Review Question 26.1 Why is the historical role of the Michelson-Morley experiment that of a testing experiment, not an observational experiment?
The reason that Michelson-Morley experiment is a testing experiment rather than an observational experiment.
Answer to Problem 1RQ
Solution:
Michelson-Morley experiment is a testing experiment because the concept of ether was just a theory and not an experiment based result.
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
Michelson-Morley experiment was performed to check the existence of ether.
Explanation:
At the time of Michelson-Morley experiment it was required to have a material medium to travel through the waves. For example, ocean waves through water, a sound wave needs air.
The role of the medium is to transfer the disturbance produced by a source from one location to the other.
Considering the fact that light is also a wave, so the physicist thought that light also requires a medium to travel and called it ether.
In order to check the existence of ether, Michelson-Morley experiment was performed. But the experimental results did not match the thoughts of the physicists.
Conclusion:
The Michelson-Morley experiment was based on the thought of the existence of ether and it was not observational. Hence, the Michelson-Morley experiment was a testing experiment.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 26 Solutions
Modified Mastering Physics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for College Physics: Explore and Apply (18-Weeks)
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Conceptual Integrated Science
Physics: Principles with Applications
University Physics Volume 2
Essential University Physics: Volume 1 (3rd Edition)
An Introduction to Thermal Physics
- Choose the option from each pair that makes the following statement correct. According to an observer at rest, moving clocks run more [(a) slowly; (b) quickly] than stationary clocks and moving rods are [ (c) longer; (d) shorter] than stationary rods.arrow_forwardIn a laboratory frame of reference, an observer notes that Newtons second law is valid. Assume forces and masses are measured to be the same in any reference frame for speeds small compared with the speed of light. (a) Show that Newtons second law is also valid for an observer moving at a constant speed, small compared with the speed of light, relative to the laboratory frame. (b) Show that Newtons second law is not valid in a reference frame moving past the laboratory frame with a constant acceleration.arrow_forwardChoose the option that makes the following statement correct. An objects proper length is measured by an observer [(a) who measures the length of the moving object as it passes; (b) who is at rest relative to the object.]arrow_forward
- Speed of light in a moving medium. The motion of a medium such as water influences the speed of light. This effect was first observed by Fizeau in 1851. Consider a light beam passing through a horizontal column of water moving with a speed v. (a) Show that if the beam travels in the same direction as the flow of water, the speed of light measured in the laboratory frame is given by where n is the index of refraction of the water. (Hint: Use the inverse Lorentz velocity transformation and note that the speed of light with respect to the moving frame is given by c/n.) (b) Show that for v << c, the preceding expression is in good agreement with Fizeau’s experimental result: This proves that the Lorentz velocity transformation and not the Galilean velocity transformation is correct for light.arrow_forwardA physics professor on the Earth gives an exam to her students, who are in a spacecraft traveling at speed v relative to the Earth. The moment the craft passes the professor, she signals the start of the exam. She wishes her students to have a time interval T0 (spacecraft time) to complete the exam. Show that she should wait a time interval (Earth time) of T=T01/c1+/c before sending a light signal telling them to stop. (Suggestion: Remember that it takes some time for the second light signal to travel from the professor to the students.)arrow_forwardUnreasonable Results (a) Find the value of for the following situation. An astronaut measures the length of her spaceship to be 25.0 m, while an Earth-bound observer measures it to be 100 m. (b) What is unreasonable about this result? (c) Which assumptions are unreasonable or inconsistent?arrow_forward
- Construct Your Own Problem Consider an astronaut traveling to another star at a relativistic velocity. Construct a problem in which you calculate the time for the trip as observed on the Earth and as observed by the astronaut. Also calculate the amount of mass that must be converted to energy to get the astronaut and ship to the velocity travelled. Among the things to be considered are the distance to the star, the velocity, and the mass of the astronaut and ship. Unless your instructor directs you otherwise, do not include any energy given to other masses, such as rocket propellants.arrow_forwardAn astronaut wishes to visit the Andromeda galaxy, making a one-way trip that will take 30.0 years in the space-ships frame of reference. Assume the galaxy is 2.00 million light-years away and his speed is constant. (a) How fast must he travel relative to Earth? (b) What will be the kinetic energy of his spacecraft, which has mass of 1.00 106 kg? (c) What is the cost of this energy if it is purchased at a typical consumer price for electric energy, 13.0 cents per kWh? The following approximation will prove useful: 11+x1x2forx1arrow_forwardIn a lab frame of reference, an observer finds Newton’s second law is valid in the form. Show that Newton’s second law is not valid in a reference frame moving past the laboratory frame of Problem 1 with a constant acceleration a1. Assume that mass is an invariant quantity and is constant in time.arrow_forward
- Unreasonable Results A spaceship is heading directly toward the Earth at a velocity of 0.800c. The astronaut on board claims that he can send a canister toward the Earth at 1.20c relative to the Earth. (a) Calculate the velocity the canister must have relative to the spaceship. (b) What is unreasonable about this result? (c) Which assumptions are unreasonable or inconsistent?arrow_forward(a) Find the kinetic energy of a 78.0-kg spacecraft launched out of the solar system with speed 106 km/s by using the classical equation K=12mu2. (b) What If? Calculate its kinetic energy using the relativistic equation. (c) Explain the result of comparing the answers of parts (a) and (b).arrow_forwardAn interstellar space probe is launched from Earth. After a brief period of acceleration, it moves with a constant velocity, 70.0% of the speed of light. Its nuclear-powered batteries supply the energy to keep its data transmitter active continuously. The batteries have a lifetime of 15.0 years as measured in a rest frame. (a) How long do the batteries on the space probe last as measured by mission control on Earth? (b) How far is the probe from Earth when its batteries fail as measured by mission control? (c) How far is the probe from Earth as measured by its built-in trip odometer when its batteries fail? (d) For what total time after launch are data received from the probe by mission control? Note dial radio waves travel at the speed of light and fill the space between the probe and Earth at the time the battery fails.arrow_forward
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax CollegeCollege PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781285737027Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage LearningCollege PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...PhysicsISBN:9781337553292Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning