Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337399944
Author: Michael A. Seeds
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 1LL
To determine
The reason why the building is not showing any parallax, whether it is an example for parallax, the method by which the parallax can be increased.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
1. Where would the north celestial pole be located in the sky if you stood at the North Pole?
A. 32.5 degrees above the northern horizon
B. directly at your northern horizon
C. 23.5 degrees above the northern horizon
D. 57.5 degrees above the northern horizon
E. directly over your head at your zenith
2. Where would the north celestial pole be located in the sky if you were standing in San Diego (San Diego’s latitude is 32.5 degrees above the equator?
A. 32.5 degrees above the northern horizon
B. directly at your northern horizon
C. 57.5 degrees above the northern horizon
D. directly over your head at your zenith
E. 23.5 degrees above the northern horizon
When you say "sub-word parallax," what do you mean?
For an observer located in the north pole, would the altitude of the stars in the east, increase, decrease, both, or stay the same?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 4 - Prob. 1RQCh. 4 - Prob. 2RQCh. 4 - Prob. 3RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4RQCh. 4 - Prob. 5RQCh. 4 - Prob. 6RQCh. 4 - Which two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional...Ch. 4 - Prob. 8RQCh. 4 - Prob. 9RQCh. 4 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11RQCh. 4 - Prob. 12RQCh. 4 - Prob. 13RQCh. 4 - Prob. 14RQCh. 4 - Assume the night is clear and the Moons phase is...Ch. 4 - Prob. 16RQCh. 4 - Prob. 17RQCh. 4 - Prob. 18RQCh. 4 - Prob. 19RQCh. 4 - Prob. 20RQCh. 4 - Prob. 21RQCh. 4 - Prob. 22RQCh. 4 - How did the Alfonsine Tables, the Prutenic Tables,...Ch. 4 - Prob. 24RQCh. 4 - Prob. 25RQCh. 4 - Prob. 26RQCh. 4 - Prob. 27RQCh. 4 - Draw and label a diagram of the western horizon...Ch. 4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4 - Prob. 7PCh. 4 - One planet is three times farther from the Sun...Ch. 4 - Prob. 9PCh. 4 - Prob. 10PCh. 4 - Prob. 11PCh. 4 - Prob. 1SPCh. 4 - Prob. 2SPCh. 4 - Prob. 1LLCh. 4 - Prob. 2LLCh. 4 - What three astronomical objects are represented...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4LL
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Suppose you are on a strange planet and observe, at night, that the stars do not rise and set, but circle parallel to the horizon. Next, you walk in a constant direction for 8000 miles, and at your new location on the planet, you find that all stars rise straight up in the east and set straight down in the west, perpendicular to the horizon. How could you determine the circumference of the planet without any further observations? What is the circumference, in miles, of the planet?arrow_forwardUrsa Minor contains the pole star, Polaris, and the asterism known as the Little Dipper. From most locations in the Northern Hemisphere, all of the stars in Ursa Minor are circumpolar. Does that mean these stars are also above the horizon during the day? Explain.arrow_forwardIf you go out to look at the night sky tonight from central Iowa, the North Star (aka Polaris) is located near the North Celestial Pole at an altitude of approximately 42 degrees above the horizon. Why is that the case? What is the altitude of the celestial equator at its highest point as viewed from this location and how do we calculate that? Explain the myth behind one of the constellations located near North Celestial Pole and then explain the myth behind another constellation along the ecliptic plane.arrow_forward
- Is there any place on Earth where all the visible stars are circumpolar? If so, where? Is there any place on Earth where none of the visible stars is circumpolar? If so, where? Explain your answers.arrow_forwardIs the ecliptic the same thing as the celestial equator? Explain.arrow_forwardThe north celestial pole appears at an altitude above the horizon that is equal to the observer’s latitude. Identify Polaris, the North Star, which lies very close to the north celestial pole. Measure its altitude. (This can be done with a protractor. Alternatively, your fist, extended at arm’s length, spans a distance approximately equal to 10°.) Compare this estimate with your latitude. (Note that this experiment cannot be performed easily in the Southern Hemisphere because Polaris itself is not visible in the south and no bright star is located near the south celestial pole.)arrow_forward
- Show with a simple diagram how the lower parts of a ship disappear first as it sails away from you on a spherical Earth. Use the same diagram to show why lookouts on old sailing ships could see farther from the masthead than from the deck. Would there be any advantage to posting lookouts on the mast if Earth were flat? (Note that these nautical arguments for a spherical Earth were quite familiar to Columbus and other mariners of his time.)arrow_forwardWhy does the number of circumpolar constellations depend on the latitude of the observer?arrow_forwardFrom where on Earth could you observe all of the stars during the course of a year? What fraction of the sky can be seen from the North Pole?arrow_forward
- The Sun is much closer to Earth than are the nearest stars, yet it is not possible to measure accurately the diurnal parallax of the Sun relative to the stars by measuring its position relative to background objects in the sky directly. Explain why.arrow_forwardParallaxes are measured in fractions of an arcsecond. One arcsecond equals 1/60 arcmin; an arcminute is, in turn, 1/60th of a degree (°). To get some idea of how big 1° is, go outside at night and find the Big Dipper. The two pointer stars at the ends of the bowl are 5.5° apart. The two stars across the top of the bowl are 10° apart. (Ten degrees is also about the width of your fist when held at arm’s length and projected against the sky.) Mizar, the second star from the end of the Big Dipper’s handle, appears double. The fainter star, Alcor, is about 12 arcmin from Mizar. For comparison, the diameter of the full moon is about 30 arcmin. The belt of Orion is about 3° long. Keeping all this in mind, why did it take until 1838 to make parallax measurements for even the nearest stars?arrow_forwardLook at The Sky Around You, item 1a. In the looking south illustration, is Canis Major a circumpolar constellation? Why or why not?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage Learning
Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage Learning
AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStax
Stars and GalaxiesPhysicsISBN:9781305120785Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage Learning
Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)
Physics
ISBN:9781337399920
Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana Backman
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)
Physics
ISBN:9781337399944
Author:Michael A. Seeds
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:9781938168284
Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. Wolff
Publisher:OpenStax
Stars and Galaxies
Physics
ISBN:9781305120785
Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana Backman
Publisher:Cengage Learning