Two persons J and L hired a contractor to build a house. After the construction was completed, it was found that the roof was 7ft higher than the limit. The officer directed to remove the exceeding height. The board granted the variance as the hardship was created due to the fault of the contractor. Neighbors appealed to the court stating that the hardship was self-created. The court passed the decision in favor of the neighbors. To find: The judgement of the court.

Question

The city of Papagos, Arizona, had a deteriorating bridge in need of repair on a prominent public roadway. The cityposted notices seeking proposals for an artistic bridge design and reconstruction. Davidson Masonry, LLC, which wasowned and managed by Carl Davidson and his wife, Marilyn Rowe, decided to submit a bid to create a decorative concrete structure that incorporated artistic metalwork. They contacted Shana Lafayette, a local sculptor who specializedin large-scale metal creations, to help them design the bridge. The city selected their bridge design and awarded themthe contract for a commission of $184,000.Davidson Masonry and Lafayette then entered into an agreement to work together on the bridge project. DavidsonMasonry agreed to install and pay for concrete and structural work, and Lafayette agreed to install the metalwork ather expense. They agreed that overall profits would be split, with 25 percent going to Lafayette and 75 percent going toDavidson Masonry. Lafayette…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 4BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Two persons J and L hired a contractor to build a house. After the construction was completed, it was found that the roof was 7ft higher than the limit. The officer directed to remove the exceeding height. The board granted the variance as the hardship was created due to the fault of the contractor. Neighbors appealed to the court stating that the hardship was self-created. The court passed the decision in favor of the neighbors.

To find: The judgement of the court.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Two persons J and L hired a contractor to build a home. After the construction was completed, it was found that the roof was 7ft higher than the limit. The officer directed to remove the exceeding height. The board granted the variance as the hardship was created due to the fault of the contractor. Neighbors appealed to the court stating that the hardship was self-created. The court passed the decision in favor of the neighbors.

To find: Legitimate grounds for granting a variance.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

The city of Papagos, Arizona, had a deteriorating bridge in need of repair on a prominent public roadway. The cityposted notices seeking proposals for an artistic bridge design and reconstruction. Davidson Masonry, LLC, which wasowned and managed by Carl Davidson and his wife, Marilyn Rowe, decided to submit a bid to create a decorative concrete structure that incorporated artistic metalwork. They contacted Shana Lafayette, a local sculptor who specializedin large-scale metal creations, to help them design the bridge. The city selected their bridge design and awarded themthe contract for a commission of $184,000.Davidson Masonry and Lafayette then entered into an agreement to work together on the bridge project. DavidsonMasonry agreed to install and pay for concrete and structural work, and Lafayette agreed to install the metalwork ather expense. They agreed that overall profits would be split, with 25 percent going to Lafayette and 75 percent going toDavidson Masonry. Lafayette…

Ellen, a citizen of California, was seriously injured in an automobile accident while driving in California. She was injured due to the negligence of Sara, a citizen of Arizona, who ran a red light at an intersection. Ellen is seeking 1.5 million in damages. 1. Where may Ellen bring her suit? 2. Discuss the process Ellen would have to follow in order to fully litigate her claim. 3. If Sara is granted summary judgment at the trial court level, what may Ellen do next? Explain her options.

a) Miriam went to do shopping at Bei Poa Supermarket Ltd. However, due to the slippery floor at the supermarket, she slipped and fell injuring her limbs. Miriam is aggrieved and seeks compensation from Bei Poa Supermarket Ltd., but the supermarket denies liability. Identify the applicable legal principles and advise Miriam. b) Discuss ways through which the supremacy of the Constitution of Kenya is manifested