You are an analyst working for Goldman Sachs, and you are trying to value the growth potential of a large, established company, Big Industries. Big Industries has a thriving R&D division that has consistently turned out successful products. You estimate that, on average, the R&D division generates two new product proposals every three years, so that there is a two-thirds chance that a project will be proposed every year. Typically, the investment opportunities the R&D division produces require an initial investment of $10 million and yield profits of $1 million per year that grow at one of three possible growth rates in perpetuity: 3%, 0%, and –3%. All three growth rates are equally likely for any given project. These opportunities are always “take it or leave it” opportunities: If they are not undertaken immediately, they disappear forever. Assume that the cost of capital will always remain at 12% per year. What is the
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 22 Solutions
Corporate Finance (4th Edition) (Pearson Series in Finance) - Standalone book
- Your boss has just presented you with the summary in the accompanying table of projected costs and annual receipts for a new product line. He asks you to calculate the IRR for this investment opportunity. What would you present to your boss, and how would you explain the results of your analysis? (It is widely known that the boss likes to see graphs of PW versus interest rate for this type of problem.) The company’s MARR is 10% per year.arrow_forwardQuiet Quilts is considering adding another division that requires a cash outlay of $29,500, and is expected to generate $6,500 in after-tax cash flows each year for seven years. The CFO has determined the new division's beta coefficient is 0.8. The market return is expected to be 11 percent and the risk-free rate of return is 4 percent. Should Quiet add the new division? Show your work.arrow_forwardImagine you are the manager of operations for a manufacturing company. Your vice president wants to expand production by building a new facility, and she would like you to develop a business case for the project. Assume that your company’s weighted average cost of capital is 13%, the after-tax cost of debt is 7%, preferred stock is 10.5%, and common equity is 15%. As you work on the business case, you surmise that this is a fairly risky project because of a recent slowing in product sales. In fact, when using the 13% weighted average cost of capital, you discover that the project is estimated to return about 10%, which is quite a bit less than the company’s weighted average cost of capital. Your vice president suggests that the project could be financed from a mix of retained earnings (50%) and bonds (50%). She reasons that retained earnings do not cost the company anything because it is cash you already have and the after-tax cost of debt is only 7%. That would lower your weighted…arrow_forward
- Imagine you are the manager of operations for a manufacturing company. Your vice president wants to expand production by building a new facility, and she would like you to develop a business case for the project. Assume that your company’s weighted average cost of capital is 13%, the after-tax cost of debt is 7%, preferred stock is 10.5%, and common equity is 15%. As you work on the business case, you surmise that this is a fairly risky project because of a recent slowing in product sales. In fact, when using the 13% weighted average cost of capital, you discover that the project is estimated to return about 10%, which is quite a bit less than the company’s weighted average cost of capital. Your vice president suggests that the project could be financed from a mix of retained earnings (50%) and bonds (50%). She reasons that retained earnings do not cost the company anything because it is cash you already have and the after-tax cost of debt is only 7%. That would lower your weighted…arrow_forwardAs part of their investment strategy, the Carringtons have decided to put $100,000 into stock market investments and also into purchasing precious metals. The performance of the investments depends on the state of the economy in the next year. In an expanding economy, it is expected that their stock market investment will outperform their investment in precious metals, whereas an economic recession will have precisely the opposite effect. Suppose the following payoff matrix gives the expected percentage increase or decrease in the value of each investment for each state of the economy. Expanding Economic economy recession Stock market investment Commodity investment 20 10 -10 15 (a) Determine the optimal investment strategy for the Carringtons' investment of $100,000. (Round your answers to the nearest dollar.) stocks $ commodities $ (b) What profit can the Carringtons expect to make on their…arrow_forwardAs part of their investment strategy, the Carringtons have decided to put $100,000 into stock market investments and also into purchasing precious metals. The performance of the investments depends on the state of the economy in the next year. In an expanding economy, it is expected that their stock market investment will outperform their investment in precious metals, whereas an economic recession will have precisely the opposite effect. Suppose the following payoff matrix gives the expected percentage increase or decrease in the value of each investment for each state of the economy. Expanding Economic economy recession Stock market investment Commodity investment 30 5 -10 20 (a) Determine the optimal investment strategy for the Carringtons' investment of $100,000. (Round your answers to the nearest dollar.) stocks $ commodities $arrow_forward
- Your company is considering a high-risk project that could yield strong revenues but will involve a significant up-front investment. Because of this risk, top management is naturally concerned about how long it is likely to take to pay off that investment so that they can begin to realize profits. This project will require an investment of $200,000 and your five-year projection for inflows is: Year 1 – $50,000, Year 2 – $75,000, Year 3 – $125,000, Year 4 – $200,000, and Year 5 – $250,000. Your firm’s required rate of return is 18%. How long will it take to pay back your initial investment? Determine the answer to this question by using an excel file to determine the “Payback Period.” Note:The Payback period does not use the “time value of money” or “discounted-payback” method. Determine the answer to this question by using an excel file to determine the “Net Present Value of Money (NPV)” method. Note: The NPV method uses the“time value of money” or “discounted payback” method..arrow_forwardThe vice president of operations at Dintell Corporation, a majorsupplier of passenger-side automotive air bags, is considering a$50 million expansion at the firm’s Fort Worth, Texas, produc-tion complex. The most recent economic projections indicate a0.60 probability that the overall market will be $400 million per year over the next five years and a 0.40 probability that the mar-ket will be only $200 million per year during the same period.The marketing department estimates that Dintell has a 0.50probability of capturing 40 percent of the market and an equalprobability of obtaining only 30 percent of the market. The costof goods sold is estimated to be 70 percent of sales. For planningpurposes, the company currently uses a 12 percent discountrate, a 40 percent tax rate, and the MACRS depreciation sched-ule. The criteria for investment decisions at Dintell are (1) thenet expected present value must be greater than zero; (2) theremust be at least a 70 percent chance that the net present…arrow_forwardYou are trying to decide whether to make an investment of $500 million in a new technology to produce Everlasting Gobstoppers. There is 60% chance that the market for these candies will produce profits of $100 million annually in perpetuity, and a 40% chance that the market will produce profits of only $20 million per year in perpetuity. The size of the market will become clear one year from now. Assume the cost of investment is the same this year or next year and the cost of capital of this project is 10% p.a.. The value of the option to wait is around: a. $400 million b. $0 million c. $36 million d. $93 million e. None of the abovearrow_forward
- If you were the CFO of a company that had to decide on hundreds of potential projects every year, would you want to use sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis as described in the chapter, or would the amount of arithmetic required take too much time and thus not be cost-effective? What involvement would non-financial people such as those in marketing, accounting, and production have in the analysis?arrow_forwardYou are a consultant who has been hired to evaluate a new product line for Markum Enterprises. The upfront investment required to launch the product line is $8 million. The product will generate free cash flow of $0.70 million the first year, and this free cash flow is expected to grow at a rate of 6% per year. Markum has an equity cost of capital of 10.8%, a debt cost of capital of 6.38%, and a tax rate of 25%. Markum maintains a debt-equity ratio of 0.50. a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? b. How much debt will Markum initially take on as a result of launching this product line? c. How much of the product line's value is attributable to the present value of interest tax shields? Question content area bottom Part 1 a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? The NPV of the new product line is million. (Round to two decimal places.) Part 2 b. How much debt will…arrow_forwardYou are a consultant who has been hired to evaluate a new product line for Markum Enterprises. The upfront investment required to launch the product line is $8 million. The product will generate free cash flow of $0.70 million the first year, and this free cash flow is expected to grow at a rate of 6% per year. Markum has an equity cost of capital of 10.8%, a debt cost of capital of 6.38%, and a tax rate of 25%. Markum maintains a debt-equity ratio of 0.50. a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? b. How much debt will Markum initially take on as a result of launching this product line? c. How much of the product line's value is attributable to the present value of interest tax shields? Question content area bottom Part 1 a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? The NPV of the new product line is $enter your response here million. (Round to two decimal places.)arrow_forward
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education