(a)
Identify the expected income.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
In the given case, there is a 50% chance to make $4,000 in a month and another 50% chance to make nothing. Therefore, the expected income of L can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected income of L is $2,000.
Expected income: Expected income is the money value that of what a person expects to own at a given point of time.
(b)
Identify the expected utility.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
The given graph shows that when the income is $4,000, the corresponding utility is 100; when the income is $0, then the corresponding utility is also 0. Now the expected utility can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected utility of L is 50.
Expected income: Expected income is the money value of what a person expects to own at a given point in time.
(c)
Identify the amount that is offered by another firm with certainty to persuade L not to take the risky sales job.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
The given graph shows that the expected utility of L is 50. The corresponding wealth in the graph along the x-axis is $1,250. Hence, L would have to be offered about $1,250 a month with certainty to persuade L not to take the risky sales job.
Expected income: Expected income is the money value of what a person expects to own at a given point in time.
Expected income: Expected income is the money value of what a person expects to own at a given point in time.
(d)
Identify the cost of risk.
(d)
Explanation of Solution
The cost of risk is the difference between the expected income and the certain income offered by the other firms to persuade L not to take the risky sales job. Thus, the cost of risk can be calculated as follows;
The amount of the cost of risk is $750.
Cost of risk: The cost of risk is found by comparing the expected wealth in a given risky situation with the wealth that gives the same utility with no risk.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Microeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (13th Edition)
- Natasha has utility function u(I) = (10*I)0.5, where I is her annual income (in thousands). (a) Is she a risk loving, risk averse or risk neutral individual? She is [risk loving, risk adverse, risk neutral] , as her utility function is [concave, convex, linear] (b) Suppose that she is currently earning an income of $40,000 (I = 40) and can earn that income next year with certainty. She is offered a chance to take a new job that offers a 0.6 probability of earning $44,000 and a 0.4 probability of earning $33,000. She should [take, not take] the new job because her expected utility of (approximately) [18.27,19.82,20,20.95,21.14] is [greater than, less than, equal to] her current utility of [18.27,19.85,20,20.95,21.14] .arrow_forwardSuppose you must choose between the two prospects, (40,000, 0.025) or (1,000): The prospect of winning 40,000 with a probability of 2.5% or winning 1,000 with certainty. Suppose, too, that the following three graphs represent your utility function (according to expected utility theory) and your weighting and value scales (according to prospect theory). Finally, suppose that your current wealth is 20,000. d. Based on prospect theory, which prospect would you choose? Why? e. Why is your decision different under the two theories? (Hint: what is one of the common human traits that prospect theory captures that expected utility theory cannot?)arrow_forwardAn investor has a power utility function with a coefficient of relative risk aversion of 3. Compare the utility that the investor would receive from a certain income of £2 with that generated by a lottery having equally likely outcomes of £1 and £3. Calculate the certain level of income which, for an investor with preferences as above, would generate identical expected utility to the lottery described. How much of the original certain income of £2 the investor would be willing to pay to avoid the lottery? Detail the calculations and carefully explain your answer.arrow_forward
- , and you are considering a self-employment opportunity that may pay $10,000 per year or $40,000 per year with equal probabilities. What certain income would provide the same satisfaction as the expected utility from the self-employed position? a) $22,500 b) $15,000 c) $27,500 d) $25,00arrow_forwardPLS ANS 7 URGENT H = ($100, 0.4; $200, 0.6) K = ($120,p, $300, 1- p) 6. EV(H) =EV(K) What value of p makes this statement true? 7. Carol owns prospect H and is interested in selling it. Her utility of wealth function is given by u(x) = x^0.5 . What is the lowest price for which Carol would be willing to sell prospect H?arrow_forwardKhalid has a utility function U = W1/2, where W is his wealth in millions of dollarsand U is the utility he obtains from the wealth. In a game show, the host offershim a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1million with probability 0.6 and $9 million with probability 0.4.i. Graph Khalid’s utility function with the help of above utility function. Ishe risk lover? Explain. ii. Does A or B choice offer Khalid a higher expected prize? Explain yourreasoning with appropriate calculations. iii. Does A or B offer Khalid a higher expected utility? Again, show yourcalculations. iv. Should Jamal pick A or B choice? Why?arrow_forward
- 2. Maria has $100. There is a 50% that she will lose all of it. Her utility as a functionof wealth is u(c) = √c. a. What is the maximum amount she would be willing to pay to fully insure againstthe 50% probability of the loss? b. Is she risk averse, risk loving, or risk neutral?arrow_forwardJamal has a utility function U = W1/2, where W is his wealth in millions of dollars and U is the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Jamal a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1 million with probability 0.6 and $9 million with probability 0.4. a. b. c. d. Graph Jamal’s utility function. Is he risk averse? Explain. (2+2) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected prize? Explain your reasoning with appropriate calculations. (1) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected utility? Explain your reasoning with calculations. (2) Should Jamal pick A or B? Why?arrow_forwardJamal has a utility function U= W1/2 where Wis his wealth in millions of 'dollars and Uis the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Jamal a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1million with a probability of 0.6 and $9 million with a probability of 0.4. a. Graph Jamal's utility function. Is he risk-averse? Explain. b. Does A or B offer, Jamal, a higher expected price? Explain your reasoning with appropriate calculations. (Hint: The expected value of a random variable is the weighted average of the possible outcomes, where the probabilities are the weights.) c. Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected utility? Again, show your calculations. d. Should Jamal pick A or B? Why?arrow_forward
- The manager of XYZ Company is introducing a new product that will yield $1,000 in profits if the economy does not go into a recession. However, if a recession occurs, demand for the normal good will fall so sharply that the company will lose $4,000. If economists project that there is a 10 percent chance the economy will go into a recession, what are the expected profits to XYZ Company of introducing the new product? How risky is the introduction of the new product?arrow_forwardGive typing answer with explanation and conclusion 1. If wH=100 and wL=36 and U(w)=w^1/2. Further, let the reservation utility be 7. (a) What is the minimum probability for which the wage earner accepts the contract? (b)Let p=3/4. What is the maximum cost of effort for which the tenant accepts the contract?arrow_forwardThe Healthcare Managers Team Challenge Question: Considering the same graph above, and assume that the probability of a hurricane in Springfield is 23% this coming summer: a) calculate the expected wealth and utility of the Simpson's residence; b) explain why Homer Simpson is likely to buy insurance, or why he might not be wanting to buy insurance. Note that if the hurricane takes place the value of the Simpsons' wealth will be $10,000. but if there is no hurricane, their wealth will remain at $20,000.arrow_forward
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning