MICROECONOMICS W/CONNECT
18th Edition
ISBN: 9781307253085
Author: McConnell
Publisher: Mcgraw-Hill/Create
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4.A, Problem 1AP
Subpart (a):
To determine
Impact of asymmetric information on the price.
Sub Part b:
To determine
Impact of asymmetric information on the price.
Sub Part (c):
To determine
Impact of asymmetric information on the price.
Sub Part (d):
To determine
Impact of asymmetric information on the price.
Sub Part (e):
To determine
Impact of asymmetric information on the price.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
5
Suppose that a person’s demand curve for physician office visits is P = 200 – 20Q, where P is the price of an office visit, and Q is the number of physician visits per year. Also, suppose that the marginal cost of an office visit is always $60. c. Suppose this person obtains health insurance. The policy has no deductible, but has a coinsurance rate of 50 percent. How many visits will occur now? d. Suppose that the policy has no deductible but has a $20 co-payment. How many visits will occur now? e. Suppose the policy has a $20 co-payment and a $500 deductible. How many visits will occur now? f. Calculate the deadweight losses in the policies described in parts c, d, and e.
Suppose that there are 2 types of plans available to you.
Plan A has a deductible of $500, with 10 percent co-insurance rate for many health care services.
Plan B has a deductible fo $1000, with 35 percent co-insurance rate.
Plan A costs $200 per month in premiums while Plan B costs $80.
Discuss characteristics of people who would choose Plan A versus Plan B. Assuming that both plan types exist in the market, who would likely choose Plan B over Plan A? What plan would you choose?
Preventive care is not always cost-effective. Suppose that it costs $100 per person to administer a screening exam for a particular disease. Also suppose that if the screening exam finds the disease, the early detection given by the exam will avert $1,000 of costly future treatment. a. Imagine giving the screening test to 100 people. How much will it cost to give those 100 tests? Imagine a case in which 15 percent of those receiving the screening exam test positive. How much in future costly treatments will be averted? How much is saved by setting up a screening system? b. Imagine that everything is the same as in part a except that now only 5 percent of those receiving the screening exam test positive. In this case, how much in future costly treatments will be averted? How much is lost by setting up a screening system?
Chapter 4 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS W/CONNECT
Ch. 4.A - Prob. 1ADQCh. 4.A - Prob. 2ADQCh. 4.A - Prob. 3ADQCh. 4.A - Prob. 1ARQCh. 4.A - Prob. 2ARQCh. 4.A - Prob. 3ARQCh. 4.A - Prob. 1APCh. 4 - Prob. 1DQCh. 4 - Prob. 2DQCh. 4 - Prob. 3DQ
Ch. 4 - Prob. 4DQCh. 4 - Prob. 5DQCh. 4 - Prob. 6DQCh. 4 - Prob. 7DQCh. 4 - Prob. 8DQCh. 4 - Prob. 9DQCh. 4 - Prob. 1RQCh. 4 - Prob. 2RQCh. 4 - Prob. 3RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4RQCh. 4 - Prob. 5RQCh. 4 - Prob. 6RQCh. 4 - Prob. 7RQCh. 4 - Prob. 1PCh. 4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4 - Prob. 7P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose it is a well-known fact that among ten-year old Ford F-150s, half the trucks are good and half of them are lemons. Suppose that it is also known to all parties that a good truck is worth $8,000 to current owners and $10,000 to potential buyers. A bad truck, on the other hand, is only worth $1,000 to current owners and $2,000 to potential buyers. Throughout, assume that buyers are risk-neutral. 4) Suppose that after much haggling, the current owner is willing to let her truck go for $6,000. What is the most likely implication? a) The truck is a lemon. b) The buyer is an excellent negotiator. c) It's a mutually beneficial transaction.arrow_forwardPlease tell follwoing sentence is True or False? Explain in 5-6 sentence only Chay and Greenstone (2003a) use cross-county differences in changes in pollution induced by the 1981-82 recession to estimate the effect of air pollution on infant mortality. If counties with big pollution declines also experience dramatic drops in population (because households move to counties with better economic opportunities), relative to counties without pollution declines, this could generate bias in their estimates.arrow_forwardNow suppose agent C can produce private information about the true realization x at t=1 at the cost γ=4. Suppose lA=lB=φA=φB=1 and x is either 40 or 100 with equal probability and w=70. - At t=1, agent B owns the bond. What is the maximum amount LB that agent B can borrow with probability 1?- At t=0, what amount LA can agent A borrow from agent B in a repo trade at t=0 and what is the haircut in equilibrium?arrow_forward
- Say there are two individuals; Hala and Anna who are deciding on either to buy health insurance on a pooling arrangement basis or otherwise. Both face a 30% probability of losing RM40 on medical services and 70% of losing nothing. With these information discuss whether Hala and Anna should join this arrangement or pay the medical services costs out of their own pocket money.arrow_forwardSuppose a two-person household. Person 1 has h1 units of time available and takes l1 units of leisure time, and person 2 has h2 units of time available and takes l2 units of leisure time. Collectively, the two persons in the household care about their total consumption c, and their total leisure l=l1+l2, and they have preferences over their total consumption and total leisure just as specified in the course. But person 1 faces a market wage w1, and person 2 faces a market wage w2, with w1 > w2. 1) Draw the budget constraint faced by the two-person household. What will the household do, that is, how much does each household member work? 2) What happens if w2 rises? (w1 > w2 still holds) 3) Explain your results and interpretarrow_forwardSuppose the equilibrium price for good quality used cars is $20,000. And the equilibrium price for poor quality used cars is $10,000. Assume a potential used car buyer has imperfect information as to the condition of any given used car. Assume this potential buyer believes the probability a given used car is good quality is .60 and the probability a given used car is low quality is .40. Assume the seller has perfect information on all cars in inventory. How does the informational imbalance result in adverse selection? a. The expectedprice offered by the buyer encourages the seller to sell a poor quality car. Hence only poor quality cars are sold, which harms sellers. b. The expected price offered by the buyer encourages the seller to sell a good quality car. Hence only good quality cars are sold, which harms buyers. c. The expected price offered by the buyer encourages the seller to sell a good quality car. Hence only good quality cars are sold, which harms sellers. d. The…arrow_forward
- Look again at Figure 21.12. It appears that the investor in panel b can't lose and the investor in panel a can' t win. Is that correct? Note: The solution should not be hand written.arrow_forwardUse the following information for questions 12-14. Assume that there are two parties, I and V. I engages in an activity that tends to injure V. V and I both can take care to reduce the expected harm from accidents. Specifically, suppose that if I takes no care (i.e., spends $0 on accident precautions), expected injury to V is $25. If I spends $5 on accident precautions, however, the expected injury to V is reduced to $18. Further suppose that V has a choice between taking no care or spending $4 in care to avoid accidents. If V spends $4 in care, V’s expected harm falls by $2 regardless of the level of care that I takes. Assume that courts adopt the socially-optimal level of injurer care as the negligence standard. That is, if I takes less than the socially-optimal level of care, she will be found negligent and must pay for all damages to V. If I takes at least the socially optimal level of care, she will not have to compensate V for his damages. What is the Nash equilibrium of this…arrow_forwardUse the following information for questions 12-14. Assume that there are two parties, I and V. I engages in an activity that tends to injure V. V and I both can take care to reduce the expected harm from accidents. Specifically, suppose that if I takes no care (i.e., spends $0 on accident precautions), expected injury to V is $25. If I spends $5 on accident precautions, however, the expected injury to V is reduced to $18. Further suppose that V has a choice between taking no care or spending $4 in care to avoid accidents. If V spends $4 in care, V’s expected harm falls by $2 regardless of the level of care that I takes. Assume that courts adopt the socially-optimal level of injurer care as the negligence standard. That is, if I takes less than the socially-optimal level of care, she will be found negligent and must pay for all damages toV. If I takes at least the socially optimal level of care, she will not have to compensate V for his damages. Under a negligence standard, what is…arrow_forward
- Use the following information for questions 12-14. Assume that there are two parties, I and V. I engages in an activity that tends to injure V. V and I both can take care to reduce the expected harm from accidents. Specifically, suppose that if I takes no care (i.e., spends $0 on accident precautions), expected injury to V is $25. If I spends $5 on accident precautions, however, the expected injury to V is reduced to $18. Further suppose that V has a choice between taking no care or spending $4 in care to avoid accidents. If V spends $4 in care, V’s expected harm falls by $2 regardless of the level of care that I takes. Assume that courts adopt the socially-optimal level of injurer care as the negligence standard. That is, if I takes less than the socially-optimal level of care, she will be found negligent and must pay for all damages toV. If I takes at least the socially optimal level of care, she will not have to compensate V for his damages. Under a negligence standard, what are…arrow_forwardplease answer all multiple choice question, thanks. 1. Suppose an insurance company wishes to separate out drivers based on whether they are high-risk or low-risk drivers. It can do this by offering two different pricing schemes: one the appeals to low-risk drivers and another that appeals to high risk drivers. Which of the following pricing schemes would best appeal to a high-risk driver? NB: a deductable is the amount that the driver would have to pay in the event of a claim: a high premium but low deductable b. a high premium and high deductible c. None, high risk drivers prefer not to take out insurance. d. a low premium and high deductable 2. The incentive of imperfectly monitored workers to shirk can be reduced by: a. lower levels of monitoring and lower wages b. lower levels of monitoring and offering year-end bonuses c. higher levels of monitoring and offering year-end bonuses d. higher levels of monitoring and lower wages 3. Research has shown that investors in the stock…arrow_forwardGive typing answer with explanation and conclusion Suppose that a consumer’s demand curve for medical care is QD = −3P +17 with P = $5. Suppose that the beneficiary obtains an insurance plan through an insurer with a 25% coinsurance rate. Under the insurance arrangement, find the following: (a) Equilibrium price and quantity of medical care? (b) Magnitude of deadweight loss? (c) Cost to the beneficiary? (d) Cost to the insurer?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
