the lower bid (if there is a tie, the job is assigned randomly). The professor who gets the job will be paid his/her own bid. Each professorís reservation value for teaching the course is his/her private information. It is common knowledge that their reservation values are independently and uniformly distributed over [0;100]: So if a professor with a reservation value of 60 wins with a bid of 50, his payoff is 60- 50 = 10: (A) Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the bidding game.(B) Suppose the two professorsíreservation values are 60 and 70, respectively. What are their bids in the…arrow_forwardd) Another classmate cares more about good grades: She gets 50 units of happiness for a B and 80 units of happiness for an A. If this classmate were your partner (but your preferences remained the same), how would your answers to parts (a) and (b) change? Which of the two classmates would you prefer as a partner? Would she also want you as a partner?arrow_forwardYou are selling $30 souvenir books for a club fund-raiser. How could you use the technique of lowballing to improve your sales?a. Start by offering the books at $70 each and pretend to bargain with customers, making $30 your “final offer.”b. Start by selling the books at $25, but once the customer has retrieved his or her checkbook, tell him or her you made a mistake and the books are actually $5 more than you thought.c.Offer the customers additional incentives to buy the book, such as free cookies with every purchase.d. Start by selling the books at $40, but tell the customer he or she will get $10 back in three weeks.arrow_forward
- there are 4,000 people that commute into a city each day. There is a local road that takes 30 minutes regardless of traffic. There is also a highways that takes 5 minutes when there is no traffic but where each additional driver adds .01 minute. a) Find the Nash Equilibria b) How many drivers should use the local road to maximize the societal benefit?arrow_forwardSuppose a person’s true value for a good they already are endowed with is v and they offer b > v in Becker-Degroot-Marschak task. Why would they be better off (or at least no worse off) bidding b = v?arrow_forwardThe Dean of Columbia College is looking for a tenured professor to teach in the Core Curriculum. Monetary incentives are needed to get someone interested, but how much? The Dean decides to use an auction to do the job. Two professors, equally qualified, applied for the position. The two professors are invited to covertly submit their bids to the Dean. The Dean will give the position to the professor who submits the lower bid (if there is a tie, the job is assigned randomly). The professor who gets the job will be paid his/her own bid. Each professors reservation value for teaching the course is his/her private information. It is common knowledge that their reservation values are independently and uniformly distributed over [0; 100]: So if a professor with a reservation value of 60 wins with a bid of 50, his payoff is 60 50 = 10: (a) Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the bidding game. (b) Suppose the two professorsíreservation values are 60 and 70, respec- tively. What are…arrow_forward
- Two athletes of equal ability are competing for a prize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether to take a dangerous performance enhancing drug. If one athlete takes the drug, and the other does not, the one who takes the drug wins the prize. If both or neither take the drug, they tie and split the prize. Taking the drug imposes health risks that are equivalent to a loss of X dollars. a) Draw a 2×2 payoff matrix describing the decisions the athletes face. b) For what X is taking the drug the Nash equilibrium? c) Does making the drug safer (that is, lowering X) make the athletes better or worse off? Explain.arrow_forwardWhat do you think of the ethics of using unconscious nudges to alter people’s behavior?arrow_forwardTrue or false: keeping his maximum willingness to pay for a yacht in mind, Tim will buy the yacht because it will be worth more to him than its market price of $350,000arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning