Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305224414
Author: JENNINGS
Publisher: Cengage
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
error_outline
This textbook solution is under construction.
Students have asked these similar questions
X bound himself to deliver to Y a 21-inch 2010 model TV-set, and the 13 cubic feet Gray Samsung refrigerator, with Motor No. SAM-123, which Y saw in X’s store, and to repair Y’s piano. X did none of these things.
May the court compel X to deliver the TV set and the refrigerator and repair the piano? Why? If not, what relief may the court grant Y? Why?
Assume that A values his house at $90,000. B is willing to pay $110,000 for A’s house in order torelocate closer to work. After signing a contract, B’s employer announces that the company will moveto another city. In view of this fact, the value of the house to B is reduced to $75,000. From anefficiency viewpoint, who should own the house, A or B?How will the parties achieve efficiency in allocating the house if the court enforces the contract?
1.] A entered into a verbal agreement with B whereby A will pay B 1 Million Pesos if the latter will burn the house of X. B succeeded in burning the house of X.
Q1. Is there a contract between and B? Explain your answer.
Q2. When B subsequently demanded payment from A, the latter refused to pay. Can B bring an action against A for non-fulfillment of his contractual obligation?
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Which of the following is not a possible limitation on the deduction of a personal casualty loss? The lesser of the fair market value of the property or the adjusted basis at the time of the loss A100 floor for each casualty event A10 percent of AGI floor for all casualty losses during the year A personal casualty not associated with a federally declared disaster All of the above are possible limitations on a personal casualty lossarrow_forwardVirginia has business property that is stolen and partially destroyed by the time it was recovered. She receives an insurance reimbursement of $5,000 on property that had a $14,000 basis and a decrease in market value of $10,000 due to damage caused by the theft. What is the amount of Virginia's casualty loss? a.$4,000 b.$5,000 c.$14,000 d.$10,000 e.None of these choices are correct.arrow_forwardC has initiated a lawsuit against Agency A for recovery of damages when accidentally one of the vehicles owned by the agency collided with the car then driven by C. The Chief Legal Counsel of the Agency estimates from experience that at December 2015, the entity has a 60% chance of winning the lawsuit and thereby avoiding the payment of damages. Furthermore, the counsel estimates that the agency has 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P100,000 and a 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P10,000. . State whether a contingent liability or contingent asset exists. Explain your answers by stating the criteria of your answers belowarrow_forward
- C has initiated a lawsuit against Agency A for recovery of damages when accidentally one of the vehicles owned by the agency collided with the car then driven by C. The Chief Legal Counsel of the Agency estimates from experience that at December 2015, the entity has a 60% chance of winning the lawsuit and thereby avoiding the payment of damages. Furthermore, the counsel estimates that the agency has 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P100,000 and a 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P10,00 Use the facts given in No. 1, but this time assumes that on December 31, 2015, the Chief Legal Counsel of Agency A estimates from past experience that the possibility of losing the case filed by C is remote. -State whether a contingent liability or contingent asset exists.-Explain your answers by stating the criteria of your answers below.arrow_forwardA buyer working with QRS Realty wants to make an offer on a property. To save time, the buyer makes a verbal offer of $210,000 and the seller agrees. The offer is: -invalid because it does not include a closing date-unenforceable because it is not in writing-voidable because the licensee did not review the offer-unilateral because the contract is not exclusivearrow_forwardSheila Company is engaged in the manufacture of chemicals which it exports to other countries. On December 25, 2021, one of its tanks in the production assembly plant exploded. Unfortunately one of its employees was caught by the accident and suffered severe burns all over his body. For damages sustained because of the explosion, the employee sued Sheila and claimed an amount totaling P10,000,000 for physical injuries sustained. The lawyers of Sheila expect that Sheila Company will probably lose the lawsuit and estimate that the company may have to pay an amount in the range of P5,000,000 to P8,000,000. On March 15, 2022, upon the advice of his lawyers, the injured employees offered to have an out of court settlement of P7,500,000. The offer was tendered on the same date and Sheila on the advice of its legal counsel accepted the said offer on March 20, 2022. Sheila’s financial statements for the year ended 2021 was issued on March 30, 2022. Sheila’s financial statements for the year…arrow_forward
- Irwin is a resident of Wyoming. He sold real estate located in North Carolina to Bethany, LLC, an Ohio-based company. Bethany failed to make payments on the loan. Which state's laws determine the foreclosure process for the property? (a) Ohio (b) North Carolina (c) Wyoming (d) No state, because the foreclosure process is controlled by federal law.arrow_forwardHusband and Wife are engaged in business of selling product X in Mindanao, where there are many terrorist groups operating in the business area. In 2018, they have a total business net income of 250,000. Decide. a. Need to file one ITR for 2018, unless impracticable b. NO need to file because they are exempted due to terrorist groups. c. File a separate ITR under Section 51 (D), unless impracticable d. File a consolidated return on May 15, 2019, under Sec 51 (D) e. None of the abovearrow_forwardThompson’s house was destroyed by fire and claims were filed with the insurance company. The insurance company (insurer) hired Cannon to investigate the fire as it was suspicious about the cause. Subsequently, the insurer denied the claims based on Cannon’s report. Thompson sued the insurer and Cannon. Thompson claimed to be a third party beneficiary of the Cannon-insurer contract. Is Thompson correct? If not, what type of beneficiary is he and why? arrow_forward
- D is indebted to C for P10,000. For the purpose of defrauding C, D sold his only parcel of land to X valued P10,000. X has no knowledge of the intention of D. a. The contract D and X is binding. b. The contract is voidable because S is in bad faith. c. The right of C is to rescind the contract because the transaction is fraudulent. d. The contract between D and X is rescissible.arrow_forwardA customer is suing Ephiyu Company for P550,000 in damages because her child was injured in November 2022 while riding an escalator that stopped suddenly in one of its state-of-the-art stores in Makati. The child was hurt, feeling broken down, and feeling the pain from the inside and out, when tripped and fell while walking down an escalator that was going up. Legal counsel feels that the child is partially at fault, and so deserves all the pain, but that it is probable that the lawsuit will be settled for between P250,000 and P550,000, with the following likely outcome: 30% to be settled at P250,000; 45% to be settled at P340.000 and 25% to be settled at P550,000. How much provision for damages shall be included in the liability section as of December 31, 2022?arrow_forwardAn employee sued Harrington Company in late 2023. General counsel concluded that there was an 80 percent probability that the company would lose the lawsuit. The range of loss is estimated to be $21,000 to $73,500, with no amount in the range more likely than any other. They settled the lawsuit in 2024, with Harrington making a payment of $63,000. Assume that Harrington Company is a U.S.-based company that is issuing securities to foreign investors who require financial statements prepared accordance with IFRS. Thus, adjustments to convert from U.S. GAAP to IFRS must be made. Ignore income taxes. Required: Prepare journal entries for this lawsuit for the years ending December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2024, under (1) U.S. GAAP and (2) IFRS. Prepare the entry(ies) that Harrington would make on the December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2024, conversion worksheets to convert U.S. GAAP balances to IFRS. Record the entry for the litigation liability as per U.S. GAAP. Note: Enter…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
- Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:9780357109731
Author:Hoffman
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Current assets and current liabilities; Author: The Finance Storyteller;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw4TaiP42P4;License: Standard youtube license