Subpart (a):
The preventive health care cost effectiveness.
Subpart (a):
Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $15,000. The medical expense saved after setting up of the screening system is $5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The preventive health care measures are those medical precautionary measures which help the people to stay healthy and free from diseases. The screening system helps the people to easily identify and detect various diseases in their early stages which will help them to treat the diseases easily and affordably without much hassle.
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense of 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result positive is 15%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 15 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense that can be saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $15,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $15,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Thus, the net medical expense saved after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is $5,000.
Concept introduction:
Preventive health care: They are the measures taken in order to prevent the occurrence of a disease rather than treatment of a disease.
Sub part (b):
The net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of screening test.
Sub part (b):
Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $5,000. The medical expense lost after setting up of the screening system is -$5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense for 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result as positive is 5%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 5 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $5,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $5,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Since the result is having a negative sign, it shows that the expense of setting up the screening system is higher than the benefit received from the use of the screening system. Thus, the net result is a loss. Thus, the net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is -$5,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 22 Solutions
Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies (20th Global Edition)
- only typed answer Suppose that the market demand for medical care is summarized by the demand function: Qd = 100-2p and the market supply is summarized by the supply function: Qs= =20+2p (1) Calculate the equilibrium quantity and price, assuming no health insurance is available. (2) Suppose that health insurance is made available that provides for a 20 percent coinsurance rate. Calculate the new equilibrium price and quantity. (Hint: How does the demand curve shift?) (3) Calculate the deadweight loss due to this insurance.arrow_forwardSuppose that the price elasticity for hip replacement surgeries is 0.2. Further suppose that hip replacement surgeries are originally not covered by health insurance and that at a price of $50,000 each, 10,000 such surgeries are demanded each year. LO24.2 a. Suppose that health insurance begins to cover hip replacement surgeries and that everyone interested in getting a hip replacement has health insurance. If insurance covers 50 percent of the cost of the surgery, by what percentage would you expect the quantity demanded of hip replacements to increase? What if insurance covered 90 percent of the price? If insurance covers 50 percent of the bill, just assume that the price paid by consumers falls 50 percent.) b. Suppose that with insurance companies covering 90 percent of the price, the increase in demand leads to a jump in the price per hip surgery from $50,000 to $100,000. How much will each insured patient now pay for a hip replacement surgery? Compared to the original situation,…arrow_forwardSuppose a particular population has two kinds of health risks, high and low. Let the expected annual health care costs for the high risk be $10,000, and for the low risk, half that. If there are twice as many low risk as high risk individuals, and if the one insurer’s administrative load is 20%, what would the community rated premium be if everyone is compelled to and able to buy health insurance? Note: administrative load can be construed as the amount that the insurer has in costs to run the plans above and beyond the "health care costs."arrow_forward
- assume there are two types of workers, low- and high-ability, and let 0 = 0.25 be the proportion of high-ability workers in the population. Assume their marginal productivity and, therefore, their wages are wh = $20 and wl = $16, and that both types can use college education to signal high ability. The cost of college education for low-ability workers is cl = $5 whereas the cost for high-ability workers is ch = $2. How much do firms pay to each worker type when they cannot differentiate them? (a) wh = $20 and wl = $16 (b) wh = $2 and wl = $5 (c) w = $17 (d) w = $18arrow_forwardAtl Econ J (2013) 41:8991DOI 10.1007/s11293-012-9342-2ANTHOLOGYSocial Capital and Income Inequality in the UnitedStatesRati RamPublished online: 17 October 2012# International Atlantic Economic Society 2012Many scholars have explored in recent years various correlates and consequences ofsocial capital along with discussions of the concept. For example, relationship ofsocial capital with population happiness, health, income, economic growth, andhuman development has been researched by several scholars. However, very fewstudies have considered the relationship between social capital and income inequality.One exception to that is the recent work by Robison et al. (Journal of SocioEconomics, 2011) which proposed a theoretical link between social capital andincome distribution and conducted an empirical exploration for the U.S. states forthe census years 1980, 1990, and 2000. Their key measure of social capital wassomewhat narrowly focused on percent of households headed by a single female…arrow_forwardSuppose, if ill, that Fred’s demand for health services is summarized by the demand curve Q = 50 − 2P , where P is the price of services. How many services does he buy at a price of $20? Suppose that Fred’s probability of illness is 0.25. What is the actuarially fair price of health insurance for Fred with a zero coinsurance rate? If the insurance company pays Fred’s entire loss, will the insurance company offer him insurance at the actuarially fair rate? Why? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
- (Last Word) The combined cost of Social Security and Medicare programs was what percent of U.S. GDP in 2008 (A) 7.6 (B) 12.4 (C) 17.2 (D) 2.9arrow_forward9) In which of the following countries does health insurance not pay for most preventive care procedures? A) Canada B) Japan C) the United Kingdom D) the United States 10) Substantial co-payments are typically not required as a part of the health care system in A) Canada and the United Kingdom. B) Japan and Canada. C) the United States and Japan. D) Japan and the United Kingdom. 11) The largest government-run health care system in the world, with 1.7 million employees, is the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. The NHS receives its funding primarily from A) tariffs. B) the World Health Organization. C) income taxes. D) private businesses. 12) Typically, the ________ in a country, the higher the level of spending per person on health care. A) higher the level of income per person B) larger the population C) higher the level of income taxes D) lower the median age of the population 13) In ________, health care spending per person…arrow_forwardDue to an increased number of patients seeking COVID-19 tests and counseling, the clinic and the counseling centre at the leading public hospital was converted to provide both health screening services and counseling services. Using all of its staff, the clinic can screen a maximum of 10 clients or it can counsel 6 clients. Using all of its staff, the counseling centre can screen a maximum of 6 clients or counsel 12 clients. Who has the absolute advantage in health screening? Who has the absolute advantage in counseling services? Who has a comparative advantage in health screening? Who has a comparative advantage in counseling services? What is the opportunity cost of counseling services?arrow_forward
- Suppose a particular population has two kinds of health risks, high and low. Let the expected annual health care costs for the high risk be $10,000 and for the low risk, half that. If there are twice as many low risk as high risk individuals, and if the one insurer's administrative load is 20%, what would the community rated premium be if everyone is compelled to and able to buy health insurance?arrow_forwardFaustian health economics. Consider Figure 11.10, which shows the locus of feasible contracts for the population of the nation of Pcoria. In which corner of this diagram (northeast, southeast, northwest, or southwest) is utility highest for consumers? What prevents insurance companies from offering contracts in this corner? On your own version of Figure 11.10, plot new points to represent where the market would be under (i) a nationally mandated full insurance policy and (ii) an insurance ban. Would a nationally mandated full insurance policy be optimal for Pcoria? What about an insurance ban?arrow_forward7. Oster (2020) “Health Recommendations and Selection in Health Behaviors” which found that spurious links between health behaviours and good health outcomes can be self-reinforcing if individuals who engage follow the recommendation also engage in other positive health behaviours. a) Briefly describe in your own (layperson) words what this implies about false positive findings and null findings. b) Can you think of an example where the opposite is true? That is, individuals who follow the recommendation also engage in negative health behaviors. c) Suppose a medical examiner (coroner) is deciding the cause of death of a recently deceased patient. The patient overdosed and is unclear whether the overdose was accidental or intentional (i.e., suicide). The medical examiner remembers hearing on the news that morning that suicides have been rising in recent years. What does this imply about the likely cause of death the medical examiner will record on the death certificate? What does this…arrow_forward
