EBK FOUNDATIONS OF ECONOMICS
8th Edition
ISBN: 8220103632225
Author: PARKIN
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 25, Problem 9IAPA
To determine
To explain:
The missing elements that many wonderful technologies of today fail to bring faster
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Consider the following table displaying annual growth rates for nations X, Y, and Z, each of which entered 2020 with real
per capita GDP equal to $20,000.
Country
X
Y
Z
2020
7
4
5
Annual Growth Rate (%)
2021
1
5
4
2022
3
7
3
2023
492
a. The nation that most likely experienced a sizable earthquake in late 2020 that destroyed a significant portion of its
stock of capital goods, but was followed by speedy investments in rebuilding the nation's capital stock, is Y
Calculate this nation's per capita real GDP at the end of 2023. $
(Enter your response rounded to the nearest dollar.)
Consider the following table displaying annual growth rates for nations X, Y, and Z, each of which entered 2020 with real per capita GDP equal to $20,000. Annual Growth Rate (%) Country 2020 2021 2022 2023 X 7 1 3 4 Y 4 5 7 9 Z 5 4 3 2 Part 2 a. The nation that most likely experienced a sizable earthquake. in late 2020 that destroyed a significant portion of its stock of capital goods, but was followed by speedy investments in rebuilding the nation's capital stock, is X . Calculate this nation's per capita real GDP at the end of 2023. $2000020000. (Enter your response rounded to the nearest dollar.)
QUESTION 37
ROBOTS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
a
10
b
20
C
30
40
50
BEFR
37. Assuming robots represents capital goods and beer consumer goods, and the growth path of country 1 is from point (a) to (b) to (c), while country 2 goes from points (d) to (e) to (f), what can you
conclude about these countries?
a) Country 1 has a higher savings rate
b) Country 2 starts out with a higher standard of living
c) Country 2 has a higher rate of growth
d) Both (a) and (b) are correct
e) None of the above
Chapter 25 Solutions
EBK FOUNDATIONS OF ECONOMICS
Ch. 25 - Prob. 1SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 2SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 3SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 4SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 5SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 6SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 7SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 8SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 9SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 10SPPA
Ch. 25 - Prob. 11SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 12SPPACh. 25 - Prob. 1IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 2IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 3IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 4IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 5IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 6IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 7IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 8IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 9IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 10IAPACh. 25 - Prob. 1MCQCh. 25 - Prob. 2MCQCh. 25 - Prob. 3MCQCh. 25 - Prob. 4MCQCh. 25 - Prob. 5MCQCh. 25 - Prob. 6MCQCh. 25 - Prob. 7MCQCh. 25 - Prob. 8MCQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Over the past 50 years, many countries have experienced an annual growth rate in real GDP per capita greater than that of the United States. Some examples are China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Does that mean the United States is regressing relative to other countries? Does that mean these countries will eventually overtake the United States in terms of the growth rate of real GDP per capita? Explain.arrow_forward1. According to the Penn World Tables, Real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (2005 PPP Dollars), are given for South Korea and Mexico in the years 1975 and 2009 as below. South Korea Mexico GDP per capita in 1975 4,018.67 7,662.34 GDP per capita in 2009 25,033.62 11,628.87 a. What is the compounded average annual rate of growth for South Korea between 1975 and 2009? b. What is the compounded average annual rate of growth for Mexico between 1975 and 2009? c. Notice that in 1975 South Korea was poorer than Mexico, but by 2009 South Korea was richer than Mexico. Assuming constant growth rates over this period for both countries, as calculated in parts (a) & (b) above, in what year did South Korea overtake Mexico? t 50 ot .13arrow_forward5. The real GDP per capita in Colombia was $3,692 in 2000 and $5,889 in 2020. What is the average annual growth rate of the real GDP per capita from 2000 to 2020? Please use the log formula.arrow_forward
- 31. Assuming robots represents capital goods and beer consumer goods, and the growth path of country 1 is from point (a) to (b) to (c), while country 2 goes from points (d) to (e) to (f), what can you conclude about these countries? a) Country 1 has a higher savings rate b) Country 2 starts out with a higher standard of living c) Country 2 has a higher rate of growth d) Both (a) and (b) are correct e) None of the abovearrow_forwardEconomic Growth – End of Chapter Problem One analyst predicts that self-driving cars will ultimately reduce the number of cars that are produced. She argues that because self-driving cars can drive other people rather than sitting in people's driveways and garages, the United States will need to produce fewer cars. She argues that growth will slow because we are producing a decreasing number of cars each year. Do you agree? Why or why not? Producing fewer cars, everything else equal, will economic growth. However, the resources no longer used to produce cars be used to produce other items. Furthermore, the self-driving cars could opportunities for new businesses, which would have the effect. Therefore, the ultimate impact self-driving cars would have on economic growth isarrow_forward1. Growth experiences Small differences in the rate of economic growth can lead to large differences in living standards. Consider two countries: Upper Richistan and Lower Richistan. Currently, real GDP per person (average income) is $55,000 in Upper Richistan and $13,750 in Lower Richistan. Suppose you want to project what the real GDP per person will be in each country 100 years from now. The following formula shows how to compute the average income in ʼn years, where g represents the growth rate of real GDP per person (in decimal form-that is, 1.2% is entered as 0.012): Average Income in n Years = Current Average Income × (1 + g)' n Use the growth formula to find the correct amounts to select to fill in the following table. Growth Rate Average Income after 100 Years (Percent) (Dollars) 1.2 1.6 4 4.3 Suppose Upper Richistan's growth rate is expected to grow at 1.2% and remain there for the next 100 years. Which of the following growth rates in Lower Richistan would cause the average…arrow_forward
- I am having a problem with these four problems webdav/pid-1221589-dt-content-rid-8618514_1/courses/1678.201780/Assign2.pdf + Automatic Zoom : 19. Technological progress helps increase the productivity of labor, defined as the number of units of output produced per hour of labor. A rise in the productivity of labor in the production process, ceteris paribus, will cause A) the demand for the output to increase. B) the demand for the output to decrease. C) the supply of the output to increase. D) the supply of the output to decrease. E) None of the above is correct. Q Search 20. An economic recession with a decline in household incomes will negatively impact all retail businesses. A) True B) False 21. If we assume that the current equilibrium wage for low-skilled labor is $8 per hour and the minimum wage is increased from $5.75 to $7.25 per hour, then A) unemployment among low-skilled workers will increase. B) unemployment among low-skilled workers will remain unaffected. C) unemployment…arrow_forwardSuppose that India is currently growing at a rate of 14% per year and is producing real GDP per capita equal to $7,000, whereas the United States is currently growing at a rate of 5% per year and is producing real GDP per capita equal to $28,000.a) How long will it take India to double its real GDP per capita?b) How long will it take the United States to double its real GDP per capita?c) How much will India's real GDP per capita be in 20 years?d) How much will the USA's real GDP per capita be in 14 years?arrow_forwardHypothetical data is given for the following countries. Calculate real growth per capita in the following countries: Instructions: Enter your responses rounded to one decimal place. If you are entering a negative number, be sure to include a negative sign (-) in front of the number. a. Democratic Republic of Congo: population growth = 2.8 percent; real output growth=-1.6 percent. Real growth per capita: % b. Estonia: population growth-(0.6) percent; real output growth-4.5 percent. Real growth per capita:[ % c. India: population growth=1.7 percent; real output growth = 5.9 percent. Real growth per capita: [ % d. United States: population growth 0.7 percent; real output growth = 2.8 percent. Real growth per capita: [arrow_forward
- 3. Productivity and growth policies Consider a hypothetical small island nation in which the only industry is publishing. The following table displays information about the economy over a two year period. Complete the table by calculating physical capital per worker as well as labor productivity. Hint: Recall that productivity is defined as the amount of goods and services a worker can produce per hour. In this problem, measure productivity as the quantity of goods per hour of labor. Year 2046 2047 Physical Capital (Printing presses) 160 180 Based on your calculations, productivity from 2046 to 2047. Labor Force Physical Capital per Worker (Workers) (Printing presses) 40 60 Labor Hours Suppose you're in charge of establishing economic policy for this small island country. Imposing a tax on printing presses (Hours) 1,800 3,900 Output (Books) 14,400 23,400 in physical capital per worker from 2046 to 2047 is associated with Which of the following policies would lead to greater…arrow_forward24. Explain the impact that growth rates have on countries, both rich and poor, over time. Select three countries from Exhibit 3 and calculate to a tenth of a year how many years it will take their economies to double, assuming their growth rates remain constant. Section 12.1 exhibit 3 Real per Capita GDP (Selected Countries, 1997-2016) COUNTRY AVERAGE ANNUAL % GROWTH China 8.55 India 5.35 Bangladesh 4.15 Indonesia 2.64 Pakistan 1.76 Canada 1.44 United Kingdom 1.43 United States 1.38 Germany 1.33 Spain 1.31 Mexico 1.23 Argentina 1.22 Brazil 1.16 France 0.99 Japan 0.69 Italy 0.15 BOURCE Wond Bankarrow_forward11. The table below shows the average income per person in two countries in 1900 and their subsequent growth rates. Country Argentina Growth rate from 1900 to 2010 Income per person in 1900 $2756 $2758 1.03% Canada 2.19% The growth rates are only slightly different so maybe we should expect that they end up with similar, but not identical final incomes but they didn't. What was the absolute value of the difference in their incomes per person in 2010?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax