Case synopsis: Company B has been planning from the past 6 months to merge with Company H. After few discussions, it has decided to make a cash offer of $250 million for Company H. Person B, the financial officer of Company B, has been involved in the negotiations of merger. He has prepared a pro forma financial statements for Company H assuming that the merger will take place. If Company B purchases Company H, then there will be an immediate payment of dividend. Person B has identified the interest rate of borrowing for both the companies. Characters in the case: Company B Company H Person B Adequate information: Both the companies that are planning to merge have niche markets in the industry of golf club. To calculate : The exchange ratio that will make the merger equal to the price of $31.25 per share.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 3M

Summary Introduction

Case synopsis:

Company B has been planning from the past 6 months to merge with Company H. After few discussions, it has decided to make a cash offer of $250 million for Company H. Person B, the financial officer of Company B, has been involved in the negotiations of merger.

He has prepared a pro forma financial statements for Company H assuming that the merger will take place. If Company B purchases Company H, then there will be an immediate payment of dividend. Person B has identified the interest rate of borrowing for both the companies.

Characters in the case:

Company B

Company H

Person B

Adequate information:

Both the companies that are planning to merge have niche markets in the industry of golf club.

To calculate: The exchange ratio that will make the merger equal to the price of $31.25 per share.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Two large, publicly owned firms are contemplating a merger. No operating synergy isexpected. However, because returns on the two firms are not perfectly positively correlated,the standard deviation of earnings would be reduced for the combined corporation. Onegroup of consultants argues that this risk reduction is sufficient grounds for the merger.Another group thinks that this type of risk reduction is irrelevant because stockholders canhold the stock of both companies and thus gain the risk-reduction benefits without all thehassles and expenses of the merger. Whose position is correct? Explain.

Do solve it as soon as possible Identify which statement is not correct. In a takeover bid to acquire a part or all shares in another company: Select one: a. Friendly merger reduces the chance of overpaying for target’s shares. b. Successful acquirer is likely to pay more for target’s shares in scenarios that include multiple rival bidders. c. Target company management would not accept an offer where the consideration for target’s shares exceeds the NPV of the merger. d. Hostile takeover may result in overpaying for target’s shares.

Describe some of the positives and negatives from the point of view of both the acquirer and the target in a merger. What is the usual impact on the stock prices of each?