The amount that is to write by city. Introduction : The present value is regularly utilized in valuation to discount projections that organizations make about themselves so they can make sense of the amount that is required by the organization's price of stock or possibly its value of equity.

Question

It is now December 31, 2018 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2017 accident. She requested recovery of lost wages plus $300,000 for pain and suffering plus $60,000 for legal expenses. Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accident and that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 62, and the jury decided that she would have worked for another three years. She was scheduled to have earned $36,000 in 2017. (To simplify this problem, assume that the entire annual salary amount would have been received on December 31, 2017.) Her employer testified that she probably would have received raises of 3% per year. The actual payment for the jury award will be made on December 31, 2019. The judge stipulated that all dollar amounts are to be adjusted to a present value basis on December 31, 2019, using an 8% annual interest rate and using compound, not simple, interest. Furthermore, he…

Answer 1

Question

100%

Chapter 5, Problem 38P

Summary Introduction

To Determine: The amount that is to write by city.

Introduction: The present value is regularly utilized in valuation to discount projections that organizations make about themselves so they can make sense of the amount that is required by the organization's price of stock or possibly its value of equity.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

It is now December 31, 2018 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2017 accident. She requested recovery of lost wages plus $300,000 for pain and suffering plus $60,000 for legal expenses. Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accident and that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 62, and the jury decided that she would have worked for another three years. She was scheduled to have earned $36,000 in 2017. (To simplify this problem, assume that the entire annual salary amount would have been received on December 31, 2017.) Her employer testified that she probably would have received raises of 3% per year. The actual payment for the jury award will be made on December 31, 2019. The judge stipulated that all dollar amounts are to be adjusted to a present value basis on December 31, 2019, using an 8% annual interest rate and using compound, not simple, interest. Furthermore, he…

It is now December 31, 2017 (t = 0), and a jury justfound in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2016 accident.She requested recovery of lost wages plus $300,000 for pain and suffering plus $60,000for legal expenses. Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accidentand that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 62, and the jury decided thatshe would have worked for another 3 years. She was scheduled to have earned $36,000 in2016. (To simplify this problem, assume that the entire annual salary amount would havebeen received on December 31, 2016.) Her employer testified that she probably wouldhave received raises of 3% per year. The actual payment for the jury award will be madeon December 31, 2018. The judge stipulated that all dollar amounts are to be adjusted toa present value basis on December 31, 2018, using an 8% annual interest rate and usingcompound, not simple, interest. Furthermore, he stipulated that…

It is now December 31, 2008 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2007 accident. She requested recovery of lost wages plus $200,000 for pain and suffering plus $80,000 for legal expenses.Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accident and that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 55, and the jury decided that she would have worked for another 10 years. She was scheduled to have earned $84,000 in 2007. (To simplify this problem, assume that the entire annual salary amount would have been received on December 31, 2007.) Her employer testified that she probably would have received raises of 3% per year. The actual payment will be made on December 31, 2009. The judge stipulated that all dollar amounts are to be adjusted to a present value basis on December 31, 2009, using a 7% annual interest rate and using compound, not simple, interest. Furthermore, he stipulated that the pain…