MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Foundations of Economics
8th Edition
ISBN: 9780134518312
Author: Robin Bade, Michael Parkin
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 32, Problem 2IAPA
To determine
To explain:
The effect of increase in expenditure on the highways and bridges would have on aggregate demand and real
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Suppose that the U.S. government increases its expenditure on highways and bridges by $100 billion. Explain the effect that this expenditure would have on aggregate demand and real GDP.
Consider an economy that is operating below the full-employment level of real GDP. What would be the effect of an increase in government spending on aggregate demand and real GDP?
Examine the following policies and determine which would decrease the level of aggregate demand.
Decreasing in government spending and decreasing taxes
Increasing investment and increasing government spending
Increasing consumption and decreasing taxes
Decreasing in government spending and increasing in taxes
Chapter 32 Solutions
MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Foundations of Economics
Ch. 32 - Prob. 1SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 2SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 3SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 4SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 5SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 6SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 7SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 8SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 9SPPACh. 32 - Prob. 10SPPA
Ch. 32 - Prob. 1IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 2IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 3IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 4IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 5IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 6IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 7IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 8IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 9IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 10IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 11IAPACh. 32 - Prob. 1MCQCh. 32 - Prob. 2MCQCh. 32 - Prob. 3MCQCh. 32 - Prob. 4MCQCh. 32 - Prob. 5MCQCh. 32 - Prob. 6MCQCh. 32 - Prob. 7MCQCh. 32 - Prob. 8MCQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- You are given the following information about aggregate demand at the existing price level for an economy: (1) consumption = $500 billion, (2) investment = $50 billion, (3) government purchases = $100 billion, and (4) exports = $20 billion, imports = $40 billion. If the full-employment level of GDP for this economy is $700 billion. Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) of the economy is 0.5. How much government purchases would be closing the GDP-gap here? Explain your answer, and show your calculation.arrow_forwardThe economy is in a recession. The government enacts a policy to increase spending by $2 billion. The MPS is 0.25. What would be the full increase in real GDP from the change in government spending, assuming that the aggregate supply curve is horizontal across the range of GDP being considered? Multiple Choice $8 billion $2 billion $16 billion $4 billionarrow_forwardThis problem has been solved! See the answer Explain the relationship between the aggregate expenditures model in graph (A) below and the aggregate demand–aggregate supply model in graph (B) below. In other words, explain how points 1, 2, and 3 are related to points 1’, 2’, and 3’.arrow_forward
- Identify which expenditure category each of the following will directly impact, and also which direction the U.S. aggregate demand curve will shift as a result.a. Incomes increase abroad.b. Interest rates decrease.c. Congress passes a permanent tax cut.d. Firms become more optimistic about the outlook for the economy.e. Stocks traded on the NASDAQ market lose 40 percent of their value in one month's timearrow_forwardAn economist who claims that an increase in government spending would result mainly in a higher price level believes the economy is operating where the Group of answer choices aggregate supply curve is steep. MPC is small. aggregate supply curve is flat. MPC is large.arrow_forwardIn order to break stagflation, the government has to increase expenditure on food subsidies in the form of food vouchers, unemployment benefits or allowances, wages subsidy to increase household consumption expenditure and boost up the AD. With increased consumption expenditure, aggregate demand will rise, which would send a signal to the aggregate supply (AS) to raise production. This will create a positive effect, which will bring the economy out of recession. Show this in a graph.arrow_forward
- In February 2021, retail sales fell by 3.3% compared to January. What does the drop in retail sales indicate about how consumption has changed? Investment spending fell by 2.2% in February. How will these changes affect aggregate expenditures? How will equilibrium GDP be affected? How do you think the stimulus checks that many Americans will receive will affect consumption? How will that affect aggregate expenditures and GDP and employment? Do you expect the change in aggregate expenditures be temporary or permanent? Part of the stimulus package passed by Biden includes an extra $300 per week in unemployment benefits. Do you agree with the stimulus checks and additional $300 per week in unemployment benefits? Why or why not?arrow_forwardDifferentiate the macroeconomic effects that explain the causes of the differences of government spending in aggregate demand. Describe your answer.arrow_forwardIf the MPS in an economy is .4, government could shift the aggregate demand curve leftward by $50 billion by: reducing government expenditures by $125 billion. reducing government expenditures by $20 billion. increasing taxes by $50 billion. increasing taxes by $250 billion.arrow_forward
- If the government increases expenditures on goods and services and increases taxation by the same amount, which of the following will occur? A. Aggregate demand will be unchanged. B. Aggregate demand will increase. C. Interest rates will decrease. D. The money supply will decrease.arrow_forwardIn an effort to increase output in the short run due to the poor economy, government officials have decided to cut taxes. They are considering two possible temporary tax cuts of equal size in terms of lost revenue. The first would reduce the taxes on people with incomes above $100,000 per year. The second would cut taxes on people with incomes below $60,000 for one year. Which change would have a greater impact on aggregate spending (i.e shift the aggregate demand curve further to the right)? Why?arrow_forwardThe Australian government is concerned about the growing budget deficit, so they decide to cut government expenditures by $15 billion. They also decide the economy needs a boost so they decide to cut income taxes by $40 billion. Would this simply mean a net increase in aggregate demand of $25 billion? Why or why not?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you