MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Economics
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134739403
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.3.12PA
To determine
How tax on toilet paper brings about an efficient level of production.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
3. The following is quoted from Global News "British Columbians could be fined $230 for not wearing a mask in indoor, public spaces" by Richard Zussman on November 24, 2020. "Provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry was reluctant to put in a mandatory mask policy but decided to support the policy after concerns were raised by businesses about enforcing a mask requirement." Many people would not wear masks in public indoor spaces before the mandatory mask policy was enforced. What kind of market failure do you think exist in this case? How does the $230 fine help address this market failure?
The figure shows the pizza market. A) If the price of a slice of 4-point pizza is $3, what is the consumer surplus of the 50th slice? B) If the price of a slice of pizza is $3, what is the producer surplus for the 50th slice of pizza? C) What is the efficient quantity? What is the equilibrium quantity? What is the loss when the equilibrium quantity is produced?
In an article in the agriculture magazine
Choices,
Oregon State University economist JunJie Wu made the following observation about the conversion of farmland to urban development:
Land use provides many economic and social benefits, but often comes at a substantial cost to the environment. Although most economic costs are figured into land use decisions, most environmental externalities are not. These environmental "externalities" cause a divergence between private and social costs for some land uses, leading to an inefficient land allocation. For example, developers may not bear all the environmental and infrastructural costs generated by their projects. Such "market failures" provide a justification for private conservation efforts and public land use planning and regulation.
What does the author mean by market failures and inefficient land use
allocation?
Explain why the author describes inefficient land allocation as a market failure. Illustrate your argument with a…
Chapter 5 Solutions
MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Economics
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - In a study at a large state university, students...
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1CTECh. 5 - Prob. 5.2CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A graph shows the hypothetical social demand (social), private demand, social supply, and private supply for energy. What is the total benefit at the privately efficient equilibrium? What is the total cost at the privately efficient equilibrium? What is the total benefit at the socially efficient equilibrium? How do you figure these out? What is the total surplus at the socially efficient equilibrium? The deadweight loss at privately efficient equilibrium compared to the socially efficient equilibrium? Thxarrow_forwardThe figure shows the market for new homes at the end of 2022. Virtually everyone requires a mortgage—a loan—to buy a home. In 2023, the interest rate paid on mortgages rose significantly. Consequently, at every price the quantity of new homes demand changed by 3 million. The market was in equilibrium in 2022 and 2023. You will be asked several questions about this situation. At the end of 2022, what was the allocatively efficient quantity of new homes? Illustrate how the market (that is, the demand and supply) for new homes changed in 2023. In 2023, what is the equilibrium price and quantity of new homes? What is the allocatively efficient quantity? What is the amount of consumer surplus? Is there a deadweight loss?arrow_forwardBriefly explain why environmental protection efforts and public park beautification are unlikely to happen in a free market unless the government provides them.arrow_forward
- The August 30, 2019 issue of the Wall Street Journal had a story "Ravenous China Could Spice Up U.S. Meat Stocks" about the devastating effects of the outbreak of African swine fever. You do not need to read the story, this paragraph from the article tells you all you need to know: "By July, the number of hogs in China - by far the world's largest pork consumer - was close to a third lower than a year earlier, according to official statistics. And the situation may be even worse than headline figures imply: A June report from Reuters suggested that as many as half of China's breeding pigs may have died or been slaughtered." Graphically depict the market for hogs in China, assuming that the demand curve slopes down and the supply curve slopes up. This is purely an analysis of the impact of African swine fever. It is true that trade wars between the U.S. and China are significant, but for this analysis, we are just looking for the impact of the deadly swine fever independent of any other…arrow_forwardThe following graph shows the market for milk. The market price of milk without government intervention is____________per gallon. Consider the legislation that doesn't allow the price of milk to be below $8 per gallon and stimulates that the government by any surplus milk produced at that price. In order to raise the price of $8 per gallon, the government would need to buy______million gallons of milk, which would cost the government__________million. Suppose there are only a few dairy Farmers who would benefit from this legislation and millions of consumers who would suffer through higher prices. In this case, legislation imposing price supports at $8 per gallon would mean which of the following? The legislation will probably pass because it's benefits are concentrated while it's cost or widespread. The legislation should pass because it's economical efficient, but it probably won't because consumers don't understand enough about economics. The legislation may or may not pass since…arrow_forwardThe following graph shows the daily market for jeans. Suppose the government institutes a tax of $40.60 per pair. This places a wedge between the price buyers pay and the price sellers receive.arrow_forward
- Suppose that the government imposes a per-unit tax on cell phones. The tax is imposed on producers of cell phones and the amount of the tax is $50 per cell phone. The following graph shows the effect of the tax. Use the graph to answer the following questions. a) What is the equilibrium P* and Q* before the imposition of the tax? b) How many cell phones per year are sold after the tax has been imposed? What price per cell phone do consumers pay after the tax has been imposed? c) What price do producers receive per cell phone after the tax is paid?arrow_forwardDue to the decrease in the level of water in the lakes of Chapel Hill, the local government wants to reduce the consumption of tap water. They are evaluating two alternatives: to impose a minimum price per gallon of tap water consumed that is five cents greater than the actual price, or to impose an excise tax of five cents on consumption of tap water. Assume that this market is originally in equilibrium. Which of these two alternatives will deliver a bigger reduction in the quantity consumed? Why? Use graphs to explain your answer. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardIn the past, some counties and countries have imposed taxes on sugar, saturated fats, and food made with those ingredients as a way to reduce consumption of those foods. Assume the government imposes a unit tax on all chocolate. Answer the following questions Is there an externality from consuming chocolate? Explain why or why not. Use a correctly labeled graph to show what happens in the market for chocolate as a result of the unit tax. On your graph, show the market equilibrium before and after the tax (i.e. show the equilibrium prices and quantities.) Show graphically what happens to consumer surplus and producer surplus after the tax (you may need a separate graph to show this.) Will consumers be able to shift this tax to sellers? If yes explain why/how. If no explain why not. Based on your answer to c, who will bear the incidence of this tax? Show this on a graph. How will consumers respond to the tax on chocolate? How will candy companies respond strategically to the tax on…arrow_forward
- The following graph shows the daily market for wine. Suppose the government institutes a tax of $11.60 per bottle. This places a wedge between the price buyers pay and the price sellers receive.arrow_forwardBriefly explain whether you agree with the following statement: "If consumer surplus LOADING... in a market increases, producer surplus LOADING... must decrease." A. The statement is incorrect. Consumer surplus (and producer surplus) could increase if the government intervenes in a market by imposing a price floor. B. The statement is incorrect. Consumer surplus (and producer surplus) could increase by decreasing deadweight loss. C. The statement is incorrect. Consumer surplus (and producer surplus) could increase by decreasing economic surplus. D. The statement is incorrect. Consumer surplus (and producer surplus) could increase by decreasing economic efficiency. E. The statement is correct.arrow_forwardPower stations emit sulfur dioxide as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of power production. Suppose the government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of sulfur dioxide). The following graph shows the daily demand for pollution rights.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you