Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305080577
Author: Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher: South-Western College Pub
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 35RSCQ
To determine
Introduction: The auditor is liable to provide accurate financial information to the third party. The liability depends on the jurisdiction of the case.
The way in which auditor’s liability towards third party differ as per Exchange Act 1933 and 1934 and the importance of H’s case.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
How does the auditor's libility to third parties differ under the 1933 Act and the 1934 Exchange Act? What is the importance of the Hochfelder case as it relates to the 1934 Act?
What are the major differences in auditors’ liability under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?
Which of the following would be the auditors’ most likely defense in an action broughtunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?a. The investor did not have privity with auditors.b. The investor did not suffer a loss based on the materially misstated financial statements.c. The auditors acted in good faith and were not aware of the materially misstated financialstatements.d. The financial statements were not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
Chapter 4 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit
Ch. 4 - Prob. 1TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 2TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 3TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 4TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 5TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 6TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 7TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 8TFQCh. 4 - Utilitarian theory holds that what is ethical is...Ch. 4 - Prob. 10TFQ
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 12TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 13MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 14MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 15MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 16MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 17MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 18MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 19MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 20MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 21MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 22MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 23MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 24MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 25RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 26RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 27RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 28RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 29RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 30RSCQCh. 4 - Refer to the Focus on Fraud feature “Moss Adams...Ch. 4 - Prob. 32RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 33RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 34RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 35RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 36RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 37RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 38RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 39RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 40RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 41RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 42RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 43RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 44RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 45RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 46RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 47RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 48RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 49RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 50RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 51RSCQCh. 4 - Refer to Exhibit 4.4. Briefly explain the seven...Ch. 4 - Prob. 53RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 54RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 55RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 56RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 57RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 58RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 59RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 60RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 61RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 62RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 63RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 64RSCQCh. 4 - KPMG (LO 1, 2, 3) KPMG LLP served as the external...Ch. 4 - Prob. 66FF
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence?arrow_forwardWhat defenses are available to auditors against suits brought by clients under common law? Against suits brought by third parties under common law?arrow_forwardAuditors may be held liable to both their clients and third parties under common law. a. What must a client prove to recover its losses from the auditors under common law? b. In a court that adheres to the precedent set by the Ultramares v. Touche case, what must an ordinary third party prove to recover losses from the auditors under common lawarrow_forward
- Which of the following is a major difference in auditors’ liability under the Securities Act of1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?a. The burden of proving reliance on misstated financial statements and the relationshipbetween these financial statements and the economic loss.b. The auditors’ required degree of professional care.c. Both of the above.d. Neither of the abovearrow_forwardIn comparison to the burden of proof required of plaintiffs in civil lawsuits against independent auditors under common law, section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934a. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to prove damages or losses.b. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to establish privity or a beneficiary relationshipwith auditors.c. Does not require that plaintiffs prove their reliance on materially misstated financialstatements.d. Does not require that plaintiffs prove that relying on the materially misstated financialstatements caused their losses.arrow_forwardHas the accounting profession created a situation in which auditors’ ethical behavior is impaired by their professional obligations? How does the profession’s view of such obligations relate to how courts tend to view the legal liability of auditors?arrow_forward
- What are the auditor’s responsibilities under the Corporations Act toreport breaches of the Act? Who does the auditor report to?arrow_forwardWhat does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence? Explain each item with an examplearrow_forwardThe burden of proof that must be proven to recover losses from the auditors under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is generally considered to be: :arrow_forward
- For what type of actions can clients bring suit against auditors under common law? What must clientsprove prior to bringing suit in each case?arrow_forwardWhat is the auditor's role in reporting violations of the Corporations Act under the Corporations Act? Who does the auditor have to answer to?arrow_forwardWhat is the auditors responsibility regarding the noncompliance with laws by a client?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningBusiness/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub