EP MYECONLAB DESIRE2LEARN >CUSTOM<
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781323612774
Author: *ST.LEO UNIV.
Publisher: PEARSON C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem aFCT
To determine
The way by which Therapick’s service reduced therapist’s transaction costs.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
discuss the dominant cost components of health care.
discuss some of the benefits and risks of new Health promoters basing their professional identities on established norms within this profession.
Which method(s) of payment to physicians will most likely result in higher total charges due to volume of services provided?
Capitation.
Salary.
Fee-for-service (FFS).
RBRVs.
Methods based on patient outcomes.
Chapter 4 Solutions
EP MYECONLAB DESIRE2LEARN >CUSTOM<
Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.1LOCh. 4 - Prob. 4.2LOCh. 4 - Prob. 4.3LOCh. 4 - Prob. 4.4LOCh. 4 - Prob. 4.5LOCh. 4 - Prob. aFCTCh. 4 - Prob. bFCTCh. 4 - Prob. cFCTCh. 4 - Prob. dFCTCh. 4 - Prob. eFCT
Ch. 4 - Prob. fFCTCh. 4 - Prob. 1CTQCh. 4 - Prob. 2CTQCh. 4 - Prob. 1FCTCh. 4 - Prob. 2FCTCh. 4 - Prob. 1PCh. 4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4 - Prob. 7PCh. 4 - Prob. 8PCh. 4 - Prob. 9PCh. 4 - Prob. 10PCh. 4 - Prob. 11PCh. 4 - Prob. 12PCh. 4 - Prob. 13PCh. 4 - Prob. 14P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Assume that people receiving intervention A live 5 years at quality of life of 0.8 and people receiving intervention B live 10 years at quality of life of 0.4. Assume further that the two intervention have equal costs. Compare the cost-effectiveness of these interventions relative to each other and discuss how that would be altered by inclusion of future costs for younger adults and older adults.arrow_forwardWhy would payers want to add shared savings components to PMPM or enhanced FFS payments to primary care clinicians?arrow_forwardInsurance coverage has been shown to diminish the importance of time in the decision about how much medical care to seek and which providers to use. True OR Falsearrow_forward
- How do economic evaluations in Healthcare inform policy and other decision makersarrow_forwardHospital has the following treatment options to reduce the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: For Treatment X (status quo), it would cost 50,000 with 40 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Y, it would cost 100,000 with 85 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Z, it would cost 75,000 with 65 percent effectiveness, and For Treatment V, it would cost 80,000 with 68 percent effectiveness. a) Is there any treatment option that is not economically rational? Explain. b) If hospital’s willing to pay is $1000, which treatment option it would choose? Explain. c) With technical innovation, suppose Treatment V increased its effectiveness to 75 percent, would your answer to question (a) above change?arrow_forwardThe size of the uninsured and underinsured population in the United States has become an indication of the access problems in the US healthcare system.TrueFalse Health economics can be defined as An examination of factors that impact healthcare An explanation of theories, models and tools that can be applied to understand costs, access, and quality One way to understand how best to compare and contrast alternatives Help healthcare leaders understand the costs and consequences of options All of the abovearrow_forward
- The information needed by health care organizations (such as commercial insurers) is often quite similar to that needed by public health entities. Please describe the types of information needed by both, as well as information that may be need by one but not the other.arrow_forwardThe biggest difference between the United States and Beveridge OR Bismarck counties’ health systems is: a. The US has longer life expectancy for higher income people b. The US permits/tolerates tens of millions of its citizens to be uninsured c. The US does more health technology assessment before utilization than other countries d. The US enjoys spending a higher percentage of its GDP on health care, it is a voluntary choice that reflects preferences for health care over other goods and servicesarrow_forwardHospital has the following treatment options to reduce the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: For Treatment X (status quo), it would cost 50,000 with 40 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Y, it would cost 100,000 with 85 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Z, it would cost 75,000 with 65 percent effectiveness, and For Treatment V, it would cost 80,000 with 68 percent effectiveness. Is there any treatment option that is not economically rational? Explain. If hospital’s willing to pay is $1000, which treatment option it would choose? Explain. With technical innovation, suppose Treatment V increased its effectiveness to 75 percent, would your answer to question (a) above change?arrow_forward
- How do fee-for-service and capitation payment systems affect the amount of medical care the patient receives relative to the optimum amount that would be provided by the “perfect” agent? Under which system we expect to see more supplier-induced demand?arrow_forwardHospital has the following treatment options to reduce the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: For Treatment X (status quo), it would cost 50,000 with 40 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Y, it would cost 100,000 with 85 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Z, it would cost 75,000 with 65 percent effectiveness, and For Treatment V, it would cost 80,000 with 68 percent effectiveness. Is there any treatment option that is not economically rational? Explain. If the hospital’swilling to pay is $1000, which treatment optionwould it choose? Explain With technical innovation, suppose Treatment V increased its effectiveness to 75 percent, would your answer to question (a) above change?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
