Case s ummary :Company ICANN is a non-profit organization that is involved in internet business. The most important function of ICANN is authorizing the registry for certain top-level domains (TLDs). An agreement was signed between ICANN and company VS that authorized company VS to serve as a registrar for the ‘.com’ as per ICANN’s specification and guidelines. VS although not being satisfied with the terms of the agreement, signed the agreement. VS accused ICANN of violating Section 1 of the Sherman Act as ICANN restricted various services it can be made available as a registrar.
To f ind: The view that will be considered for the action of company ICANN.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 27 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
- Unlike patents and trademarks, that are administered by the USPTO, copyrights are administered by the Library of Congress. However, like patents and trademarks, a copyright gives its creator the exclusive right to his or her original work for a limited time. Copyrights are a form of intellectual property protection that give a creator: Responsesarrow_forwardThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC) files suit against Yange Corp. under § 2 of the Sherman Act. To be successful, the FTC must prove that Yange Corp. possesses monopoly power in the relevant market and that the monopoly power was obtained by illegal means. The FTC has no direct evidence that Yange is using its power to control prices and restrict output. The FTC, therefore, must show that Yange Corp. has monopoly power indirectly, by showing that Yange Corp. has a dominant share of the relevant market and that there are significant barriers for new competitors entering that market. The FTC can calculate the market share that Yange Corp. has by: showing the total sales that Yange Corp. has ever had. × showing the net revenue that Yange Corp. had during their year of highest profits. looking at the company's sales compared against the total sales of the industry within a specific period. taking the total sales of the industry over one year, and comparing against industry sales over prior…arrow_forwardWhich of the following regulations mandates that mortgage loan originators (MOS) are required to inform a consumer of their right to opt out from a lender disciosing nonpublic personal information about the consur to a nonaffiliated third party? A) Gramm Leach Bliley Act B) Truth in Lending Act (TILA) C) Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) D) Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)arrow_forward
- Your former accounting professor recently contacted you because she knows that you currently work for an accounting firm that performs compilation services for several privately held mining companies. The professor requested data concerning whether your firm’s clients capitalize or expense certain environmental clean-up costs. Your clients discuss their accounting policies openly with you, but do not disclose these policies to outsiders. Your professor has agreed in writing to keep your clients’ accounting policies confidential. Because the professor is a member of the AICPA, and she will not achieve any financial gain, you may disclose the requested information to the professor. Select one: True Falsearrow_forwardCongratulations on your appointment as the Legal and Regulatory Compliance Officer for Intercorp Ltd, a provincially regulated corporation with head offices in Toronto, Ontario. As you settle into your new office, your assistant tells you that there are is a problematic file on your desk that you might want to look through sooner rather than later. Your CEO has asked you for a memo outlining any legal issues this file contains, together with your recommendations for how to proceed. You discover that Intercorp has some issues with special metal tubing that it had shipped by air carrier from England to their Ontario warehouse. It has been reported that there was significant turbulence during the transport of the goods in the air. Intercorp had ordered ten (10) tubes at $50,000 per tube, packed in 5 containers - 2 tubes to a container. Each tube weighed 10,000 kg. They arrived 30 days ago at the air cargo terminal; from there they were loaded onto a rail car. Unfortunately, due to a…arrow_forwardand in some instances, located in remote areas. Due to their remote locations and small staffs, some offices do not have a compliance officer, and brokers working in these offices have sometimes had to take on the responsibility of hiring the branch manager. Some brokers work out of their homes and use their own personal e-mail to contact clients. Some branches only keep records in electronic form for six years. Which of the following is not a breach of the Code regarding Eagle Asset Managers? 1. Having the brokers in a remote office hire the branch manager. 2. Keeping records in electronic form for six years. 3. Communicating with clients via personal e-mail. 4. Not having a compliance officer. (Ctrl)arrow_forward
- Franchising is a method of distributing products or services involving a franchisorthat establishes the brand's trademark, trade name, business system, and afranchisee who pays a royalty and an initial fee for the right to do business underthe franchisor's name and system. It is a contractual business relationship. Whatdo you think is the prime advantage and disadvantage in having a business ofthis nature?arrow_forward82 Upon receipt of commission earned from a closed purchase loan, the mortgage loan originator sends the realtor a bottle of wine and a gift card to a local restaurant which of the the following regulations does this action violate? A) Violation of the Fair Housing Act B) Violation of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) C) Violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) D) Violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)arrow_forwardSuture Express was a new upstart specializing in the medical supply network by selling only sutures. Owens & Minor was a medical supply distributor that carried all types of medical supplies, including sutures. Owens & Minor began bundling provisions that required its customers to pay a premium for all medical products unless the customer agreed to purchase its sutures. Suture Express brought suit alleging a loss to Owens & Minor through anticompetitive practices. Is this a tying situation that violates federal antitrust laws? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Examine the following situation: Register.com alleges that Verio had violated the terms of use of Register.com's WHOIS database. Verio understands that the terms are not binding, as users may access the database with or without manifestation of express consent to the terms of use. On the other hand, Register.com points out that Verio cannot argue that it has not consented to its terms of use, since they are clearly published on its website. At the end of the terms, it states that “by making this inquiry, you agree to comply with these terms.” Verio does not claim that it was unaware of these terms, but rather that you are not prompted to click on an icon indicating your acceptance of the terms.arrow_forwardExamine the following situation: Register.com alleges that Verio had violated the terms of use of Register.com's WHOIS database. Verio understands that the terms are not binding, as users may access the database with or without manifestation of express consent to the terms of use. On the other hand, Register.com points out that Verio cannot argue that it has not consented to its terms of use, since they are clearly published on its website. At the end of the terms, it states that “by making this inquiry, you agree to comply with these terms.” Verio does not claim that it was unaware of these terms, but rather that you are not prompted to click on an icon indicating your acceptance of the terms. After examining the situation, answer the following questions: Is this an example of a shrinkwrap or a clickwrap?Did the users of the licenses consent to the terms of the licenses? Support your answer.Were the parties contractually bound? Can they go to court in case of non-compliance with the…arrow_forward38) A franchise agreement is a contract between an entrepreneur, the -- and a parent company, the in which the entrepreneur agrees to pay the parent company for use of its trademarks, products, formulas and business practices. franchisee/franchiser borrower/lender investor/investee franchiser/franchiseearrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education