HIS 112
null Edition
ISBN: 9781323880203
Author: Pearson
Publisher: PEARSON C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.2.4PA
To determine
Is it ever possible for an increase in pollution to make society better off.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
There are three industrial firms in Kitona. The Government wants to reduce pollution to 120 units, so it gives each firm 40 tradable pollution permits.
Firm
Initial Pollution Level
Cost reducing pollution by 1 unit
A
70 Units
$20
B
80 Units
$25
C
50 Units
$10
Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so. What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation?
Use a graph to illustrate the quantity of pollution that would be emitted (a) after a corrective tax has been imposed and (b) after tradable pollution permits have been imposed. Could these two quantities ever be equivalent?
There are three industrial firms in Kitona. The Government wants to reduce pollution to 120 units, so it gives each firm 40 tradable pollution permits.
Firm
Initial Pollution Level
Cost reducing pollution by 1 unit
A
70 Units
$20
B
80 Units
$25
C
50 Units
$10
Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so. What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation?
How much higher would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?
Chapter 5 Solutions
HIS 112
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - In a study at a large state university, students...
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- There are three identical firms in Happy Valley. Firms Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 unit A 30 units $20 B 40 units $30 C 20 units $10 The government wants to reduce total pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable permits. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so? What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? How much larger would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?arrow_forwardEconomists Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone found that in the two years following the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970, the sharp reduction in air pollution also led to a decline in infant deaths. Although this and other studies provide compelling evidence of the link between pollution and infant health, it is not clear that reductions from the much lower levels of ambient pollution today would have the same effect. Which of the following reasons could explain this? A. Today, the level of pollution is much higher. Therefore, it will take a much larger reduction in air pollution to reap benefits similar to those in 1970. B. When levels of pollution are high, the marginal benefit of reducing pollution also is high. It follows therefore that the benefit of reducing air pollution in 1970 would be much higher than the benefit from a proportional reduction in air pollution today when the level of pollution is much lower. C. When levels of pollution are…arrow_forwardSuppose households do not care much for better environmental quality. Use the demand & supply model for urban labor to illustrate what happens to total employment (L) when a tax is imposed on firms to internalize the negative externalities of pollution. Briefly discuss.arrow_forward
- Briefly explain what is meant by the term "externality" and how it occurs. What are some ways (name at least 2) in which a negative externality can be corrected?arrow_forwardThere are three industrial firms in Happy Valley.FirmInitial PollutionLevelCost of ReducingPollution by 1 UnitA 30 units $20B 40 units $30C 20 units $10The government wants to reduce pollution to 60 units,so it gives each firm 20 tradable pollution permits.a. Who sells permits and how many do they sell?Who buys permits and how many do they buy?Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are eachwilling to do so. What is the total cost of pollutionreduction in this situation?b. How much higher would the costs of pollutionreduction be if the permits could not be traded?arrow_forwardWhat are the costs of pollution according to the Lancet Commission on pollution and health? Why are those numbers likely to be an underestimate? Explain.arrow_forward
- Briefly explain why a positive externality creates deadweight loss. You can use a graph to support your answer.arrow_forwardIt’s common to think that reducing pollution is necessarily costly because to reduce pollution we need to tax firms who will then produce less. But can you think of one example in which pollution might not only be unpleasant but might actually reduce production?arrow_forwardSuppose MAC = 40 - 2E and MD = 2E. Draw a graph to show and calculate the following: a) What is the social net benefit of pollution abatement at e*? b) What is the social net benefit of pollution abatement with no pollution control? c) What is the social net benefit of pollution abatement with zero pollution? d) If the actual emission level is 15, what are the total social benefit, total social cost, and net social benefit of pollution abatement? Compared with the efficient level, what is the deadweight loss (in terms of missing net social benefit)?arrow_forward
- . In the context of both positive externalities and public goods, briefly explain why private firms or individuals might fail to make expenditures or investments that would produce broad social benefits.arrow_forwardIn an article in the agriculture magazine Choices, Oregon State University economist JunJie Wu made the following observation about the conversion of farmland to urban development: Land use provides many economic and social benefits, but often comes at a substantial cost to the environment. Although most economic costs are figured into land use decisions, most environmental externalities are not. These environmental "externalities" cause a divergence between private and social costs for some land uses, leading to an inefficient land allocation. For example, developers may not bear all the environmental and infrastructural costs generated by their projects. Such "market failures" provide a justification for private conservation efforts and public land use planning and regulation. What does the author mean by market failures and inefficient land use allocation? Explain why the author describes inefficient land allocation as a market failure. Illustrate your argument with a…arrow_forward7. (Market for Pollution Rights) The graph in page 302 shows the market for pollution rights. a. If there are no restrictions on pollution, what amount isdischarged? b. What is the quantity supplied and the quantitydemanded if the government restricts the amount ofdischarge to Q* but gives the permits away? c. Where is market equilibrium if the government sells thepermits at the market-clearing price? Illustrate this on the graph.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning