Case summary : The company LI sells the only style of catridge which works with the company’s printer. The other companies acquired the used cartridges and refurbished them to sell them in competition with LI. The company offered a twenty percent discount to customers if they returned the used cartridges of the company. The company SSC was involved in making and selling of the remanufactured cartridges. LI released an advertisement to claim that the products sold by the company are violating the patent rights of LI. A legal suit was filed by LI in federal district court for violation of the intellectual property right. The company SSC countered the claim by alleging that the company LI did false advertisement. The counterclaim was dismissed and the court ordered that company SSC had no right to sue the company LI. Company SSC appealed to the appellate court. The appellate court reversed the decision. The company LI appealed to the supreme court and won.
To find: Whether SSC is entitled to relief under the court’s ruling.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 24 Solutions
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
- Nicolette Larson was loading the dishwasher with her husband, Kevin, and telling him about the first meeting of the Manchester United Tournament Organizing Committee. Nicolette, a self-confessed “soccer mom,” had been elected tournament director and was responsible for organizing the club’s first summer tournament. Manchester United Soccer Club (MUSC), located in Manchester, New Hampshire, was formed in 1992 as a way of bringing recreational players to a higher level of com-petition and preparing them for the State Olympic Development Program and/or high school teams. The club currently has 24 boys and girls (ranging in age from under 9 to 16) on teams affiliated with the New Hampshire Soccer Association and the Granite State Girls Soccer League. The club’s board of directors decided in the fall to sponsor a summer invitational soccer tournament to generate revenue. Given the boom in youth soccer, hosting summer tournaments has become a popular method for raising funds. MUSC teams…arrow_forwardNicolette Larson was loading the dishwasher with her husband, Kevin, and telling him about the first meeting of the Manchester United Tournament Organizing Committee. Nicolette, a self-confessed “soccer mom,” had been elected tournament director and was responsible for organizing the club’s first summer tournament. Manchester United Soccer Club (MUSC), located in Manchester, New Hampshire, was formed in 1992 as a way of bringing recreational players to a higher level of com-petition and preparing them for the State Olympic Development Program and/or high school teams. The club currently has 24 boys and girls (ranging in age from under 9 to 16) on teams affiliated with the New Hampshire Soccer Association and the Granite State Girls Soccer League. The club’s board of directors decided in the fall to sponsor a summer invitational soccer tournament to generate revenue. Given the boom in youth soccer, hosting summer tournaments has become a popular method for raising funds. MUSC teams…arrow_forwardState law trade secret protections cover confidential information relating to: Group of answer choices -formulas, customer lists, methods, and processes -business tax returns and “tax return information” as defined under federal law -articles of incorporation, corporate bylaws, and board resolutions -All of thesearrow_forward
- Typically what are the sections of an IS policy.arrow_forward88 Which of the following situations is acceptable according to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)? A) A mortaage broker refers a settlement to a borrower and discloses that the agent will receive a portion of the settie fee. B) A mortgage broker refers a borrower to a settlement attorney in exchange for free legal services in the future C) A mortgage lender refers a title company to a borrower and provides a disclosure detailing the nature of the business relationshio and the estimated charges. the title company. D) A mortgage lender refers a real estate broker to a borrower after giving the borrower a prequalification, and the lender receives a portion of the real estate broker's commission.arrow_forwardNeed a long and detailed self-explanatory analysis of the following case after hearing the oral argument of the case in Oyez Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miamiarrow_forward
- A dentai OTTice aoesn't have accessible parking spots. When a patient with mobility challenges complains, the receptionist tells him that because the office is not bound by the Fair Housing Act, the office is not required to have accessible parking spots. Did the receptionist respond correctly? Yes. The receptionist is correct that the office is not covered by the Fair Housing Act, which only covers residential housing. She was not required by any law to provide the patient with accessible parking. Yes. Disability is not a protected class under any federal law. No. A dental office is a public accommodation and therefore covered by the Fair Housing Act, which requires accessibility. No. A dental office is a public accommodation and therefore covered by the ADA. whicharrow_forward10. You were in a dilemma when you received a claim and request for adjustment from Ahlam who is one of your main customers. Ahlam was clearly at fault, but you know that if you refuse her claim, you will not only lose her but also her friends and followers on social media who will hear only one side of the story. As a result, you decide to grant Ahlam her claim and to grant her the adjustment she requested. For your reply to be effective, it must: * A.Point fingers to a third party who was responsible for this unpleasant situation. B.Imply that you will grant all of Ahlam’s claims to keep her satisfied always. C.Make an exaggerated apology so Ahlam can excuse you. D.Educate Ahlam about steps needed to avoid similar outcomes in the future. E.Make an exaggerated apology so Ahlam doesn’t give a negative review on social media.arrow_forwardAccording to the case FTC v Standard Education, Question 11 options: The Court advocated a change of standard from the ignorant-consumer standard to the reasonable-person standard The Court set a precedent that unless an advertisement makes a obviously false claim, an advertisement is not deceptive The Court advocated a change of standard from the reasonable-person standard to the gullible-consumer standard The rule of caveat emptor should be the guiding principle in deciding consumer fraud casesarrow_forward
- Answer the following, citing relevant legislation and case law in your answer: a) List and explain the exceptions to the parol evidence rule.arrow_forwardBusiness law topic - explain the of Free Consent (be importance very detail)arrow_forwardGilcorp sells eggs to customers one day for $3.00 per dozen. The following day they sell their eggs for $4.25 per dozen. Which of the following is true of this action? a) This is legal b) This is illegal per se c) This may be illegal under the rule of reasonarrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education