The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA. To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 25, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA.

To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In order to get relief from the court, the citizens need to provide evidence. The evidence can be provided in the form of an increased number of victims suffering from the lung disease. The harm caused to the people because of the emissions from the factories. Under the nuisance doctrine, to obtain relief from pollution, a property owner has to identify distinct harm from the rest of the people. The property owners are the victims in the above case, who are suffering from lung disease due to the smog released by the company CDA.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

a 45 year old patient was under doctor care for the past twenty years for chronic arthritis, trying many different drugs without success. A new drug appeared having been ceritifed by health canada and the doctor explained that like all the rest, the drug would have a range of side effects, among which was possible depression. The patient took the drug and within a week suffered a mood swing and committed suicide. Concerned by this new and two other cases, Health Canada suspended the drug from Canada, pending durtehr review. The family of deceased sued the paharmaceautical maker and Health Canada. Aside form issues of the doctor's possible professional liability, discuss the issues of manufacturer's liability and negligence raised in this scenario

Ford and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company is one of unsuccessful crisis management in the organization. The Ford-Firestone Tire and Rubber Company dispute transpired in August 2000. In response to claims that their 15-inch Wilderness AT, radial ATX and ATX II tire treads were separating from the tire core—leading to crashes— Bridgestone/Firestone recalled 6.5 million tires. These tires were mostly used on the Ford Explorer, the world's top selling sport utility vehicle (SUV). The two companies committed three major blunders early on, say crisis experts. First, they blamed consumers for not inflating their tires properly. Then they blamed each other for faulty tires and faulty vehicle design. Then they said very little about what they were doing to solve a problem that had caused more than 100 deaths—until they got called to Washington to testify before Congress. Describe THREE [3] ways how THE PRINCIPLE OF GOVERNANCE in Stakeholder Theory can overcome the crisis…

MAN BITTEN BY CROCODILE HE MISTOOK AS ANIMAL STATUE NOW OUT OF DANGER CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY—A 68-year-old man bitten by a crocodile he mistook as an animal statue in a resort in this city is now out of danger. Mercy Joy Chipada, daughter of victim Nehemias Chipada, said her father was recuperating at the Northern Mindanao Medical Center after surgery on his left arm. On Nov. 10, Chipada, along with family members, went to Amaya View, a mountain resort in Barangay Indahag that overlooks the city’s urban district, to celebrate his birthday. Photos posted on social media showed Chipada and family members posing and taking pictures with concrete replicas of animals in Noah’s Ark, one of the amenities in the resort. A video also showed Chipada climbing down a few feet to get near the unmoving reptile and tapping its head, thinking it was just a statue. He waded in the shallow pond where the crocodile, moments after the head-tapping, locked its jaws on the old man’s left arm. Seconds after,…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 25, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA.

To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In order to get relief from the court, the citizens need to provide evidence. The evidence can be provided in the form of an increased number of victims suffering from the lung disease. The harm caused to the people because of the emissions from the factories. Under the nuisance doctrine, to obtain relief from pollution, a property owner has to identify distinct harm from the rest of the people. The property owners are the victims in the above case, who are suffering from lung disease due to the smog released by the company CDA.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 25, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA.

To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In order to get relief from the court, the citizens need to provide evidence. The evidence can be provided in the form of an increased number of victims suffering from the lung disease. The harm caused to the people because of the emissions from the factories. Under the nuisance doctrine, to obtain relief from pollution, a property owner has to identify distinct harm from the rest of the people. The property owners are the victims in the above case, who are suffering from lung disease due to the smog released by the company CDA.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 25, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA.

To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In order to get relief from the court, the citizens need to provide evidence. The evidence can be provided in the form of an increased number of victims suffering from the lung disease. The harm caused to the people because of the emissions from the factories. Under the nuisance doctrine, to obtain relief from pollution, a property owner has to identify distinct harm from the rest of the people. The property owners are the victims in the above case, who are suffering from lung disease due to the smog released by the company CDA.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 25, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA.

To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In order to get relief from the court, the citizens need to provide evidence. The evidence can be provided in the form of an increased number of victims suffering from the lung disease. The harm caused to the people because of the emissions from the factories. Under the nuisance doctrine, to obtain relief from pollution, a property owner has to identify distinct harm from the rest of the people. The property owners are the victims in the above case, who are suffering from lung disease due to the smog released by the company CDA.

Answer 6

Chapter 25, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA.

To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In order to get relief from the court, the citizens need to provide evidence. The evidence can be provided in the form of an increased number of victims suffering from the lung disease. The harm caused to the people because of the emissions from the factories. Under the nuisance doctrine, to obtain relief from pollution, a property owner has to identify distinct harm from the rest of the people. The property owners are the victims in the above case, who are suffering from lung disease due to the smog released by the company CDA.

Answer 7

Chapter 25, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The local people of Lake Caliopa, Minnesota have noticed that a high number of people are suffering from a lung ailment. The lung ailment was almost four to seven times the rate compared with the national average. They found that the smog emitted by a company CDA on the outskirts of the town was responsible for the lung disease. The company CDA was directed to install a new equipment to control air and water pollution by the Minnesota pollution control agency. Later citizens sued the company CDA.

To find: The requirement which is identified by each plaintiff for getting relief from the court.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In order to get relief from the court, the citizens need to provide evidence. The evidence can be provided in the form of an increased number of victims suffering from the lung disease. The harm caused to the people because of the emissions from the factories. Under the nuisance doctrine, to obtain relief from pollution, a property owner has to identify distinct harm from the rest of the people. The property owners are the victims in the above case, who are suffering from lung disease due to the smog released by the company CDA.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 25 - Prob. 1RE Ch. 25 - Prob. 2RE Ch. 25 - Prob. 3RE Ch. 25 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 25 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 25 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 25 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 25 - Prob. 2BS Ch. 25 - Prob. 3BCP Ch. 25 - Superfund. A by-product of phosphate fertilizer...

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 25 Solutions