Explain the reason for the enactment of Robinson–Patman Act, the Wheeler–Lea Act, and the Celler–Kefauver Antimerger Act.
Explanation of Solution
Robinson–Patman Act is one of the provisions, which constitutes the U.S. antitrust policy that is passed in 1936. The basic purpose of enacting Robinson–Patman Act is to reduce the failure rate and prevent small sellers from the larger sellers from offering a different price to a different customer, unreasonably lowing prices and growing the chain stores.
Wheelers–Lea Act is one of the provisions, which constitutes the U.S. antitrust policy that is passed in 1983. The basic purpose of enacting Wheelers–Lea Act is to authorize the power to take action against deceptive and unfair methods of trade proactive like false advertisement and provide misleading information.
Celler–Kefauver Antimerger Act is one of the provisions, which constitutes the U.S antitrust policy that is passed in 1950. The basic purpose of enacting Celler–Kefauver Antimerger Act is to prohibit mergers by the sale of physical assets, if the effect is to significantly limit the competition.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 25 Solutions
Bundle: Economics, Loose-leaf Version, 13th + MindTap Economics, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card
- To what extent would you consider the setting up of regulatory bodies an appropriate and effective solution to the principal-agent problem in markets where there is a natural monopoly?arrow_forwardDefine market power, and then discuss the rationale for government regulation of firms with market power.arrow_forwardUnsure which is the correct answer The Clayton Act of 1914 classifies several business practices as illegal, including price discrimination and tying contracts, if they "substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly." The Clayton Act of 1914 is an example of which of the following? Price regulations or antitrust lawsarrow_forward
- How antitrust policy and industrial organization is related?arrow_forwardIndentify two of the three main types of antitrust case and gicve an example of eacharrow_forwardIn some regulated industries, regulatory agencies pre-vented prices from falling, and as a result many firms opened for business in those industries. Is this kind of regulation competitive or anticompetitive? Is it a good idea or a bad one?arrow_forward
- Which of the following is true of antitrust laws in the United States? Group of answer choices Economists unanimously agree on the usefulness of antitrust action to increase the competitiveness of industries. They were embedded in the U.S. Constitution but mostly eliminated in the early 1900s. The Sherman Act in 1980 eliminated and repealed all existing U.S. anti-trust laws. Historically they have been abused by some competitors going after other competitors in ways that are detrimental to consumers.arrow_forwardWhich of the following organizations is exempt from prosecution under the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)? retailers labor unions television stations book publishersarrow_forwardWhat does your answer in part e imply about antitrust policy towards mergers of firms selling complementary goods (such as airplanes and engines, computers and processors, cars and tire companies, etc.)?arrow_forward
- How does the antitrust treatment of price discrimination, tying contracts, and exclusive dealing contracts in the European Union compare with their treatment in the United States?arrow_forwarda. “Government should regulate mergers between firms” Give reason in favor and against this statement. (arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co