Economics Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText (2-semester Access) -- Access Card Package (6th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134417295
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.4.11PA
To determine
Applying concept of free riding.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that Jacques, an economist from a university in Arizona, and Kyoko, an economist from a school of industrial relations, are arguing over
government intervention. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate:
Kyoko: The usefulness of government intervention in the economy is a long-standing issue that economists continue to debate.
Jacques: I feel that government involvement in the economy should be reduced because government programs cause more harm than
good.
Kyoko: While I do agree that government programs can be inefficient, I really think they are necessary to help the less fortunate.
The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to
Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economis
differences in values
differences between perception versus reality
O Central banks should focus more on maintaining low une
differences in scientific judgments
O Business managers can raise profit more easily by reduc
O Employers should not be…
Suppose that Gilberto, an economist from a business school in Georgia, and Juanita, an economist from a university in Massachusetts, are arguing over government intervention. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate:
JUANITA: The usefulness of government intervention in the economy is a long-standing issue that economists continue to debate.
GILBERTO: I feel that government involvement in the economy should be reduced because government programs cause more harm than good.
JUANITA: While I agree that government programs can be inefficient, I really think they are necessary to help the less fortunate.
The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to _____________ (options: differences in values, imperfect information).
Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree?
A. Rent controls will only add value to housing in a city.
B. Free trade is usually preferable to the erection of tariffs and…
BN10.3
Case:
Your non-profit has just been awarded a special government environmental clean-
up grant of $90,000. You are given the choice to take the $90,000 now or wait
until next year. With an election coming up, the amount of next year's grant will
vary based on which party wins. Assuming that money tomorrow is worth the
same as money today, the grant amounts are:
Outcome
Democrats control everything
Republicans control everything
Split government
Assume:
Grant Amount
$160,000
$36,100
$90,000
Probability
0.25
0.25
0.50
Assume your Payoff in each case (based on your utility function) is sqrt (grant
amount).
Question:
Do you accept the Money today or wait until next year? Include Calculations of
the Expected Value and Expected Utility.
Chapter 5 Solutions
Economics Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText (2-semester Access) -- Access Card Package (6th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - In a study at a large state university, students...
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Consider two ways of protecting elephants from poachers in African countries. In one approach, the government sets up enormous national parks that have sufficient habitat for elephants to thrive and forbids all local people to enter the parks or to injure either the elephants or their habitat in any way. In a second approach, the government sets up national parks and designates 10 villages around the edges of the park as official tourist centers that become places where tourists can stay and bases for guided tours inside the national park. Consider the different incentives of local villagers—who often are very poor—in each of these plans. Which plan seems more likely to help the elephant population?arrow_forwardAn economist gives the following advice to a museum director: "You should introduce "peak pricing". At times when the museum has few visitors, you should admit visitors for free. And at times when the museum has many visitors, you should charge a higher admission fee." a) When the museum is quiet, is it rival or non-rival in consumption? Is it excludable or non-excludable? What %23 type of good-public or private - is the museum at those times? What would be the efficient price to charge visitors, and why? (I.e., should the price = $0, or should it be >$0?) %3D b) When the museum is busy, is it rival or non-rival in consumption? Is it excludable or non-excludable? What type of good is the museum at those times? What would be the efficient price to charge visitors, and why?arrow_forwardThe pandemic has upended the way New Yorkers dine out: There are sidewalk tables, open streets, streeteries, and barely anyone eating indoors. Now, as the weather gets colder, there are also plastic bubbles out on sidewalks, too. A video of the dome-shaped tents on a West Village street went viral this week, prompting questions of how safe they are, not to mention just what they are. Bubbles of various sorts have shown up around the country since restaurants began to ease into this new, strange era of dining out. […] But the igloolike tents can also get costly and require strict sanitation measures, and some health experts question how safe they actually are. … the big question: Are these things safe? Along with sanitation protocols, most restaurants use flameless candles inside the bubbles in hopes of avoiding any melt-y fires (PVC is toxic when it burns). But the biggest concern is of course the reason for the bubble in the first place, COVID. Dr. Abraar Karan is an internal…arrow_forward
- What are two characteristics of a Political Economy that are conducive to entrepreneurs (i.e., they create an environment that encourages the formation of new businesses)?arrow_forwardBecky and Sarah are sisters who share a room. Their room can easily get messy, and their parents are always telling them to tidy it. Here are the costs and benefits to both Becky and Sarah, of taking the time to clean their room: If both Becky and Sarah clean, they each spends two hours and get a clean room. If Becky decides not to clean and Sarah does all the cleaning, then Sarah spends 10 hours cleaning (Becky spends 0) but Sarah is exhausted. The same would occur for Becky if Sarah decided not to clean—Becky spends 10 hours and becomes exhausted. If both girls decide not to clean, they both have a dirty room. a. What is the best outcome for Becky and Sarah? What is the worst outcome? (It would help you to construct a prisoner’s dilemma table.) b. Unfortunately, we know that the optimal outcome will most likely not happen, and that the sisters probably will choose the worst one instead. Explain what it is about Becky’s and Sarah’s reasoning that will lead them both to choose the…arrow_forwardSuppose that two individuals, Jon and David, form a community and would like to construct a communal fort that would protect them from attacks. They both consume good X, a private good, and the protection of the fort, P. One unit of good X costs 1 unit of currency, and one unit of P costs 2 units of currency. Both Jon and David have an income of 100 and a utility function of the form: U = log(Xi) + 2 × log(PJ + PD)The budget constraint for each is given by:Xi + 2 × Pi = 100 (a) Find the amount of protection Jon will provide as a function of how much David provides, and explain why the relationship is the way it is.arrow_forward
- Imagine that a town of 200 people is trying to decide whether to pay for mosquito control. The town has surveyed their citizens and they each say they value mosquito control at $75. Mosquito control only costs $2,500 so the town goes ahead and pays for the service. When the town asks for donations to pay for the mosquito control, they only receive $1,000. What does this result show? Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. a The town's citizens were free riders. b The mosquito control suffered from the tragedy of commons. The mosquito control cost must have been greater than its economic benefit. d. The town's survey must have overestimated the value of mosquito control.arrow_forwardDmitri and Jake are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the water fountain or to keep that $300 for a pool table. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Dmitri and Jake will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.70 of benefit. For example, if both Dmitri and Jake choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the water fountain. So, Dmitri and Jake would each receive $420 of benefit from the water fountain, and their combined benefit would be $840. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a pool table is a private good, if Dmitri chooses to spend $300 on a pool table, Dmitri would get $300 of benefit from the pool table and Jake wouldn't receive any benefit from Dmitri's choice. If Dmitri still spends $300 on a pool table and Jake chooses to contribute…arrow_forwardConsider the town of Springfield with only three residents, Sophia, Amber, and Cedric. The three residents are trying to determine how large, in acres, they should build the public park. The table below shows each resident's willingness to pay for each acre of the park. The cost to build the park is $21 per acre. The government wants to tax each person $7 to build each acre ($21/3). How many acres will be built if majority rules. Sophia $10 Acres Amber Cedric $24 18 $6 2 3. 14 4. 3. 8. 1 6. 2 Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer 3 acres, total surplus $50 b. 2 acres, total surplus $29 2 acres total surplus $125 1 acres total surplus 59arrow_forward
- Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must be reduced to zero in order to alleviate global warming in the United States. Which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with this policy? Reducing methane emissions is desirable, but whatever levels of pollution firms decide to emit privately are already efficient. Society would not benefit from lower air pollution. The environment isn’t worth protecting. The opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit.arrow_forwardOn 24 February 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave orders for Russian troops to invade Ukraine. This invasion of Ukraine followed statements by the Russian government that Ukrainian soldiers had destroyed a Russian Security border facility and attempted to enter Russian territory illegally; accusations which Ukrainian officials strongly denied. The invasion of Ukraine has gathered worldwide attention, and has been strongly denounced by citizens, governments and international organisations. In an attempt to try and resolve the conflict, President Putin of Russia and President Zelenskyy of Ukraine have agreed to engage with one another surrounding ways of coming to a peaceful agreement between the two sides. Another round of peace negotiations were scheduled to take place on 16 March 2022. Imagine that in these negotiations, President Zeleskyy and President Putin have two strategies available to them: either they can be firm about their position and stand their ground regarding…arrow_forwardWhen countries specialize in producing certain goods and then freely exchange those goods for other goods with different countries, what is the advantage? Group of answer choices Each country can consume at a point outside their production possibilities frontier. All people in each country will be better off than they would be if they did not trade. Each country can produce at a point outside their production possibilities frontier. Each country can produce and consume at a point outside their production possibilities frontier.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning