Auditing And Assurance Services
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780134897431
Author: ARENS, Alvin A.
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 23, Problem 4RQ
To determine
Explain the distinction between bank confirmation and positive confirmation of accounts receivable. And, also explain the difference in terms of the nature of information confirmed, the sample size, and the appropriate action when the confirmation is not returned after second request and also explain the rationale for differences between these types of confirmation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
How do bank confirmations differ from positive confirmations ofaccounts receivable? Distinguish between them in terms of the nature of the informationconfirmed, the sample size, and the appropriate action when the confirmation is notreturned after the second request. Explain the rationale for the differences between thesetwo types of confirmations
Why is it more important to search for unrecorded notes payablethan for unrecorded notes receivable? Suggest audit procedures that the auditor can useto uncover unrecorded notes payable.
Explain why, in verifying bank reconciliations, most auditorsemphasize the possibility of a nonexistent deposit in transit being included in the reconciliation and an outstanding check being omitted rather than the omission of a depositin transit and the inclusion of a nonexistent outstanding check
Chapter 23 Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
Ch. 23 - Explain the relationships among the initial...Ch. 23 - Prob. 2RQCh. 23 - Prob. 3RQCh. 23 - Prob. 4RQCh. 23 - Prob. 5RQCh. 23 - Prob. 6RQCh. 23 - Prob. 7RQCh. 23 - Prob. 8RQCh. 23 - Prob. 9RQCh. 23 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 23 - Prob. 11RQCh. 23 - Prob. 12RQCh. 23 - Prob. 13RQCh. 23 - Prob. 14RQCh. 23 - Prob. 15.1MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 15.2MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 15.3MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 16.1MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 16.2MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 16.3MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 17.1MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 17.2MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 17.3MCQCh. 23 - Prob. 18DQPCh. 23 - Prob. 19DQPCh. 23 - Prob. 20DQPCh. 23 - Prob. 21DQPCh. 23 - Prob. 22DQPCh. 23 - You are doing the first-year audit of Sherman...Ch. 23 - Prob. 24DQPCh. 23 - Prob. 25DQPCh. 23 - The amount of subjectivity involved in...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Which of the following does not explain the differences between the bank statement balance and the customers cash balance? a. Deposit in transit b. Canceled checks c. An NSF check d. Errors e. Interest incomearrow_forwardWhich of the following tests of details most likely would help an auditor determine whether accounts payable have been misstated?a. Examining reported purchase returns that appear too low. b. Examining vendor statements for amounts not reported as purchases. c. Searching for customer-returned goods that were not reported as returns. d. Reviewing bank transfers recorded as cash received from customers.arrow_forwardWhich of the following is most closely related to the relevance of audit evidence?a. Auditors decide to physically inspect investment securities held by a custodian instead of obtaining confirmations from the custodian.b. In addition to confirmations of accounts receivable, auditors perform an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable to evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable.c. In response to less effective internal control, auditors increase the number of customer accounts receivable confirmations mailed compared to that in the prior year.d. Because of a large number of transactions occurring near year-end, auditors decide to confirm a larger number of receivables following year-end instead of during the interim period.arrow_forward
- When preparing a bank reconciliation, if the adjusted book balance and the adjusted bank balance are equal, then there is no need to have an external auditor test internal controls for the "cash" account. True or Falsearrow_forwardChoose the one correct answer. Which of the following statements is invalid relating to confirmation of accounts receivable? a. A negative form of confirmation is preferable to use when individual account balances of customers are relatively smallb. A positive confirmation provides more reliable evidence than the negative confirmation because the auditor can perform follow-up procedures if no response is received from the debtorc. An auditor must consider using the negative form of confirmation when there is reason to believe that there may be a substantial number of accounts in dispute or with inaccuracies or irregularitiesd. In negative confirmation, failure to reply must be regarded as a correct response, even though the debtor may have ignored the confirmation requeste. None of the abovearrow_forwardChoose the one correct answer Which of the following statements is valid relating to confirmation of accounts receivable? * a. A positive confirmation provides more reliable evidence than the negative confirmation because the auditor can perform follow-up procedures if no response is received from the debtorB. A negative form of confirmation is preferable to use when individual account balances of customers are relatively largec. In positive confirmation, failure to reply must be regarded as a correct response, even though the debtor may have ignored the confirmation requestd. An auditor must consider using the negative form of confirmation when there is reason to believe that there may be a substantial number of accounts in dispute or with inaccuracies or irregularitiese. None of the abovearrow_forward
- Evidence comes in various types and has different degrees of reliability. Below are some pairs of various types of evidence: A bank confirmation versus observation of the segregation of duties between cash receipts and recording payment in the accounts receivable subsidiary ledger. An auditor’s recalculation of depreciation versus examination of raw material requisitions. A bank statement included in the client’s records versus the client’s shipping documents. Required: For each pair, indicate which type of evidence is more reliable. Justify your choicesarrow_forwardOn receiving the bank cutoff statement, the auditor should trace:arrow_forwardWhen assessing the danger of substantial falsification of the financial accounts, what is the ethical value of utilizing the Fraud Triangle?arrow_forward
- Which of the following statements is invalid relating to confirmation of accounts receivable? a. A negative form of confirmation is preferable to use when individual account balances of customers are relatively smallb. A positive confirmation provides more reliable evidence than the negative confirmation because the auditor can perform follow-up procedures if no response is received from the debtorc. An auditor must consider using the negative form of confirmation when there is reason to believe that there may be a substantial number of accounts in dispute or with inaccuracies or irregularitiesd. In negative confirmation, failure to reply must be regarded as a correct response, even though the debtor may have ignored the confirmation requeste. None of the abovearrow_forwardWhen auditing contingent liabilities, which of the following procedures would be MOST effective? a. Reviewing the allowance for doubtful accounts. b. Reviewing the bank cutoff statement. c. Examining customer confirmation replies. d. Examining invoices for repairs expense. e. Abstracting the minutes of the board of directors.arrow_forwardIn auditing accounts receivable, the negative form of confirmations request is used when A. Response rate to positive confirmation request was low B. The total amount of account receivable is immaterial to the financial statement taken as a whole C. Recipients are likely to return positive confirmation without verifying the information D. The combined assessed level of both inherent risk and control risk relative to account receivable is lowarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
College Accounting (Book Only): A Career ApproachAccountingISBN:9781337280570Author:Scott, Cathy J.Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
College Accounting (Book Only): A Career Approach
Accounting
ISBN:9781337280570
Author:Scott, Cathy J.
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub