Case summary:
Person J suffered personal injuries with a tire manufactured by Company U. His father purchased the automobile from a dealer in State I. The tire was sold in Country B to Company G and subsequently installed on Company O when it was assembled in Company G plant in Country B.
Company O delivered automobiles to State I during those years ranging from 3,235 to 6,630. Person C brought suit in State I against Company U to recover for damages for his personal injuries. Company U declared that, the case was not subjected to jurisdiction of State I courts because the company was not registered to do business in that state and it never had an agent and it never sold or shipped products into State I.
To discuss: The arguments that Person J could make for support of his claim that State I courts have the jurisdiction over Company U.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 3 Solutions
BUSINESS LAW (LOOSE)-W/ACCESS >CUSTOM<
- On March 17, Peckham bought a new car from Larsen Chevrolet for $16,400. During the first one and one-half months after the purchase, Peckham discovered that the car’s hood was dented, its gas tank contained no baffles, its emergency brake was inoperable, the car did not have a jack or a spare tire, and neither the clock nor the speedometer worked. Larsen claimed that Peckham knew of the defects at the time of the purchase. Peckham, on the other hand, claimed that he did not know the extent of the defects and that despite his repeated efforts the defects were not repaired until June 11. Then, on July 15, the car’s dashboard caught fire, leaving the car’s interior damaged and the car itself inoperable. Peckham then returned to Larsen Chevrolet and told Larsen that he had to repair the car at his own expense or that he, Peckham, would either rescind the contract or demand a new automobile. Peckham also claimed that at the end of their conversation he notified Larsen Chevrolet that he was…arrow_forwardRobert sold used cars, but he had little or no knowledge with respect to the technical aspects of any of the vehicles that he sold. Ray was seeking to buy a Honda Civic and Robert gave his opinion as to the speed of the car and its durability. Ray subsequently finalized the purchase and took control of the car. Two weeks after the purchase, the Honda Civic broke down and required extensive mechanical repairs. Ray is angry and is of the view that Robert misrepresented the condition of the car when he sold it. Ray is of the opinion that as a Used Car Salesmen, Robert should have known that the car was indeed in poor mechanical condition. Please advise Ray using the IRAC methodarrow_forwardRobert sold used cars, but he had little or no knowledge with respect to the technical aspects of any of the vehicles that he sold. Ray was seeking to buy a Honda Civic and Robert gave his opinion as to the speed of the car and its durability. Ray subsequently finalized the purchase and took control of the car. Two weeks after the purchase, the Honda Civic broke down and required extensive mechanical repairs. Ray is angry and is of the view that Robert misrepresented the condition of the car when he sold it. Ray is of the opinion that as a Used Car Salesmen, Robert should have known that the car was indeed in poor mechanical condition. Ray knows that you are studying Business Law at UWI Open Campus and sought your advice on the matter. Please advise Ray.arrow_forward
- Robert sold used cars, but he had little or no knowledge with respect to the technical aspects of any of the vehicles that he sold. Ray was seeking to buy a Honda Civic and Robert gave his opinion as to the speed of the car and its durability. Ray subsequently finalized the purchase and took control of the car. Two weeks after the purchase, the Honda Civic broke down and required extensive mechanical repairs. Ray is angry and is of the view that Robert misrepresented the condition of the car when he sold it. Ray is of the opinion that as a Used Car Salesmen, Robert should have known that the car was indeed in poor mechanical condition. Ray knows that you are studying Business, and sought your advice on the matter. Please advise Ray.arrow_forwardHarriet went to Maurice’s computer shop for the first time and left her expensive laptop computer to be cleaned and upgraded. The shop was burgled, despite Maurice’s extensive security measures. Maurice is a sole trader and does not have any insurance to cover the theft. He draws Harriet’s attention to a small sign in a dimly lit corner of the shop which says ‘No liability accepted’ and to an exclusion clause printed in small letters on the back of the receipt for the laptop. It states, in legal terms copied from the internet, that he will not be liable for loss or damage to goods left for service or repair under any circumstances. Discuss, giving your reasons, if Harriet will succeed in gaining compensation from Maurice for the lost laptop. (Examine legal concepts and scope of contract law).arrow_forwardRobert sold used cars, but he had little or no knowledge with respect to technical aspects of any of the vehicles that he sold. Ray was seeking to buy a Honda Civic and Robert gave his opinion as to the speed of the car and its durability. Ray subsequently finalized the purchase and took control of the car. Two weeks after the purchase, the Honda Civic broke down and required extensive mechanical repairs. Ray is angry and is of the view that Robert misrepresented the condition of the car when he sold it. Ray is of the opinion that as a used car Salesman, Robert should have known that the car was indeed in poor mechanical condition. Ray knows that you are studying Business law and sought your advice on the matter. please advice Ray.arrow_forward
- Using the IRAC model to answer the question. Jim and Jane got married last Sunday. The next day they travelled to Extended Stay Hotel in Miami for their honeymoon. They arrived at the Hotel, checked in and proceeded to their room. At the back of the front door in their room was a notice excluding liability, which read that “ Extended Stay will not be responsible for articles lost or stolen, unless it is logged at the front desk for safe custody.” However, this exclusion clause could only be seen after the door is closed as well as, the actual notice was small and colored in black, with a white background. Regrettably, with all the excitement of their honeymoon, both Jim and Jane did not even notice the exclusion clause at the back of the door. One day when they were out shopping, someone came into their room and stole Jim’s laptop.…arrow_forwardDanny sells his second-hand car to BB Auto Traders, a used car dealer. During the verbal negotiations the vehicle is described as a 2017 Civit Honda. After the sale, BB Auto Traders discovered that the car was in fact a 2015 Civit Honda. The registration document stated it was first registered in 2017 and when Danny sold the car, he relied on the information detailed both within the car log book and on the registration document, but it turned out that the logbook was forged by the previous owner and the registration document was inaccurate. Advise Danny on the legal issues that arise in contract law. In doing so, you should interpret the terms of contract, identifying if any terms have been breached and what remedies might arise Would your answer be different if the negotiations between Danny and BB Auto Traders were all undertaken via email? why explain properly.arrow_forwardLewis owned a second-hand car which he bought for RM35,000.00 in cash before the COVID19 outbreak. Due to a tight budget and to cover his credit card debts from his lavish lifestyle, Lewis decided to sell the car. Jimin expressed interest and offered RM15,000.00, which Lewis accepted. After Jimin paid RM15,000.00, he informed Lewis that he would pick up the car a week later. The following day, Lewis's colleague, Daniel, offered to purchase the car for RM25,000.00, which Lewis immediately accepted. He later contacted Jimin informing him that he had sold the car to Daniel and would return the RM15,000.00 paid by Jimin plus RM1500.00 as compensation. Jimin was enraged, insisting that the car belonged to him already, and he was the one who made the first bid and paid in full. Irritated by Jimin's responses, Lewis replied it was his right as the owner to choose the buyer and that he and Jimin had no legally binding contract. Furthermore, the price offered by Lewis was significantly lower…arrow_forward
- Mary, a keen pottery collector, saw a notice in the Daily News for an auction at James Pottery Limited on September 30th 2022. She traveled 300 kilometers to attend the auction in order to bid for a particularly rare item the “Mozart Pottery”, specifically mentioned in the list of items to be auctioned. However, when she got to the auction site, she found a notice stating that the auction had been canceled. Mary thereafter proceeded to a nearby antique shop and saw on display in the window, the identical “Mozart Pottery” priced at $10,000. Mary told the shop owner, Anthony, that she was only willing to pay $8,000 for it. However, Anthony indicated that he is willing to sell the pottery for $9,500. Mary then indicated to him that she desires some time to think it over and after lunch she will advise him. Anthony subsequently, agreed not to sell the identified pottery, until she return after lunch. However, Anthony forgot his promised to Mary and sold it to John for $9,500 before…arrow_forwardMary, a keen pottery collector, saw a notice in the Daily News for an auction at James Pottery Limited on September 30th 2022. She traveled 300 kilometers to attend the auction in order to bid for a particularly rare item the “Mozart Pottery”, specifically mentioned in the list of items to be auctioned. However, when she got to the auction site, she found a notice stating that the auction had been canceled. Mary thereafter proceeded to a nearby antique shop and saw on display in the window, the identical “Mozart Pottery” priced at $10,000. Mary told the shop owner, Anthony, that she was only willing to pay $8,000 for it. However, Anthony indicated that he is willing to sell the pottery for $9,500. Mary then indicated to him that she desires some time to think it over and after lunch, she will advise him. Anthony subsequently, agreed not to sell the identified pottery, until she return after lunch. However, Anthony forgot his promised to Mary and sold it to John for $9,500 before…arrow_forwardMary, a keen pottery collector, saw a notice in the Daily News for an auction at James Pottery Limited on September 30th 2022. She traveled 300 kilometers to attend the auction in order to bid for a particularly rare item the “Mozart Pottery”, specifically mentioned in the list of items to be auctioned. However, when she got to the auction site, she found a notice stating that the auction had been canceled. Mary thereafter proceeded to a nearby antique shop and saw on display in the window, the identical “Mozart Pottery” priced at $10,000. Mary told the shop owner, Anthony, that she was only willing to pay $8,000 for it. However, Anthony indicated that he is willing to sell the pottery for $9,500. Mary then indicated to him that she desires some time to think it over and after lunch she will advise him. Anthony subsequently, agreed not to sell the identified pottery, until she return after lunch. However, Anthony forgot his promised to Mary and sold it to John for $9,500 before…arrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON