The reason for the series of vaccination is necessary against hepatitis B. Introduction: Vaccination or immunization is the process of inducing immune response against specific pathogens by introducing an attenuated form of immunogens into the host. It is a form of artificial active immunity which protects us from the real threat when we are exposed to them.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 24RQ

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The reason for the series of vaccination is necessary against hepatitis B.

Introduction:

Vaccination or immunization is the process of inducing immune response against specific pathogens by introducing an attenuated form of immunogens into the host. It is a form of artificial active immunity which protects us from the real threat when we are exposed to them.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Pathology (How does the hepatitis B disease affect the body? what the disease hepatitis B does to the organ system? What are the common changes to body function that the disease hepatitis B creates?

A woman was hit by a car and complained of injuries to her leg, knee, hip, and thigh. She was taken to the nearest hospital, where, on the orders of a physician, she received X-rays of her arm and pelvis. No X-ray was taken of her leg, and she was released from the hospital on crutches. The pain in her leg increased, and she went to another hospital some hours later, where an X-ray was taken and revealed that her leg was fractured. She was admitted to the second hospital and remained an inpatient for a month. Ten days after admission to the second hospital, she received a letter from the first hospital telling her to return for a leg X-ray. She sued the first hospital and the radiologist. Does the radiologist, who never saw her, have a contractual relationship with the patient?

A woman was hit by a car and complained of injuries to her leg, knee, hip, and thigh. She was taken to the nearest hospital, where, on the orders of a physician, she received X-rays of her arm and pelvis. No X-ray was taken of her leg, and she was released from the hospital on crutches. The pain in her leg increased, and she went to another hospital some hours later, where an X-ray was taken and revealed that her leg was fractured. She was admitted to the second hospital and remained an inpatient for a month. Ten days after admission to the second hospital, she received a letter from the first hospital telling her to return for a leg X-ray. She sued the first hospital and the radiologist. Does the radiologist, who never saw her, have a contractual relationship with the patient? I believe the radiologist does have a contractual relationship with the patients because they are the one reading the X-rays and making the diagnosis to the doctor. The patient was right in suing the hospital…