a.
To graph: The impact of an increase in transfer payments (which is financed through government borrowings) on equilibrium output.
b.
To explain: The impact of an increase in transfer payments on equilibrium output if the government will pay for the increase in transfer payments.
c.
To explain: The impact of an increase in transfer payments on equilibrium output, if a transfer policy increases taxes on those with a low propensity to consume to pay for transfer to people with a high propensity to consume.
d.
To explain: Whether tax cuts will be more effective at stimulating output when they are directed towards high income or toward low-income taxpayers.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 3 Solutions
Macroeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (7th Edition)
- What do economists mean when they say government purchases are “exhaustive” expenditures whereas government transfer payments are “nonexhaustive” expenditures? Cite an example of a government purchase and a government transfer payment.arrow_forwardSuppose that government spending was increased by 10 units and that this increase was financed by a 10-unit increase in taxes. Would equilibrium income change or remain the same as a result of these two policy actions? If equilibrium income changed, in which direction would it move, and by how much? Explainarrow_forwardIn Hofstralia, initially nobody is defaulting on their loan, and the government is running a balanced budget in every period. Joe is a borrower. Draw Joe’s intertemporal budget constraint, use an indifference curve to show his optimal consumption bundle, and place an endowment point (and show its coordinates) on his budget constraint consistent with the fact that he is a borrower. Suppose that the government is eliminates taxes in the current period, and finances its spending through a deficit. Show graphically how the tax cut would affect Joe’s borrowing, and explain what would happen to his consumption and welfare. Would the Ricardian equivalence hold? Why or why not? Suppose now that due to a recession people start losing their jobs. Banks expect some borrowers to default but because of asymmetric information, they do not know which ones. Explain how interest rate on loans would change and why. Show on the graph and explain how events in the financial market would affect Joe’s…arrow_forward
- In Hofstralia, initially nobody is defaulting on their loan, and the government is running a balanced budget in every period. Joe is a borrower. Draw Joe’s intertemporal budget constraint, use an indifference curve to show his optimal consumption bundle, and place an endowment point (and show its coordinates) on his budget constraint consistent with the fact that he is a borrower. Suppose that the government is eliminates taxes in the current period, and finances its spending through a deficit. Show graphically how the tax cut would affect Joe’s borrowing, and explain what would happen to his consumption and welfare. Would the Ricardian equivalence hold? Why or why not? Suppose now that due to a recession people start losing their jobs. Banks expect some borrowers to default but because of asymmetric information, they do not know which ones. Explain how interest rate on loans would change and why. Show on the graph and explain how events in the financial market would affect Joe’s…arrow_forwardSuppose that the following equations describe the 4-sector economyConsumption function C= 60 + 0.8 Yd,Investment function I= 100-5i,% interest rate i=6 (use 6 to compute for the investment),Government Expenditure G= 76,Lump sum Tax Tx= 15,Transfer payments TR=60,Exports X=70Imports M=20+0.2Y 5.1. Calculate the equilibrium level of income. At this level of income, is the economy operating with a budget surplus or budget deficit?5.2. Calculate the investment, government, tax, transfer payments and foreign trade multiplier.5.3. Suppose that government increases its education and health services by 65, what is the new level of income?5.4. If exports increase by 10, what is the new level of income? Is the economy operating with a trade deficit or surplus at this level of income?arrow_forwardSuppose in our two-period model of the economy that the government, instead of borrowing in the current period, runs a government loan program. That is, loans are made to consumers at the market real interest rate r, with the aggregate quantity of loans made in the current period denoted by L. Government loans are financed by lump-sum taxes on consumers in the current period, and we assume that government spending is zero in the current and future periods. In the future period, when the government loans are repaid by consumers, the government rebates this amount as lump-sum transfers (negative taxes) to consumers. We use the same notation as in the lecture notes (y, y′ , c, c′ ,t, t′ , s, T, T′ ). Also, we use l ≡ L/n to represent the size of the loan that each individual consumer takes from the loan program, where n is the population. 1) Write down the government’s current-period budget constraint and its future-period budget constraint. 2) Determine the present-value budget…arrow_forward
- Suppose that the MPS = 0.2 and the government is interested in raising the level of output in the economy by $100 billion. Calculate how much the government would have to spend to achieve this objective. Define the tax multiplier and give the algebraic expression. Assume that the government spending multiplier is equal to 4. Calculate the tax multiplier from this information. Calculate how much output would expand by if the government increased spending by $500 billion and financed this spending by increasing lump-sum taxes by the same amountarrow_forwardSome liken quantitative easing to that of directing a firehose of money to emerging economies that cannot manage the cash, while others worry that the flood of cash has encourages reckless financial behavior. What specific types of "reckless" financial behavior comes from quantitative easing and by whom? Which measure will reduce employment best: government tax reduction, or increased government spending? Can you compare the multiplier effect of a tax reduction versus the multiplier effect of an increase in government spending? There are TWO formulas. Which of the two will have a bigger impact in the economy and why based on the two formulas? Using the formulas, figure this out: If $30 billion in new investment is added to the economy and MPC is 0.9, how much would the national income (GDP) increase by?arrow_forwardAssume that, without taxes, the consumption schedule for an economy is as shown in the first two columns of the table below. Suppose that a lump-sum (regressive) tax of $10 billion is imposed at all levels of GDP. a. Calculate the tax rate at each level of GDP and enter the tax, disposable income, consumption, and tax rate in the table.Instructions: For the tax, disposable income, and consumption after tax, enter your answers as whole numbers. For the tax rate, round your answers to 2 decimal places.SEE PICTURE!!! b. Compare the MPC and the multiplier with those of the pretax consumption schedule. Instructions: For the MPC, round your answers to 1 decimal place. For the multiplier, enter your answers as whole numbers. SEE PICTURE!!!arrow_forward
- Suppose we start with a general equilibrium, and there is a decrease in the effective tax rate on capital. Which of the following statements correctly describes how the economy restores from the short-term equilibrium towards the long-term equilibrium? 1. Short-term output is smaller than full-employment level output and price rises 2. Short-term output is greater than full-employment level output and price rises 3. Short-term output is smaller than full-employment level output and price drops 4. Short-term output is greater than full-employment level output and price drops 5. None of the abovearrow_forwardSuppose the following data for an economy; a consumption function of C = 800 + 0.8Yd, Investment spending is fixed at 300, Government purchases are 400, and net taxes are 100. A.) What is the MPC, MPS, and the value of the tax multiplier? B.) Suppose government increases taxes by 100, use the corresponding multiplier to calculate the new equilibrium level of income. C.) Check to ensure that the multiplier worked (confirm algebraically that your answer in B is correct, that is, solve for the new equilibrium level of income (Y)).arrow_forwardSuppose that autonomous consumption (a) is 300, private investment spending (I) is 420, government spending (G) is 400 , Net taxes (T) are 400 and marginal propensity to consume (b) is 80 %, and marginal tax rate (t) is 25 % . By using the above information: a) Find the equilibrium value of national income and show it on a graph. b) Suppose that the potential income level is 2500 in the economy. In this case, what kind of fiscal policy you can use to reach the full employment level. (show this numerically and explain it on your graph) Thank you.arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning